Keywords
tes, critical thinking, dan practical skill
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengembangkan instrumen penilaian berupa tes pilihan ganda critical thinking dan practical skill yang valid dan reliabel (2) memetakan critical thinking dan practical skill peserta didik SMP. Prosedur pengembangan dalam penelitian ini mengacu pada langkah-langkah model prosedural dari Model 4D Thiagarajan. Hasil penelitian adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Instrumen penilaian IPA berupa tes pilihan ganda terdiri atas 36 item yang fit. Instrumen penilaian IPA berupa tes pilihan ganda telah memenuhi validitas isi dengan expert jugdement yang dibuktikan dengan perolehan indeks kesepakatan (indeks Aiken) yang berada pada rentang angka 0,8 hingga 1,00. Kegiatan uji coba (uji empiris) dilakukan pada 121 peserta didik. Reliabilitas instrumen penilaian IPA mengalami peningkatan dari 0,95 menjadi 0,97. (2) Secara umum, terdapat 92 dari 220 didik atau 41,82% yang memiliki kemampuan critical thinking dan pratical skill di atas rata-rata. Pada kemampuan critical thinking sebagian besar berada pada kategori rendah dan sangat rendah mencapai 49,55% sedangkan pada kemampuan pratical skillsebagian besar berada pada kategori sedang 43,64%.
Kata Kunci: tes, critical thinking dan practical skill
Developing Science Assessment Instrument to Map Critical Thinking and Practical Skill of Junior High School Students
Abstract
The study aims to (1) to developing a valid and reliable assessment instrument in the form of multiple choice test of critical thinking and practical skill and (2) to mapping critical thinking and practical skill of Junior High School Students. This study was research and development (R & D) that refers to Thiagarajan 4D Model. The result of this study are (1) assessment instrument in the form of multiple choice test consist of 36 fit items. The assessment instrument in the form of multiple choice test is already comply with content validity that be proven with Aiken's index from 0.8 to 1.00. 121 students is be responden in small-scale tryout. Item reliability increases from 0.95 to 0.97. (2) Mapping result image shows that there are 92 out of 220 students (41.82%) who have critical thinking and practical skill in over average. Almost the Pilot Project Junior High School students have critical thinking ability in low and very low category that is 49.55% whereas they have practical skill ability in average category that is 43.64%. Keywords: test, critical thinking and practical skill
First Page
213
Last Page
222
Page Range
213-222
Issue
2
Volume
2
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jipi.v2i2.11963
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi/article/view/11963
Recommended Citation
Dewi, N. D., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian IPA untuk memetakan critical thinking dan practical skill peserta didik SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.11963
References
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara
Azwar, S. (2015). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Chijioke, P. O., & Okoye, R. K. (2012). Development and Validation of Instrument for Assessing Practical Skills in Building Electronics Systems in Nigerian Technical Colleges. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS) Scholarlink Research Institute Journals, 779-785.
Costa, A. L. (1988). Developing Minds A Resourse Book for Teaching Thinking. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Dani, D. (2009). Scientific Literacy and Purpose for Teaching Science: A Case Study of Lebanese Private School Teachers. Internastional Journal of Environmental & Science Education Vol. 4, No. 3, 289-299.
Gurria, A. (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Fokus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they can do. Programme for International Student Assessment. OECD .
Fahim, M., & Masouleh, S. N. (2012). Critical Thinking in Higher Education: A Pedagogical Look. Theory and Practice in Language Studies Vol.2 No.7 July 2012, 1370-1375.
Friedel, C., Irani, T., Rudd, R., Gallo, M., Eckhardt, E., & Ricketts, J. (2008). Overtly Teaching Critical Thinking And Inquiry-Based Learning: A Comparition of Two Undergraduate Biotechnology Classes. Journal of Agricultural Education Volume 49 Number 1, 72-84.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud No 65 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Lock, R. (1990). Assessment of Practical Skill Part 1: The Relationships between Component Skills. Reaseacrh in Science and Technology Education Vol. 7 No.1., 221-233.
Marmiyanah. (2011). Menyusun Soal Tes Objektif: Bentuk Pilihan Ganda (Constructing Objective Test Items: Multiple-Choice Form). Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sriwijaya Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia .
Martin, O. M., Mullis, V. I., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2011). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2011 International Result in Science. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center
Ministry of Education of Malaysia. (2002). Integrate Curriculum for Secondary Schools: Curriculum Specification Science Form 2. . Malaysia: Curriculum Development Centre Ministry of Education Malaysia.
PISA. (2013). PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework
Reynolds, C. L. (2009). Measurement and Assessment in Education, Second Edition. New Jersey: Pearson.
Salim, R., M., P., & S, M. D. (2012). Assessing Students' Practical Skills in Basic Electronic Laboratory based on Psychomotor Domain Model. International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (ICTLHE 2012). Malaysia: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 56 ( 2012 ) 546 - 555.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
