•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA

Keywords

listrik dinamis, kerja investigasi, keterampilan proses, literasi sains siswa

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Materi listrik (utamanya listrik dinamis) di SMP merupakan materi yang tergolong sulit. Kurangnya inovasi guru dalam membelajarkan materi ini merupakan salahsatu faktor penyebabnya. Demikian pula, kurangnya guru melatihkan kerja ilmiah sebagai ciri dari pembelajaran sains menyebabkan pemahaman siswa terhadap sains menjadi kurang bermakna. Dalam proyek ini telah dikembangkan pembelajaran berbasis kerja investigasi untuk membangun kerja ilmiah siswa, dan selanjutnya untuk meningkatkan literasi siswa secara utuh. Penelitian dengan metode kuasi eksperimen ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan satu kelas eksperimen dan satu kelas kontrol yang diasumsikan memiliki homogenitas yang sama. Kerja ilmiah siswa diukur dengan penilaian fortofolio keterampilan proses, menggunakan instrumen lembar observasi dan angket, serta format wawancara/lisan. Literasi sains diukur dengan menggunakan instrumen tes pilihan berganda beralasan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kerja investigasi dapat mendorong siswa untuk belajar lebih bermakna dan menyebabkan keterampilan proses siswa terlatih. Lebih lanjut pembelajaran yang mengakomodasi belajar aktif siswa dapat meningkatkan literasi sains siswa.

Do scientific inquiry within group investigation enhance scientific work and science literacy of student?


Abstract

Dynamic electricity is one of the difficult topic of science for secondary school student. Lack of teacher innovation and less practicing scientific work to student make the learning is not something awaited and meaningless. The dynamic electricity learning based on group investigation on using scientific inquiry approach has developed to build students' scientific work skills. By the project, it was also learnt the enhance of students' science literacy as an impact of the treatment. The quasi experimental methods was used with the control group pre-posttest designed. The two groups of student were used, one group as a control class, and the other group was the experimental class. The two groups were choosen based on the homogenity of learning achievement. The scientific work skills were assessed on using portopolio of students' process skills (observation sheet, questionaire, and interview). The science literacy was assessed on using multiple choice test elaborated with the description/reason. The research shows that group investigation with scientific inquiry drove student to learn meaningfull and it led to the enhancing of students' science process skills. Moreover, students' science literacy can be improved through the active student learning.

First Page

149

Last Page

157

Page Range

149-157

Issue

2

Volume

4

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jipi.v4i2.20780

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi/article/view/20780

References

Allchin, D. (2014). From science studies to scientific literacy: a view from the classroom. Science and Education, 23(9), 1911-1932

Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Project based learning integrated to stem to enhance elementary school's students scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 261-267. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5493

Al-Rsa'i, M. S. (2013). Promoting scientific literacy by using ICT in science teaching. International Education Studies, 6(9), 175.

Becker, K & Park, K. (2011). The communication in science inquiry Project (CSIP): A Project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of Science classroom discourse communities. International journal of environmental and science education. 12(5-6), 23-37.

Baker, D. R., Lewis, E. B., Purzer, S., Watts, N. B., Perkins, G., Uysal, S., "¦ Lang, M. (2009). The Communication in Science Inquiry Project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 259-274. Retrieved from https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/the-communication-in-science-inquiry-project-cisip-a-project-to-e

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A

Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students' science literacy through reading infusion. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383051

Fibonacci, A., & Sudarmin, S. (2014). Development fun-chem learning materials integrated socio-science issues to increase students' scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 11(3), 708-713

Chin, C & Brown, D. (2000). Learning in science: a comparison of deep and surface approach. Journal of Science Research in Science Teaching, 37, 109-138

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L

Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education, 98(4), 549-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21115

Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education, 8th edition, New York, NY.: Mc.Graw Hill

Hairida, H. (2016). The effectiveness using inquiry based natural science module with authentic assessment to improve the critical thinking and inquiry skills of junior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 209-215. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.7681

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275-288

Ismail, I., Permanasari, A., & Setiawan, W. (2016). STEM virtual lab: An alternative practical media to enhance students' scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 239-246. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5492

Lederman, N.G., Lederman, J.S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.

Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2009). Promoting Scientific Literacy using a socio-critical and problem oriented approach to chemistry teaching concept, examples, and experiences. International journal of environmental and science education. 4(3), 231-245

Mc.Cright, A.M. (2012). Enhancing Students' scientific and quantitative literacies through an inquiry based learning project on climate change. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 12(4), 86-102

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Result in focus: What 15-year old know and what they can do with what they know? Paris: OECD Publishing.

Rubini, B & Permanasari, A. (2014). The Development of Contextual Model with Collaborative Strategy in Basic Science Course to Enhance Students' Scientific Literacy. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(6), 52-58.

Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., Pursitasari, I., & Permana, I. (2016). Identify scientific literacy from the science teachers' perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 299-303. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.7689

Suryaneza, H., & Permanasari, A. (2016). Penerapan pembelajaran IPA terpadu menggunakan model webbed untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa. EDUSAINS, 8(1), 36-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1718

Trefil, J., & Hazen, R. M. (2007). The sciences: An integrated approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Yuenyong, C., & Narjaikaew, P. (2009). Scientific literacy and Thailand science education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 335-349. Retrieved from http://www.ijese.net/makale/1399

Download

Share

COinS