•  
  •  
 

REID (Research and Evaluation in Education)

Keywords

education and training, evaluation program, Kirkpatrick model, Solo technopark

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of a training program for youth in Solo Technopark, Central Java, Indonesia, and get important feedback and recommendations to increase its effectiveness. The evaluation method used is based on four levels of the Kirkpatrick model to assess: (1) participants' reaction to the training program (to the contents, facilitators, and facilities); (2) training participants' learning (knowledge and basic skills); (3) change of participant behaviors; and (4) succeed of the training participants based on competence skills and rate of graduate employability and employer's satisfaction. Research respondents were 47 training participants from four optional courses at the reaction and learning level. There were 59 alumni, three training instructors, and one employer as the respondents at the behavior and results level. Data were collected using questionnaires, interviews, documentation, and an observation checklist. The data were analyzed using the quantitative descriptive analysis method. The study shows that: (1) at the reaction level, most training participants are satisfied with the training program, instructors, and facilities; (2) at the learning level, most participants have a good category in knowledge and basic skills; (3) at the behavior level, participants can implement the attitudes and major skills at a good level; (4) at the results level, alumni have high skills at workplaces; they have been employed in various industries, and the alumni's employability rate is less than 50%. To increase the low rate of employability in the labor market, Solo Technopark needs to improve alumni networking and collaboration with industries and employers.

Page Range

150-159

Issue

2

Volume

6

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/reid.v6i2.36794

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/36794

References

Central Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Prediksi penduduk Indonesia 2010-2035. Central Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved December 3, 2020, from https://www.bappenas.go.id/files/5413/9148/4109/Proyeksi_Penduduk_Indonesia_2010-2035.pdf

Central Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Keadaan pekerja di Indonesia Agustus 2020. Central Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved December 4, 2020, from https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2020/11/30/351ae49ac1ea9d5f2e42c0da/keadaan-pekerja-di-indonesia-agustus-2020.html

Chang, I. -Y. & Chang, W. -Y. (2012). The effect of student learning motivation on learning satisfaction. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 4(3), 281-305.

Gough, S. (2018). Technical and vocational education and training. MPG Books Group.

Grohmann, A., & Kauffeld, S. (2013). Evaluating training programs: Development and correlates of the questionnaire for professional training evaluation. International Journal of Training and Development, 17(2), 135-155.

Kirkpatrick. (2006). Evaluating training program. Berrett-Koehler.

Ministry of Industry of the Republic of Indonesia. (2019). Berbasis padat karya dan orientasi ekspor, pemerintah pacu industri furnitur. Retrieved December 5, 2020, from https://kemenperin.go.id/artikel/20405/

Muhammad, N. A., Muhyiddin, M., Faisal, A., & Anindito, I. A. (2017). Studi pembangunan Science and Technopark (STP) di Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Dan Pembangunan, 1(1), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v1i1.6

Mukhlish, B. M. (2018). Kolaborasi antara universitas, industri dan pemerintah dalam meningkatkan inovasi dan kesejahteraan masyarakat: Konsep, implementasi dan tantangan. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Terapan, 1(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.7454/jabt.v1i1.27

Pitaloka, A. A., & Humaedi, M. A. (2020). Science and Technology Park (STP): Transformation to Quadruple Helix approach for habituation of science and technology in Indonesia Science Technology Park (STP). Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 19(1), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.5614%2Fsostek.itbj.2020.19.1.14

Praslova, L. (2010). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22(3), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9098-7

Putra, E. P. (2019). Menjawab persoalan kebutuhan tenaga kerja terampil. Republika. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://republika.co.id

Rahayu, A. T., & Nurharjadmo, W. (2017). Evaluasi implementasi program pengembangan Solo Technopark. Jurnal Waca Publik, 1(6), 48-57.

Ramadhani, A. D. P. (2015). Evaluasi proses pelaksanaan program inkubator bisnis dan teknologi Solo Technopark di Kota Surakarta. Thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.

Smidt, A., Balandin, S., Sigafoos, J., & Reed, V. A. (2009). The Kirkpatrick model: A useful tool for evaluating training outcomes. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34(3), 266-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250903093125

Suprayitna, I. (2020). 6,88 Juta pengangguran di Indonesia paling banyak lulusan SMK. Suara.Com. Retrieved on May 5, 2020, from https://suara.com/bisnis/

Winardi, W., Priyarsono, D., Siregar, H., & Kustanto, H. (2019). Peranan kawasan industri dalam mengatasi gejala deindustrialisasi. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 19(1), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.v19i1.834

Share

COinS