teaching factory, industrial learning, tutorial video learning media, video-based portfolio e-report skill

Document Type



This study aims to determine the success factors of the learning media of tutorial and skill e-report portfolios video-based in teaching factory learning outcomes in vocational high school. This study was the Research and Development model, through several stages, namely: (1) collecting data; (2) planning; (3) developing draft; (4) conducting initial trials; (5) revising the trial results; (6) conducting trial site research; (7) improving the productivity of the test results, (8) conducting test, (9) completing the final product; and (10) disseminating and implementing the result. This study was conducted at 58 Public Vocational High School, Jakarta. The samples were random sampling, consisting of 59 students majoring in painting and visual communication design in the control class and the experimental class. The instrument was a multiple-choice test sheet (multiple choice) through pre-test and post-test. The results of the study were analyzed using a t-test. The t-test average of the experimental class, Visual Communication Design, was 11.522. The t-test average of the control class was 10.832. Thus, the average learning outcomes of the experimental class were 0.69, which is bigger than in the control class. In the experimental class, Painting Class, the average learning outcome was 67, and the control class was 54.5. Therefore, there was a difference of 12.5. The hypothesis stated that there were differences in teaching factory learning resulted from the pre-test and post-test experimental classes majoring in Painting and Visual Communication Design. The instructional media of Tutorials and Skill E-Report Portfolio Video-Based got very good responses from students.

Page Range






Digital Object Identifier (DOI)





Abele, E., Metternich, J., Tisch, M., Chryssolouris, G., Sihn, W., ElMaraghy, H., Hummel, V., & Ranz, F. (2015). Learning factories for research, education, and training. Procedia CIRP, 32(Clf), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.187

Al Mamun, M. A. (2014). Effectiveness of audio-visual aids in language teaching in tertiary level [Doctoral thesis. BRAC University, Dhaka]. http://dspace.bracu.ac.bd/xmlui/handle/10361/3288

Azer, S. A. (2009). Interactions between students and tutor in problem-based learning: The significance of deep learning. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 25(5), 240-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70068-3

Baena, F., Guarin, A., Mora, J., Sauza, J., & Retat, S. (2017). Learning factory: The path to industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.022

Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., & Rentzos, L. (2016). The teaching factory: A manufacturing education paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 57, 44-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.009

Comiskey, D., & McCartan, K. (2011). Video: An effective teaching aid? An architectural technologist's perspective. Transactions, 8(1), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.11120/tran.2011.08010025

Cvetkova, B., Andonovska-Trajkovska, D., & Atanasoska, T. (2010). Values of some strategies of teaching and learning in fine art education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2841-2845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.425

Jaber, M. Y., Glock, C. H., & Zanoni, S. (2018). A learning curve with improvement in process quality. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 681-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.397

Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). The teaching factory paradigm: Developments and outlook. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.029

Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2019). The teaching factory network: A new collaborative paradigm for manufacturing education. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 398-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.062

Mourtzis, D., Zogopoulos, V., & Vlachou, E. (2018). Augmented reality supported product design towards industry 4.0: A teaching factory paradigm. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.018

Prinz, C., Morlock, F., Freith, S., Kreggenfeld, N., Kreimeier, D., & Kuhlenkötter, B. (2016). Learning factory modules for smart factories in industrie 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 54, 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.105

Reisinger, G., Trautner, T., Hennig, M., Alexandra, G. R., Mazak, T., Hold, P., Gerhard, D., & Mazak, A. (2019). TU Wien pilot factory industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 200-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.032

Rentzos, L., Doukas, M., Mavrikios, D., Mourtzis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2014). Integrating manufacturing education with industrial practice using teaching factory paradigm: A construction equipment application. Procedia CIRP, 17, 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.126

Sadiman, A. S., Rahardjo, R., Haryono, A., & Rahardjito, R. (2007). Media pendidikan: Pengertian, pengembangan dan pemanfaatannya. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Stavropoulos, P., Bikas, H., & Mourtzis, D. (2018). Collaborative machine tool design: The teaching factory paradigm. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.004

Stojkić, Ž., & Bošnjak, I. (2019). Development of learning factory at FSRE, University of Mostar. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.029

Sugiyono, S. (2009). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Summak, M. S., Samancio, M., & Ba, M. (2010). Technology integration and assesment in educational settings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1725-1729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.973

Tvenge, N., & Ogorodnyk, O. (2018). Development of evaluation tools for learning factories in manufacturing education. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.157

Wahjusaputri, S., Fitriani, S., & Syarif, S. (2019). Canvas model business as an innovation of teaching factory learning in the dashion department of 27 Public Vocational High School, Jakarta. Dinamika Pendidikan, 14(2), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v14i2.21167