Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan was first published in 1998 and has been published biannually since 2004. Submitted articles must be original, not previously published, and not under review for possible publication in another journal. All manuscripts submitted will undergo a blind review process by qualified academics in the relevant field. This process may take several weeks or months.

Submitted manuscripts must be relevant and contribute to measurement, evaluation, assessment, and methodology in the context of education. Published articles may include empirical studies, policy analysis, assessment instrument development, program evaluation, test management, or meta-analyses using appropriate and precise methods, with significant results and practical relevance to improving the quality of education at various levels and systems.

The article that will be submitted in this journal should contain:

• Information of article: The article submitted to this journal must include clear and engaging information for readers. Remember that readers are also potential authors who may cite your article, so it is important to identify the main issue being discussed. The article title must be accurate, clear, specific, and complete, without using rarely understood abbreviations, and should not exceed 16 words. The authors' names should be written in full without titles, followed by their affiliations, including the study program and institution name. The corresponding author must provide their name and correct email address, and all contributing authors must be listed in the correct order for publication. Only the corresponding author needs to provide an email address. Each author’s full name must be written in the correct format, including or excluding middle names or initials as needed, and their affiliations must be listed correctly. The authorship criteria include substantial contributions to the design or conception of the research, data collection, analysis, or interpretation, drafting or critically revising the article for intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published, and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the research, ensuring that issues related to accuracy and integrity are properly investigated and resolved.
• Abstract: The abstract should be clear, concise, and descriptive. It should provide a brief introduction to the problem, the objective of the paper, followed by a statement regarding the methodology, and a brief summary of the results. The abstract should end with a comment on the significance of the results or a brief conclusion. Abstracts should be written in 11 pt Centaur, preferably not exceeding 300 words.
• Keywords: component, formatting, style, styling, insert (3-5 words)
• Introduction: In the Introduction, authors should state the objectives of the work at the end of the section. Before stating the objective, authors should provide adequate background and a very brief literature review to highlight existing solutions/methods, identify the best previous research, show the main limitations of previous research, and indicate the goals for overcoming those limitations. Additionally, the scientific merit or novelty of the paper should be demonstrated. Avoid a detailed literature review or summarizing the results.
• Methods: Materials and methods should provide enough detail for readers to reproduce the experiment. Provide sufficient details to allow the work to be reproduced. Methods that have been published previously should be cited; only relevant modifications should be described. Avoid repeating established methods in detail.
• Results and Discussion: Results should be clear and concise, summarizing scientific findings rather than providing extensive data. Highlight differences between your findings and those of other researchers. The discussion should explore the significance of the results, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is often appropriate. Avoid excessive citations and detailed discussions of the literature. This section is crucial for interpreting your data. Start with a brief summary of the main scientific findings (not experimental results). The following should be covered in the discussion: How do your results relate to the original question or objectives outlined in the Introduction (what)? Do you interpret each result scientifically (why)? Are your results consistent with other researchers' findings (what else), or are there discrepancies?
• Conclusion: Conclusions should answer the research objectives and explain how your work advances the field. Without clear conclusions, reviewers and readers will struggle to assess the work’s value and whether it warrants publication. Avoid repeating the abstract or listing experimental results. Provide a scientific justification for your work, including potential applications and extensions. Suggest future experiments or highlight those in progress.
• References: (Using APA-7 style)
  Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Publications. [Book]
  
  Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42 [Journal]
  
  Hasling, D.W., Clancey, W.J., Rennels, G.R. (1983). Strategic Explanations in Consultation. The International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 20(1): 3-19. [Journal]
  
  Kralj, A. L., & Solnet, D. J. (2011). The influence of perceived organizational support on engagement: A cross-generational investigation in the hospitality industry. 2011 International CHRIE Conference-Refereed Track. 9, 19. [Conference Proceeding]
  
  Rice, J. (2014). Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving, Technical Report, KSL-86-19, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford Univ. [Report]
  
  Clancey, W.J. (2013). Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue. PhD Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University. [Thesis]
  
  Ivey, K.C. (2 September 2012). Citing Internet sources URL http://www.eei- alex.com/eye/utw/96aug.html. [Website]
  
  It is suggested that authors use reference managers like MENDELEY or ZOTERO.

Guideline for Online Submission Authors must first register as an Author and/or Reviewer through this link.

User Rights
All articles published as Open Access will be immediately and permanently available to everyone for reading and downloading. We are working with the author community to define the best license options for this journal, currently being defined as:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
[Click Here to Download Article Template