Keywords
needs analysis, English teaching materials, vocational college
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Needs analysis as an initial process in a course becomes crucial before deciding learning objectives, setting the assessment, creating course design, as well as developing materials. This study aims to describe the English competence and skills needed by the stakeholders and students' perceptions of good teaching materials from various study programs at Vocational College UGM. The methods used in collecting data are questionnaires and interviews. The questionnaire is distributed to the first semester students from all applied bachelor programs in Vocational College UGM using a stratified random sampling method. In addition, the interview is done with all heads of applied bachelor programs in Vocational College UGM for triangulation. The results show that the students are in the beginner level or basic users (A2 level in Common European Framework of Reference for Languages or CEFR). Moreover, the competencies stated in the A2 level are considered needed by the students to master in academic and work-life contexts. Besides, the skill considered as the most important is speaking, followed by writing. The students also propose some criteria of good teaching materials that include the content, sequence, exercise, language features, technology, layout, and price.
Page Range
138-149
Issue
2
Volume
10
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jpv.v10i2.27934
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv/article/view/27934
Recommended Citation
Harnita Sari, Y. I., Wienanda, W. K., & Nugraheni, N. E. (2020). Needs analysis to develop teaching materials at Vocational College UGM. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 10(2), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v10i2.27934
References
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Pincas, A., & Hill, P. (2003). Teaching English as a foreign language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In Jack C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 1-47). Routledge.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/168045b15e
Dooey, P. (2010). Students' perspectives of an EAP pathway program. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 184-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.013
Driscoll, A., & Wood, S. (2007). Developing outcomes-based assessment for learner-centered education: A faculty introduction. Stylus Publishing.
Educational Testing Service. (2012). TOEFL ITP - CEFR executive summary update with section scores. ETS Global. https://www.etsglobal.org/content/download/1413/24826/version/4/file/TOEFL+ITP+CEFR+executive+summary+update+with+section+scores.pdf
Hamid, M. A., Aribowo, D., & Desmira, D. (2017). Development of learning modules of basic electronics-based problem solving in Vocational Secondary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 7(2), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v7i2.12986
Huang, L.-S. (2010). Seeing eye to eye? The academic writing needs of graduate and undergraduate students from students' and instructors' perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 517-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375372
Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
Lambert, C. (2010). A task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809346520
Li, J. (2014). Needs analysis: An effective way in business English curriculum design. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(9), 1869-1874. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.9.1869-1874
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Litz, D. R. A. (2001). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study. The Asian EFL Journal, 1-53. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/thesis/textbook-evaluation-and-elt-management-a-south-korean-case-study/
Llurda, E. (2000). On competence, proficiency, and communicative language ability. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2000.tb00141.x
Long, M. H. (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Looney, J. (2008). Teaching, learning and assessment for adults: Improving foundation skills. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Nunan, D. (2001). Second language acquisition. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (4th ed., pp. 87-92). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.013
Poedjiastutie, D., & Oliver, R. (2017). English learning needs of ESP learners: Exploring stakeholder perceptions at an Indonesian University. TEFLIN Journal, 28(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v28i1/1-21
Renandya, W. A., Hamied, F. A., & Joko, N. (2018). English language proficiency in Indonesia: Issues and prospects. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 15(3), 618-629. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.4.618
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum design in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Stoller, F. L., Horn, B., Grabe, W., & Robinson, M. S. (2006). Evaluative review in materials development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(3), 174-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.07.003
Sudijono, A. (2009). Pengantar statistik pendidikan. Rajawali Pers.
Triyono, M. B. (2016). Pengembangan isi kurikulum pendidikan teknik alat berat berbasis kebutuhan industri. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 6(3), 355-363. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v6i3.12159
Zohoorian, Z. (2015). A needs analysis approach: An investigation of needs in an EAP context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(1), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0501.07