Keywords
system requirement, e-learning, academic writing, kano
Document Type
Article
Abstract
This paper outlines a system requirement of proposed e-learning design for English course particularly in academic writing. However, the system requirement is focused on functional requirement. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out an intensive interaction involving systems analysts and end-users to obtain the appropriate learning materials needed by the engineering students. The instrument of this research is interview and questionnaire. The former was elaborated by the English teachers, while the latter was collected from engineering students at Politeknik Kota Malang. The data collection is analyzed using Kano's method. The research findings indicates that the functional requirement consists of 3 parts: 1) academic writing, 2) quizzes, and 3) writing template. The academic writing is focused on how to write abstract. Meanwhile, the quizzes cover grammar, paraphrasing, and abstract organization. This application comes with an abstract template as well, which can be downloaded and printed as required affiliation.
Page Range
33-39
Issue
1
Volume
8
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jpv.v8i1.17043
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv/article/view/17043
Recommended Citation
Sari, D. L., & Niswatin, C. (2018). System requirement analysis for e-learning materials to support academic writing skills for engineering students of vocational higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 8(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v8i1.17043
References
Adnan, Z., & Zifirdaus, I. (2005). Merebut hati audiens internasional. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Berger, C., Blauth, R., Bolster, C., Burchill, G., DuMouchel, W., Pouliot, F., … Walden, D. (1993). Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. The Center for Quality Management Journal, 2(4), 33–36.
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (1999). Writing academic english; (3rd.). United States of America: Pearson.
Saubani, A. (2016) Jumlah peneliti dan publikasi penelitian masih rendah. Koran Republika, edisi 3 Maret 2016
Setiyaningsih, Y. (2008). Peningkatan kemampuan menulis argumentatif dan keterampilan berpikir kritis berbahasa indonesia mahasiswa melalui model pembelajaran berdasarkan logika toulmin. EDUCATIONIST, (II)2.
Sunnah A, Sukoco. (2014). Evaluasi pelaksanaan program Seamolec di SMK daerah istimewa yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, (4)2. Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv/article/view/2542
Susanti, A. (2013). Pengembangan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe CIRC untuk meningkatkan kemampuan menulis bahasa Inggris mahasiswa D3 administrasi negara FIS UNESA. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/article/7950/9 0/article.pdf
Waloyo, E. (2017). The implementation of mind mapping technique in teaching writing: A case study at MAN 13 Jakarta. ELT-Echo, (2)1.
Yamin, M. (2013). Improving writing example essays of the fifth semester students in the english department of fkip unlam through process-writing technique. Cendekia, (11)2.
Xiou, G., & Chen, X. (2015). English academic writing difficulties of engineering students at tertiary level in China. World Transaction on Engineering and Technology Education, (13)3.
Xu, F. (2012). Teaching and researching english writing. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
