•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Abstract

The purposes of this study were: 1) to obtain evaluation instrument of vocational high school history certified teacher's performance, and 2) to know the level performance of vocational high school certified teacher. This study used descriptive quantitative method. Validator of this study were 6 evaluation experts where in the operational trial consists of 3 vocational school teachers, 3 principals, and 60 students of SMK I Yogyakarta, SMK 1 Sewon Bantul, and SMK 2 Sewon Bantul. The result of the study shows that (1) the performance assessment instrument of certified history teachers is declared eligible by the experts with a mean score of 4.23 and have a good readability with a score of 4.12 (assessed by three principals, three teachers and six students); (2) the performance level of vocational history teacher who has been certified educator in Yogyakarta showed the average score of 4.20, which categorized as excellent. Based on the assessment, the score was 4.28 assessed by teachers or categorized as excellent; 4.26 assessed by principals or categorized as excellent; and 4.12 assessed by students or categorized as good. While, the teacher's performance level in: planning component showed a score of 4.22 or categorized as excellent; teaching and learning implementation component showed 4.20 or categorized as excellent; and learning evaluation component showed a score of 4.19 or categorized as good.

Keywords: instrument, historical teacher performance, vocational, certified teacher profession

PENILAIAN KINERJA GURU SEJARAH SEKOLAH MENENGAH KEJURUAN BERSERTIFIKAT PENDIDIK

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) memperoleh instrumen penilaian kinerja guru sejarah SMK yang sudah bersertifikat pendidik yang layak, dan (2) mengetahui tingkat kinerja guru sejarah SMK yang sudah bersertifikat pendidik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif. Validator dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 6 orang pakar evaluasi, dan dalam uji operasional lapangan terdiri dari 3 guru SMK, 3 kepala sekolah, dan 60 siswa yang diambil dari SMK I Yogyakarta, SMK 1 Sewon Bantul, dan SMK 2 Sewon Bantul. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) instrumen penilaian kinerja guru sejarah SMK yang sudah bersertifikat pendidik di nyatakan layak oleh para ahli dengan rerata skor sebesar 4.23 dan memiliki keterbacaan yang baik skor 4.12 berdasarkan penilaian 3 kepala sekolah, 3 guru dan 6 siswa, (2) tingkat kinerja guru sejarah SMK yang sudah bersertifikat pendidik di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta menunjukkan rerata skor 4.20 yang berarti kinerja guru sangat baik. Berdasarkan hasil penilaian guru rerata skor menunjukkan 4.28 atau sangat baik, kepala sekolah 4.26 sangat baik, dan hasil penilaian siswa 4.12 atau kriteria baik. Sedangkan secara keseluruhan kinerja guru komponen perencanaan memperoleh skor 4.22 kategori sangat baik, komponen pelaksanaan pembelajaran 4.20 kategori sangat baik, dan komponen evaluasi pembelajaran sebesar 4.19 atau kategori baik. Kata kunci: instrumen, kinerja guru sejarah, SMK, profesi pendidik

Page Range

56-63

Issue

1

Volume

7

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jpv.v7i1.12604

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv/article/view/12604

References

Akinola, O. B. (2013). Principals’ leadership skills and school effectiveness: the case of South Western Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v3n5p26

Burden, P. R., & Byrd, D. M. (1999). Method for effective teaching. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). How teacher performance assessments can measure and improvteaching. Americanprogress.org: Center for American Progress.

Elliott, K. (2015). Teacher performance appraisal: more about performance or development? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(40), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n9. 6

Mardapi, D. (2011). Pengembangan instrumen dan kisi-kisinya. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. (California, Ed.) (2nd ed.). Sage Publication.

Nadeem, M., Rana, M. S., Lone, A. H., Maqbool, S., Naz, K., & Ali, A. (2011). Teacher’s competencies and factors affecting the performance of female teachers in Bahawalpur (Southern Punjab) Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(19). Retrieve from http://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_1 9_Special_Issue_October_2011/27.pdf

Oriondo, L. L., & Antonio, E. M. D. (1998). Evaluating educational outcomes (test, measurement and evaluation). Florentino St: Rex Printing Company, Inc.

Parkes, K. A. (2010). Performance assessment: lessons from performers. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(1).

Rasheed, S. (2000). Defining quality in education. In A paper presented by UNICEF at the meeting of The International Working Group on Education Florence, Italy. New York, NY.

Rubio, M. C. (2009). Effective teachers – Professional and personal skills. Revista de La Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 24.

Schacter, J. (n.d.). Teacher performance- based accountability: why, what and how. Milken Family Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.mff.org/pubs/performance- assessment. pdf.

Stark, J. S., & Thomas, A. (1994). Assessment and program evaluation. Needham Heights: Simon and Schuster Custom Publishing.

Wahyudi, K. . E., Supranoto, & Suji. (2012). Measuring Performance of Teacher Certification Program. International Journal of Administrative Science & Organization, 19(3), 153–161.

Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2007). Pengembangan model evaluasi pembelajaran IPS di SMP. Yogyakarta: Disertasi Program Pasca Sarjana Program Studi Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Yan, S. (2012). Teachers’ roles in autonomous learning. Journal of Sociological Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2860

Yariv, E. (2011). Deterioration in teachers’ performance: causes and some remedies. World Journal of Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n1p81

Download

Share

COinS