Pengembangan performance assessment untuk mengukur dan memetakan practical skills IPA siswa pada guided-PjBL di SMP

Authors

Siska Pratama, Program Studi Pendidikan Sains, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Jalan Colombo No. 1, Karangmalang, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
Dadan Rosana, Program Studi Pendidikan Sains, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Jalan Colombo No. 1, Karangmalang, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

Keywords

performance assessment, lembar observasi, guided-PjBL, practical skills IPA

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengetahui karakteristik performance assessment yang valid dan reliabel untuk mengukur practical skills IPA pada guided-PjBL, (2) mendeskripsikan practical skills IPA yang muncul pada guided-PjBL, dan (3) mengetahui peta practical skills IPA siswa SMP menggunakan performance assessment. Penelitian ini merupakan Research & Development dengan menggunakan model 4-D Thiagarajan, et al. (1974). Subjek uji coba adalah siswa kelas VII di SMPN 1 Wonosari, SMPN 4 Playen, dan SMPN 5 Ngawen.Teknik pengambilan data meliputi wawancara, angket, dan nontes. Instrumen pengambilan data meliputi pedoman wawancara, lembar angket, dan lembar observasi. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu performance assessment dalam bentuk lembar observasi dinyatakan valid dan reliabel. Practical skills IPAyang muncul pada guided-PjBL meliputi: merancang proyek; menggunakan termometer dan indikator universal; membaca hasil pengukuran suhu dan pH; membuat tabel; menentukan variabel bebas dan terikat; membuat grafik; mengetahui hubungan antar-variabel; dan membuat kesimpulan. Siswa pada sekolah kategori tinggi memiliki tingkat kemampuan practical skills paling tinggi bila dibandingkan dengan siswa pada sekolah kategori sedang dan rendah. Siswa pada sekolah kategori sedang memiliki tingkat kemampuan practical skills paling rendah.

Kata Kunci: performance assessment, lembar observasi, guided-PjBL, practical skills IPA

Developing Performance Assessment to Map Science Practical Skills on Guided-PjBL

Abstract

This study aims to: (1)find out the characteristic of performance assessment that is valid and reliable to measure science practical skills on guided-PjBL, (2) describe science practical skills that appear on guided-PjBL, and (3) find out the map student's science practical skills in junior high school to use performance assessment on guided-PjBL. This was a research and development study employing the development model by Thiagarajan et al. (1974).The tryout subjects were junior high school student in SMPN 1 Wonosari, SMPN 4 Playen, and SMPN 5 Ngawen. The data were collected through interviews, questionnaires, and nontests. The data collecting instruments included an interview guided, validation questionnaire sheets, and observation sheets. The result of the study was the product of performance assessment in observation sheet form was valid and reliable. Science practical skills that appear on guided-PjBL. included: designing project; using thermometre and universal indicator; reading temperature and pH measurement; creating table; defining independent-dependent variable; creating graph; find out relation between variable; and drawing conclusion. The students in the school with the high category have the highest science practical skills of the three schools. The students in the school with the low category have higher science practical skills than students in high grade school. Keywords: performance assessment, observation sheet, guided-PjBL, science practical skills

First Page

100

Last Page

110

Page Range

100-110

Issue

1

Volume

2

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jipi.v2i1.8372

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi/article/view/8372

Recommended Citation

Pratama, S., & Rosana, D. (2016). Pengembangan performance assessment untuk mengukur dan memetakan practical skills IPA siswa pada guided-PjBL di SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(1), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i1.8372

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of rating. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142.

Azwar, S. (2015). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4 ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Baker, E., Breanna, T., Otto, P., Tudor, M., & Ferguson, L. (2011). Project-based-learning model, relevant learning for the 21th century. Washington D.C: Pacific Education Institute.

Bagheri, M., Ali, W. Z., Chong, M., & Daud, S. M. (2013). Effect of project-based learning strategy on self-directed learning skills of educational technology students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4, 15-29.

Bender, W. N. (2012). Project based learning, differentiating instruction for the 21st century.Kalifornia: Corwin.

Central Board of Secondary Education. (2009). Assessment of practical skills in Science. Delhi: Central Board of Secondary Education.

Craw, K. G. (2009). Performance assessment practices: a case study of science teacher in a suburban high school setting. Disertasi doktor, Columbia University.

Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-undang RI nomor 20 tahun 2003, tentang sistem guruan nasional.

Presiden. (2005). Peraturan pemerintah RI nomor 19 tahun 2005, tentang standar nasional guruan.

Guo, S., & Yang, Y. (2012). project-based-learning: an effective approach to link teacher professional development and student learning. Journal Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 5, 41-56.

Hampton, C. (2002). Teaching practical skills. Canada: Commonwealth of Learning.

Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Keser, H., & Karahoca, D. (2010). Designing a project management e-course by using project based learning. Sciense Direct, 2, 5744-5754.

Kunandar. (2014). Penilaian autentik (penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Lock, R. (1989). Assessment of practical skills part 1. the relationships between component skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 7 (2), 221-233. Doi: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0263514890070209

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.

Mcgrath, D. (2002). Getting started with project based learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 30, 130-136.

Mihardi, S. (2013). The effect of project based learning model with kwl worksheet on student creative thinking process in physics problems. Journal of Education and Practice, 4.

Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Groundlund, N. E. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Ohao: Merrill Publishing Company.

Paige, R. M. (2005). Internatioalization of higher education: performance assessment and indicator. University of Minnesota, College of Education and Human Development.

Patton, A. (2012). Work that Matter: The teacher's guide to project-based-learning. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.

Pickens, B. C., Lancaster, C., Scaefgen, B., James, R. K., & Constantine, D. (2012). Project based learning: enriching counselor education through real world learning. Article VISTAS, 1, 1-12.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susila, I. K. (2012). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian unjuk kerja (performance assessment) laboraturium pada mata pelajaran fisika sesuai Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Guruan SMA kelas X di Kabupaten Gianyar. Artikel . Diambil pada tanggal 17 Oktober 2014 dari http://pasca.undiksa.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/jurnal_ep/article/download/375/167

The George Lucas Educational Foundation. (2005). Instructional module project based learning. Diambil pada tanggal 16 Oktober 2014 dari http://www.edutopia.org/modules/PBL/whatpbl.php

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children. leadership trining institute/ special education: minneapolis. Minnesota: University Of Minneasota.

van Helvoort, J. (2010). A scoring rubric for performance assessment of information literacy in Dutch higher education. Journal of Information Literacy, 4, 22-39.

Watts, A. (2013). The assessment of practical science: a literature review. Cambridge Assessment .

Widoyoko, E. P. (2014). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wisconsin Education Association Council. (1996). Performance assessment. Education Issues Series.

Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7, 3-14.

Wood, R., Ferguson, & Carolyn, M. (1975). Teacher assessment of practical skills in a-level chemistry. School Science Review, 56, 605-608.

Woodley, E. (2009). Practical work in school science-why is it important? Article School Science Review, 91, 49-51.

Wren, D. G. (2009). Performance assessment: a key component of a balanced assessment system. Report from the Departement of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment, 2, 1-12.

Zainul, A. (2001). Alternative assessment. Jakarta: PAU-PPAI, Universitas Terbuka.

Zitzewitz. (2004). Alternative assessment in the science classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.