•  
  •  
 

Keywords

creative thinking ability, cognitive knowledge, Big Five personality, creative thinking level, novel answer

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This research aims at describing the ability and level of student's creative thinking and student's cognitive knowledge. It is qualitative research to search for data and information. Operationally, this research was conducted with some steps namely: (1) giving a set of big five personality test to 215 students to determine their personality type, (2) giving a set of creative thinking test of 215 students to measure the ability and level of their creative thinking, and (3) choosing one student randomly from each student's personality type to be interviewed to search their cognitive knowledge. The results show that every student has a creative thinking ability, but the level of creative thinking varies. The category of student's creative thinking ability based on Big Five Personalities is 'moderate or high'. The level of student's creative thinking based on the big five personality is 'very creative, creative, quite creative or less creative'. The student's cognitive knowledge based on the big five personality is drawing, designing, ascertaining, dividing, reasoning, analogy, imagining, utilizing, solving, understanding, determining, mentioning, and using trial and error.

Page Range

85-94

Issue

2

Volume

5

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/reid.v5i2.22848

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/22848

References

Alenikov, A. (Ed.). (2002). The future of creativity. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Press.

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., “¦ Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.

Bahr, D. L., & Bossé, M. J. (2008). The state of balance between procedural knowledge and conceptual understanding in mathematics teacher education. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1-28. Retrieved from http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/2880

Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered lterature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355-429. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430

Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 532-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.008

Briggs, M., & Davis, S. (2008). Creative teaching: Mathematics in the early years and primary classroom. London: Routledge.

Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4

Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2-3), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2004.9651452

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

de Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. In The National Council on Education and the Disciplines (Ed.), Quantitative literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges (pp. 75-89). Retrieved from https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/QL/WhyNumeracyMatters.pdf

Ee, D. N. K., & Widjaja, W. (2013). Mathematical modelling in the primary school: Elements in teacher education. 5th Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference. Singapore: National Institute of Education.

Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2006). Theories of personality. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Education.

Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (Eds.). (2008). The personality reader (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.197

Grieshober, W. E. (2004). Continuing a dictionary of creative term and definitions. Buffalo, NY.

Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for change (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

Ivcevic, Z., & Mayer, J. D. (2006). Creative types and personality. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 26(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.2190/0615-6262-G582-853U

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Martin, P. N. (2009). Societal transformation and reference services in the academic library: Theoretical foundations for re-envisioning reference. Library Philosophy and Practice, (May), 1-8. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1265&context=libphilprac

Mayer, J. D. (2003). Structural divisions of personality and the classification of traits. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 381-401. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.381

Mayer, J. D. (2005). A tale of two visions: Can a new view of personality help integrate psychology? American Psychologist, 60(4), 294-307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.4.294

McGregor, S. L. T. (2007). International Journal of Consumer Studies: Decade review (1997-2006). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00566.x

Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403

Munandar, U. (1999). Kreativitas dan keterbakatan, strategi mewujudkan potensi kreatif dan bakat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Neethling, K. (2000). The beyonders. In E. P. Torrance (Ed.), On the edge and keeping on the edge (pp. 153-166). Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Press.

Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (2004). Methodological considerations on investigating teachers' beliefs of mathematics and its teaching. NOMAD - Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 21-49.

Rahayu, S. (2015). Pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan PMRI memang beda. Buletin, VI(February). Retrieved from http://www.pmri.or.id/main.php

Santrock, J. W. (2003). Psychology (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Santrock, J. W. (2007). Child development (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Setiawan, R. (2016). Construct of creative thinking assessment on divergent and convergent ability. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 2(4), 1034-1041. Retrieved from http://ijariie.com/FormDetails.aspx?MenuScriptId=1904

Setiawan, R. (2017). The influence of income, experience, and academic qualification on the early childhood education teachers' creativity in Semarang, Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1043a

Silvia, P. J. (2008). Another look at creativity and intelligence: Exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 1012-1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.027

Siswono, T. T. (2004). Pendekatan pembelajaran matematika. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Smith, M. K. (2008). Howard Gardner, multiple intelligences and education. Retrieved from The Encyclopedia of Pedagogy and Informal Education (Infed.org) website: https://infed.org/mobi/howard-gardner-multiple-intelligences-and-education/

Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652925

Stillman, G. A. (2015). Applications and modelling research in secondary classrooms: What have we learnt? In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 791-805). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6

Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2008). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15(4), 297-31

Download

Share

COinS