•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Keywords

honesty character; mathematics; subject scaling

Document Type

Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a scale to measure honesty characters of students on mathematics learning using sucject scaling model. This development research is carried out in several steps namely: preparing initial scales, trials, and interpretation of trials result. The research is conducted on students of SMP N 5 Yogyakarta, SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Yogyakarta, and SMPIT Abu Bakar Yogyakarta. The first trial involves 688 students and the second trial involves 696 students. Content validity is obtained through expert judgment. The construct validity is determined by Lisrel's second order CFA. Reliability coefficients include Omega coefficients (ω) and Alpha coefficients from Cronbach. Based on the results of this research, the scale to measure of student's honesty characters consists of 15 items that theoretically and empirically proved to be of good quality. The scale has good content validity supported by V Aiken index of 0.88-0.92. The scale has good construct validity. Reliability of the scale is also good supported by both the Omega coefficient of 0.86.

First Page

143

Last Page

153

Issue

2

Volume

22

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v22i2.19310

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Asmani, J. M. (2011). Buku panduan internalisasi pendidikan karakter di sekolah. DIVA Press.

Azwar, S. (2005). Penyusunan skala psikologi(1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bashir, H., & Bala, R. (2018). Development and validation of academic dishonesty scale (ADS): presenting a multidimensional scale. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1125a

Bisri. (2009). Akhlak. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Agama RI.

Cherrington, J. O., & Cherrington, D. J. (1979). Honesty and business ethics in the accounting profession. In the Annual Meetings of the American Accounting Association in Honolulu. Hawaii.

Emosda. (2011). Penanaman nilai-nilai kejujuran dalam menyiapkan karakter bangsa. Innovatio, X(1), 151–166.

Ercegovac, Z., & Richardson, J. V. (2004). Academic dishonesty, plagiarism included, in the digital age: A literature review. College & Research Libraries, 301–318.

Garson, G. D. (2009). Overview structural equation modeling.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Hooper, D., Couglan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptable factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 279–299.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2013). Modul pelatihan implementasi kurikulum 2013: Materi pelatihan guru implementasi kurikulum 2013 SMP/MTs.Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Panduan penilaian untuk sekolah menengah pertama. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama.

Koellhoffer, T. (2009). Character education: being fair and honest. New York: Infobase Publishing.

Koss, J. (2011). Academic dishonesty among adolescents. American Psychological Association, 11(2), 38–46.

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II: affective domain. New York: David McKay.

Kumaidi. (2014). Implementasi penilaian autentik dalam pembelajaran di kelas. In Seminar Nasional Implementasi Penilaian dan Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Leachy, G. (2012). QR code in mathematics classrooms. In Mathematics Teaching Issue(Vol. 235, pp. 27–29). Derby: The Association of Teacher of Mathematics.

Lickona, T. (1992). Educating for character. New York: Bantam Books.

Maharani, E. (2016, June). DIY targetkan 25 persen sekolah terapkan K-13,. Republika.Co.Id.

Popham, W. J. (2009). Test better, teach better: the instructional role of assessment. United States of America: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2017). Responseoptions for scales: does it matter what words you use? Journal of Media Critiques, 3(9), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.17349/jmc117103

Schmelkin, L. P., Gilbert, K., Spencer, K. J., Pincus, H. S.,& Silva, R. (2008). A multidimensional scaling of college students’ perceptions of Academic Dishonesty. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0021

Suranto, Muhyadi, & Mardapi, D. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi Uji Kompetensi Keahlian (UKK) administrasi perkantoran di SMK. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 98–114. Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep/article/view/2127

Widhiarso, W. (2009). Koefisien reliabilitas pada pengukuran kepribadian yang bersifat multidimensi. Psikobuana, 1(1), 39–48.

Wijanto, S. H. (2008). Structural equation modeling dengan Lisrel 8.8. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Yamin, S., & Kurniawan, H. (2009). Structural equation modeling: belajar lebih mudah teknik analisis data kuesioner dengan Lisrel-PLS. Jakarta: Salemba Infotek.

Download

Share

COinS