•  
  •  
 

Keywords

biodiversity topic; digital literacy; project-based learning; socioscientific issues

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Educational institutions can utilize digital technology to engage students in various learning models. The presence of technology must be combined with 21st-century skills, including digital literacy. This research aims to determine the increase in digital literacy (communication and collaboration, critical thinking, ICT familiarity, data literacy, device security, dan personal security) of high school students in the application of project-based learning (PjBL) integrated with socio-scientific issues in biodiversity material. The method used in this research is the pre-experimental method with a one-group pre-test-post-test design. The population and sample are class X students from one of the high schools in Bandung City, consisting of 36 students. The instruments used consist of a questionnaire, observation sheets, and product assessment rubrics. The data obtained were analyzed using the paired sample t-test and the N-Gain analysis test with the help of the SPSS Ver program 25. The research results show an increase in students' digital literacy from the high category to the very high category with an N-Gain gain of 0.59 and being in the medium category. There has been an increase in digital literacy in each category, the highest increase was obtained by the ICT familiarity indicator (N-Gain=0.78) and the lowest was obtained by the personal security indicator (N-Gain=0.31). The digital literacy aspect of the digital handbook product created by students received an average score of 86.75% and was in the very high category.

First Page

196

Last Page

209

Page Range

196-209

Issue

2

Volume

10

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jipi.v10i2.76925

References

Alorda, B., Suenaga, K., & Pons, P. (2011). Design and evaluation of a microprocessor course combining three cooperative methods: SDLA, PjBL and CnBL. Computers and Education, 57(3), 1876–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.004

Anggraeni, R. (2019). IMPROVEMENT OF DIGITAL LITERATION IN ASPECTS OF CREATIVITY THINKING PARTICIPANTS EDUCATION THROUGH PROJECT BASED LEARNING (PBL) IN SOCIAL STUDIES (A Class Action Research Study in SMPN 30 Bandung). International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies, 4(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijposs.v4i1.15387

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y

Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Sherwood, R. D., & Schlegel, W. M. (2013). Students’ Participation in an Interdisciplinary, Socioscientific Issues Based Undergraduate Human Biology Major and Their Understanding of Scientific Inquiry. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1051–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9298-x

Eastwood, J. L., Schlegel, W. M., & Cook, K. L. (2011). Effects of an Interdisciplinary Program on Students’ Reasoning with Socioscientific Issues and Perceptions of Their Learning Experiences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_6

Elfarissyah, A., & , Ifan Iskandar, R. D. (2022). THE EFFICIENCY OF PROJECT BASED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ DIGITAL LITERACY. 9009, 142–152.

Eliana, E. D. S., Senam, Wilujeng, I., & Jumadi. (2016). The effectiveness of project-based e-learning to improve ICT literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5789

Faridah, N. R., Afifah, E. N., & Lailiyah, S. (2022). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi dan Literasi Digital Peserta Didik Madrasah Ibtidaiyah [The Effectiveness of Project Based Learning Learning Models on Numerical Literacy and Digital Literacy Skill. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1), 709–716.

G20 Toolkit, I. (2022). G20 Toolkit for Measuring Digital Skills and Digital Literacy A Compilation of Reports Priority Issue 2-Digital Skills and Digital Literacy ii G20 Toolkit for Measuring Digital Skills and Digital Literacy Overview. 2.

Gurung, B., & Rutledge, D. (2014). Digital learners and the overlapping of their personal and educational digital engagement. Computers and Education, 77, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.012

Kemendikbud. (2014). Materi Pelatihan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Tahun 2014. Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan, 197.

Kemenkominfo. (2022). Status Literasi Digital di Indonesia 2022. Kominfo, November, 205–207. https://www.c2es.org/content/renewable-energy/

Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Ip, T. (2016). Use of computer technology for English language learning: do learning styles, gender, and age matter? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 1033–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1140655

Mariyani, M., & Triyani, T. (2023). Profil Literasi Digital Mahasiswa Di Era Digitalisasi. Bhineka Tunggal Ika: Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Pendidikan PKn, 10(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.36706/jbti.v10i1.20421

Niswara, R., Muhajir, M., & Untari, M. F. A. (2019). Pengaruh model project based learning terhadap high order thinking skill. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 7(2), 85–90.

Revilia, D., & Irwansyah. (2020). Literasi Media Sosial: Kesadaran Keamanan Dan Privasi Dalam Perspektif Generasi Milenial. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik, 24(1), 1–15.

Sahidillah, M. W., & Miftahurrisqi, P. (2019). Whatsapp sebagai Media Literasi Digital Siswa. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 31(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v1i1.8904

Sefriani, R., Sepriana, R., Wijaya, I., Radyuli, P., & Menrisal. (2021). Blended learning with edmodo: The effectiveness of statistical learning during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I1.20826

Setyaningsih, R., Abdullah, A., Prihantoro, E., & Hustinawaty, H. (2019). Model Penguatan Literasi Digital Melalui Pemanfaatan E-Learning. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(6), 1200. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v3i6.333

Sinaga, S. J., Najamuddin, N., Dewi, D. A., Widodo, U., Siahaan, K. W. A., Misbah, M., Achmad, G. H., & Mobo, F. D. (2023). Implementation of PBL Model on Strengthening Students’ Numerical Literacy and Digital Literacy Skills. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(1), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i1.3123

Sismawarni, W. U. D., Usman, U., Hamid, N., & Kusumaningtyas, P. (2020). Pengaruh Penggunaan Isu Sosiosaintifik dalam Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 2(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v2i1.4265

Soparat, S., Arnold, S. R., & Klaysom, S. (2015). The development of thai learners’ key competencies by project-based learning using ICT. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.01778

Sugiyono, D. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. In Penerbit Alfabeta.

Surur, M., Nurtjahyani, S. D., & Yana, I. (2023). The Effect of Project Based Learning on Digital Literacy Skills and Conceptual Understanding in an Online-Based Flipped Classroom Environment Receive : 10 / 01 / 2023. 7(1), 849–856.

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1202–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.006

Willingham, D. T. (2010). Ej889143. American Educator, 34(1), 17–20.

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281

Share

COinS