•  
  •  
 

Keywords

pengembangan instrumen, miskonsepsi, kesetimbangan kimia

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengembangkan dan meng-hasilkan produk berupa Instrumen Pendeteksi Miskonsepsi Ke-setimbangan Kimia (IPMKK) pada peserta didik kelas XI SMA dengan uji kualitas IPMKKK berdasarkan expert judgment melalui Forum Group Discussion (FGD) dilanjutkan analisis Teori Res-pons Butir (TRB) tiga parameter dan uji fisibilitas penggunaan IPMKK. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan dengan model prosedural mengadaptasi prosedur pengembang-an Borg & Gall. Hasil analisis kebutuhan (need assessment) dan kaji pustaka dipilih materi pokok kesetimbangan kimia dan instrumen berbentuk tes pilihan ganda dengan alasan setengah-terbuka. Simpulan hasil penelitian ini adalah telah berhasil di-kembangkan IPMKK pada peserta didik kelas XI SMA. Hasil uji fisibilitas menunjukkan bahwa guru-guru kimia SMA tidak mengalami kesulitan dalam menerapkan IPMKK dan dapat mengikuti cara menganalisis data dengan mudah. IPMKK yang diterapkan di lapangan dapat mendeteksi terjadinya miskonsepsi kimia, yaitu miskonsepsi tipe Mi-1 sebesar 13,84% dan tipe Mi-2 sebesar 18,43% untuk tingkat Provinsi DIY.

Kata kunci: pengembangan instrumen, miskonsepsi, kesetimbangan kimia

______________________________________________________________

DEVELOPMENT OF A DETECTING INSTRUMENT CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUM MISCONCEPTION OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Abstract This research is aimed at developing a product in the form of a Chemical Equilibrium Misconception Detecting Instrument or IPMKK for Grade XI senior high school students to investigate the quality of IPMKK based on the expert judgment using the Focus Group Discussion (FGD), continued with an analysis using the three-parameter Item Response Theory (IRT) and the feasibility of IPMKK imple-mentation in the field. This research was a research and development study using the procedural model, adapted from Borg & Gall model. The development of the product began by conducting the needs assessment and the literature review to choose a chemical equilibrium and multiple choice test with half-open reason as the instrument to be developed. Findings suggest that this research succeeds in developing a Chemical Equilibrium Misconception Detecting Instrument (IPMKK) for Grade XI senior high school students. The feasibility test suggests that Senior High School chemistry teachers do not have difficulty in implementing the instrument and can conduct the data analysis easily. The implementation of the instrument in the DIY province detected that there was M1i-1 chemistry misconception by 13.84% Mi-1 and Mi-2 by 18.43%.

Keywords: instrument development, misconception, chemical equilibrium

First Page

232

Last Page

249

Issue

2

Volume

15

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v15i2.1095

References

Abraham, M. R, Grzybowski, E. B, Renner, J. W, et al. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105-120.

Amir, Frankl, & Tamir. (1987). Justifications of answers to multiple choice items as a means for identifying misconceptions. In Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Vol I. 15-25. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.

Berg, E., van den. (1991). Miskonsepsi fisika dan remidiasi. Salatiga: Universitas Satya Wacana.

Borg, W. R.& Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction, Fourth edition. New York : Longman, Inc.

Dierks, W, Weninger, J. & Herron, J. D. (1985). Mathematics in the chemistry classroom: Part 1. The special nature of quantity equations. Journal of Chemical Education, 62(10), 839-841.

Ditjen Dikti. (2008). Permendiknas No. 20/2008 tentang Standar Penilaian. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 548-554.

Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory. Boston, MA: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.

Herron, J. D. & Greenbowe, T. J. (1986). What can we do about Sue: A case study of competence. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(6), 528- 531.

Huddle, P. A. & Pillay, A. E. (1996). An in-depth study of misconceptions in stoichiometry and chemical equilibrium at a South African University. Journal of Research in Science Education, 33(1), 65-67.

Krishnan, Shanti R, & Howe, Ann C. (1994). The mole concept: Developing in instrument to assess conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(8), 653-655.

Mardapi, Djemari (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Yogyakarta Press.

Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191.

Sukardjo. (2008). Penilaian hasil belajar kimia. Diktat. Yogyakarta: FMIPA– UNY.

Sutiman., Salirawati, Das, & Permanasari, Lis. (2003). Identifikasi miskonsepsi konsep-konsep kimia SMA di Kabupaten Sleman. Laporan Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian UNY.

Suparno, Paul. (2005). Miskonsepsi & perubahan konsep pendidikan fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Treagust, D. (1987). An approach for helping students and teachers diagnose misconceptions in specific science content area. In Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Vol II. 519-520. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.

Utomo, Tjipto & Ruijter, Kees. (1994). Peningkatan dan pengembangan pendidikan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Download

Share

COinS