Keywords
keterlaksanaan, mata pelajaran fisika, penilaian autentik
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mendeskripsikan keterlaksanaan penilaian autentik pada mata pelajaran fisika SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Sleman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY), (2) meng-identifikasi kendala keterlaksanaan penilaian autentik pada mata pelajaran fisika SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Sleman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, dan (3) mendeskripsikan hubungan kebijakan kepala sekolah dan pelatihan yang telah diterima pendidik terhadap keterlaksanaan penilaian autentik. Teknik pengumpulan data penelitian ini terdiri atas: angket, observasi, dan wawancara terhadap kepala sekolah, pendidik, dan peserta didik. Validitas instrumen penelitian diperoleh melalui expert judgments oleh dosen ahli. Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Keterlaksanaan penilaian autentik mata pelajaran SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Sleman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta kategori baik. (2) Kendala keterlaksanaan penilaian autentik mata pelajaran fisika SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Sleman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta meliputi jenis materi, waktu, kondisi sekolah, dan kemampuan pendidik yang dipengaruhi oleh beban kerja pendidik. (3) Hubungan kebijakan kepala sekolah terhadap keterlaksanaan penilaian autentik kategori kuat, dan tidak terdapat hubungan antara pelatihan yang telah diterima pendidik dan keterlaksanaan penilaian autentik.
Kata Kunci: keterlaksanaan, mata pelajaran fisika, penilaian autentik
The Feasibility of Authentic Assessment on Physics Subject at State Senior High Schools
Abstract
This research aims to: (1) describe the feasibility of authentic assessment on physics subject at state senior high schools in Sleman regency Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY), (2) identify the obstacles of the feasibility of authentic assessment on physics subject at state senior high schools in Sleman regency Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, and (3) describe the correlation between the headmaster's policy and teacher training to feasibility of authentic assessment. The data were collected through: questionnaire, observation, and interview with headmasters, teachers, and students. The validity of research instrument was measured by expert judgements. The results of this study are as follow. (1) The feasibility of authentic assessment on physics subject at state senior high schools in Sleman regency Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta is in good category. (2) The obstacles of the feasibility of authentic assessment on physics subject at state senior high schools in Sleman regency Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta include materials, time, school condition, and teacher's ability which is affected by workload. (3) The correlation between headmaster's policy and feasibility authentic assessment is in strong category, and there is no relationship between teacher training and authentic assessment implementation. Keywords: authentic assessment, feasibility, physics subject
First Page
111
Last Page
121
Page Range
111-121
Issue
1
Volume
2
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jipi.v2i1.8382
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi/article/view/8382
Recommended Citation
Rukmana, T., & Mundilarto, M. (2016). Keterlaksanaan penilaian autentik mata pelajaran fisika SMA negeri. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(1), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i1.8382
References
Azim, S., & Khan, M. (2012, May). Authentic assessment: An instructional tool to enhance students learning. Academic Research International, 2(3), 314-320. Retrieved July 10, 2014
Azwar, S. (2015). penyusunan skala psikologi (edisi 2). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bakri, N. A. (2012). Administrators' leadership effectiveness in high performance schools: A change. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 2(5), 9-15.
Bubb, S., & Earley, P. (2005). Managing teacher workload, work-life blance wellbeing. Oliver's Yard, London: PCP Paul Chapman Publising.
Cordell, R. M., & Fisher, L. F. (2010, April 15). Reference questions as an authentic assessment of information literacy. Franklin D. Schurz Library, Indiana University South Bend, South Bend, Indiana, USA, Emerald Group Publising Limited (www.emeraldinsight.com/0090-7324.htm), 38, 474-481.
Depdiknas. (2003). UU Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Depdiknas. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Re-publik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tetang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kepala Sekolah/ Madrasah.
Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.
Education's, t. M. (2010). Teacher performance appraisal - technical requirements manual. Ontarlo.
Frey, et al. (2012, January). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 17(2), 1-18.
Jameson, J. (2006). Leadership in post compulsory education , inspiring leaders of the future. Chiswick High Road, London: David Fulton Publishers.
Jones, V. F., & Jones, L. S. (1998). Comprehensive classroom management (fifth edition). Needham Height, Mass, USA: Allyn & Bacon.
Kemdikbud. (2013). Model penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik sma (sekolah menengah atas). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktoran Jenderal Pendidikan Menengah Direktorat Pembinaan SMA.
Kemdikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.
Kemdikbud. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Penddikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.
Lukum, A. (2013). Evaluation of science learning supervision on secondary schools. International Journal of Education, 5(4), 61-81.
MacLeod, K. (2013, July 16). Physics education and stse (science, technology, society, and environment): Perspectives from the literature. European J of Physics Education (EJPE), 4(4), 1-12.
Majid, A. (2008). Perencanaan pembelajaran mengembangkan standar kompetensi guru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Bandung.
Mundilarto. (2012). Penilaian hasil belajar fisika. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Newmann, et al. (2007). Authentic instruction and assessment (common standarfor rigot and relevance in teaching academic subjects). Chicago: The Iowa Department of Education.
Nitko, A. J., & Broohart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students, (sixth edition). Boston: Pearson.
Nitko, A. J., & Broohart, S. M.. (2007). Educational assessment of students (fifth edition). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Nurdin, M., & Usman, H. (2013). Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dasar Negeri 1 Taliwan Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(2). 205-218
Reynolds, et al. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Singh, C., Moin, L., & Schunn, C. D. (2010). Introduction to physics teaching for science and engineering undergraduates. Journal of Physics Teacher Education, 5(3), 1-34.
Subadi, et al. (2013). A lesson study as a development model of proffesional teachers. International Journal of Education, 5(2), 102-114.
Sugiono. (2012). Stastika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Triatno. (2008). Mendesain pembelajaran kontekstual (contextual teaching and learning) di kelas. Jakarta: Cerdas Pustaka Publisher.
Vescio, V., & Dorene Ross, A. A. (2007). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, (24), 80-91.
