•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Keywords

university admission system; entrance examination; academic achievement

Document Type

Article

Abstract

The study is aimed at finding the differences in students' academic achievement based on the admission system type to IAIN Batusangkar and the size of the contribution of admission systems to students' achievement. The study uses the quantitative research approach. The comparative multivariate technique is used for the data analysis. Subjects include 159 student candidates for the local-exam stream, 161 for the national-exam stream, and 123 for the achievement-based stream. Findings show that there is a significant difference in academic achievement between students admitted through the achievement stream and students admitted through the local and national-exam streams. There is no significant difference between the local-exam system and the national-exam system. The contribution of admission systems over academic achievement is 5.4%; specified: 5.2% for Semester I, 2.3% for Semester II, 3.8% for Semester III, 4.1% for Semester IV, and 4.4% for Semester V.

First Page

197

Last Page

207

Issue

2

Volume

22

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v22i2.22367

References

Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Azwar, S. (2007a). Dasar-dasar psikomentri. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2007b). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing(5th ed.). New York: Harper Dayan.

Ghani, A. R. A. (2008). Pengaruh tes formatif dan kemandirian belajar terhadap hasil belajar Ekonomi siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 12(2). Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep/article/view/1425

Gregory, R. J. (2013). Tes psikologi: sejarah, prinsip, dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Kartowagiran, B. (1998). Pengenalan metode penelitian eksperimen dan ex post facto. In Penataran Berbagai Pendekatan dan Metode Penelitian(p. 7). Yogyakarta: Lemlit IKIP Yogyakarta.

Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. New York: International Thomson Publishing Inc.

Mardapi, D. (1993). Daya prediksi tes masuk IKIP Jakarta terhadap prestasi dan lama studi mahasiswa Pascasarjana KPK IKIP Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.

Mehrens, W. A. (1980). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. Forth Worth: Holt, Rinerhart, and Winston, Inc.

Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Surapranata, S. (2006). Analisis, validitas, reliabilitas dan interpretasi hasil tes, implementasi kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suryabrata, S. (2004). Pengembangan sistem seleksi calon mahasiswa perguruan tinggi yang akurat dan berkeadilan. In Seminar Nasional Rekayasa Sistem Penilaian dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan(p. 3). Yogyakarta: Himpunan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia (HEPI).

Suryabrata, S. (2005). Pengembangan alat ukur psikologis. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Waluyo, W. (2006). Pengaruh pendekatan konstruktivistik dan gaya belajar siswa terhadap prestasi belajar Kimia siswa kelas I semester 2 SMA Negeri 1 Ngaglik Sleman tahun pelajaran 2003/2004. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 8(1). Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep/article/view/2016

Download

Share

COinS