REID (Research and Evaluation in Education)
Keywords
development, creative thinking skills, diagnostic assessments, Biology pre-service teacher
Document Type
Article
Abstract
The research aims to develop a diagnostic test assessment to measure the creative thinking skills of biology preservice teacher students. This research and development used Thiagarajan's 4D (Define, Design, Develop, and Dissemination) model. The diagnostic test assessment was developed in the form of an essay test with five numbers of scoring rubrics. This research was conducted at the Biology Education Study Program, University of Sintuwu Maroso. The results of the expert validation of the assessment instrument are high, and the reliability value is high. The results of the test found that all questions were valid and reliable. The student's creative thinking skills obtained an average value of fluency of 75.01% in the high category, flexibility thinking skills of 64.13% in the medium category, originality thinking skills of 69.56% in the medium category, elaboration skills of 75.01% in the high category and evaluation skills of 75.07% in the high category. All students' creative thinking skills are in the moderate category with a score of 71.74%, and the follow-up to the diagnostic results is that the lecturer can provide remedial on several learning indicators that have not been achieved.
Page Range
152-168
Issue
2
Volume
8
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/reid.v8i2.50885
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/50885
Recommended Citation
Eliaumra, E., Samaela, D., & Muhdin, N. K. (2022). Developing diagnostic test assessment to measure creative thinking skills of Biology preservice teacher students. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 8(2), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v8i2.50885
References
Abraham, A. (2015). Gender and creativity: An overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10(2), 609-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9410-8
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Akhan, N. E., Cicek, S., & Kocaaga, G. (2022). Critical and creative perspectives of gifted students on global problems: Global climate change. Thinking Skill and Creativity, 4(101131). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101131
Álvarez-Huerta, P., Muela, A., & Larrea, I. (2022). Disposition toward critical thinking and creative confidence beliefs in higher education students: The mediating role of openness to diversity and challenge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101003
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (2nd ed.) (R. Damayanti, Ed.). Bumi Aksara.
Armandita, P., Wijayanto, E., Rofiatus, L., Susanti, A., & Rumiana, S. (2017). Analisis kemampuan berfikir kreatif pembelajaran Fisika di kelas XI MIA 3 SMA Negeri 11 Kota Jambi. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.21831/JPIPFIP.V10I2.17906
Chin, H., Meng, C. C., Lian, H., & Mee, T. L. (2021). Development and validation of a cognitive diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items for addition of time. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(4), 817-837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10170-5
Darmadi, H. (2011). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Alfabeta.
de Vries, J. A., Dimosthenous, A., K. Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. J. (2022). The impact on student achievement of an assessment for learning teacher professional development program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74, 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101184
Dhavala, S., Bhatia, C., Bose, J., Faldu, K., & Avasthi, A. (2020). Auto generation of diagnostic assessments and their quality evaluation. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2020, 730-735.
Ernawati, M. D. W., Muhammad, D., Asrial, A., & Muhaimin, M. (2019). Identifying creative thinking skills in subject matter Bio-Chemistry. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 581-589. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20257
Gronlund, N. E. (1996). Contructiing achievement test. Prentice-Hall.
Gulliksen, M. S. (2018). Norwegian parents' perspective on environmental factors that influence creativity - An empirical grounding for future studies. International Journal of Educational Research, 88, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.013
Habibi, H., Mundilarto, M., Jumadi, J., Gummah, S., Ahzan, S., & Prasetya, D. S. B. (2020). Project brief effects on creative thinking skills among low-ability pre-service Physics teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2), 415-420. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20531
Haerunisa, H., Prasetyaningsih, P., & Leksono, S. M. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berfikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal HOTS tema air dan pelestarian lingkungan. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 299-308. https://ummaspul.e-journal.id/maspuljr/article/view/1199
Halek, M., Holle, D., & Bartholomeyczik, S. (2017). Development and evaluation of the content validity, practicability and feasibility of the innovative dementia-oriented assessment system for challenging behaviour in residents with dementia. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 554. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2469-8
Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 153-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2
Henriksen, D., Henderson, M., Creely, E., Carvalho, A. A., Cernochova, M., Dash, D., Davis, T., & Mishra, P. (2021). Creativity and risk-taking in teaching and learning settings: Insights from six international narratives. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100024
Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., & Yovanoff, P. (2009). Diagnostic assessments in mathematics to support instructional decision making. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 14(16). https://doi.org/10.7275/vxrk-3190
Lawhon, D. (1976). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook - Reviews of school psychological materials. Journal of School Psychology, 14(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(76)90066-2
Li, Y., Kim, M., & Palkar, J. (2022). Using emerging technologies to promote creativity in education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100177
Lia, R. M., Rusilowati, A., & Isnaeni, W. (2020). NGSS-oriented chemistry test instruments: Validity and reliability analysis with the Rasch model. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 6(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v6i1.30112
Morney, E. (2022). Creative prerequisites for innovation in group collaboration“”A case study of slow-TV, the genesis of a Norwegian television genre. Journal of Creativity, 32(3), 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2022.100031
Munandar, U. (2014). Pengembangan kreativitas anak berbakat. Rineka Cipta.
Polgar, S., & Thomas, S. (2013). Introduction to Research in Thh Health Sciences. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier.
Prasetiyo, A. D., & Mubarokah, L. (2014). Berpikir kreatif siswa dalam penerapan model pembelajaran berdasar masalah matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo, 2(1), 9-18. http://lppm.stkippgri-sidoarjo.ac.id/files/Berpikir-Kreatif-Siswa-Dalam-Penerapan-Model-Pembelajaran-Berdasar--Masalah-Matematika.pdf
Purwasih, R. (2019). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari adversity quotient tipe climber. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i2.2118
Ravand, H., & Robitzsch, A. (2015). Cognitive diagnostic modeling using R. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 20(11), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.7275/5g6f-ak15
Roth, T., Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2022). The relevance of school self-concept and creativity for CLIL outreach learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101153
Saregar, A., Cahyanti, U. N., Misbah, M., Susilowati, N. E., Anugrah, A., & Muhammad, N. (2021). Core learning model: Its effectiveness towards students' creative thinking. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20813
Schellekens, L. H., Bok, H. G. J., de Jong, L. H., van der Schaaf, M. F., Kremer, W. D. J., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2021). A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094
Siburian, J., Corebima, A. D., Ibrohim, I., & Saptasari, M. (2019). The correlation between critical and creative thinking skills on cognitive learning results. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (81), 99-114. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejer/issue/45577/572934
Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Successful intelligence: A model for testing intelligence beyond IQ tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8(2), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.09.004
Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan keuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
Sur, E., and AteÅŸ, M. (2022). Examination of the relationship between creative thinking skills and comprehension skills of middle school students. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.42.9.2
Susanto, A. (2013). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Syafrial, S., Ashadi, A., Saputro, S., & Sarwanto, S. (2022). Trend creative thinking perception of students in learning natural science: gender and domicile perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15140a
Tang, F., & Zhan, P. (2021). Does diagnostic feedback promote learning? Evidence from a longitudinal cognitive diagnostic assessment. AERA Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211060804
Thompson, N. A. (2013). Reliabity and validity. Assessment Systems.
Trianggono, M. M., & Yuanita, S. (2018). Karakteristik keterampilan berpikir kreatif dalam pemecahan masalah Fisika berdasarkan gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 4(2), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v4i2.2980
Yusnaeni, Y., Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative thinking of low academic student undergoing search solve create and share learning integrated with metacognitive strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10216a
Zhang, Z. (2018). Designing cognitively diagnostic assessment for algebraic content knowledge and thinking skills. International Education Studies, 11(2), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n2p106
Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., & Mistianah, M. (2015). Asesmen berpikir kritis terintegrasi tes essay [Critical thinking assessment integrated with essay tests]. A paper presented at Simposium on Biology Education, Jurusan Biologi FKIP Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta, 200-213.