•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Keywords

accreditation models; accreditation instruments; accreditation procedures

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan memperoleh model akreditasi SMA/MA yang efektif, efisien, dan akuntabel. Produk model yang dikembangkan adalah instrumen akreditasi dan prosedur akreditasi. Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian pengembangan. Pengembangan model dilakukan melalui kegiatan focus group disscussion (FGD). Validasi instrumen dilakukan oleh pakar, sedangkan validasi prosedur dilakukan oleh peserta FGD. Validitas isi instrumen ditentukan dengan cara menghitung indeks koefisien V Aiken, sedangkan estimasi reliabilitas instrumen ditentukan dengan teknik intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) menggunakan SPSS. Validasi prosedur dilakukan dengan cara menghitung rerata skor hasil penilaian peserta FGD. Uji coba dilakukan untuk mengetahui keefektifan model yang dikembangkan. Subjek coba adalah praktisi terdiri dari kepala sekolah, guru, dan tenaga administrasi. Keefektifan model ditentukan dengan cara menghitung rerata skor hasil penilaian praktisi. Model akreditasi yang dikembangkan diberi nama Model Akreditasi SMART. Kesimpulan tentang Model Akreditasi SMART: (1) memiliki karakteristik sebagai model akreditasi SMA/MA yang efektif, efisien, dan akuntabel; (2) instrumen yang digunakan memiliki validitas dalam kategori sangat baik dan reliabilitas dalam kategori baik; (3) prosedur akreditasi seperti dipaparkan di atas mendapat penilaian baik dari peserta FGD; dan (4) keefektifan model termasuk kategori baik dan dapat digunakan.

Kata kunci: model akreditasi, instrumen akreditasi, prosedur akreditasi

DEVELOPING AN ACCREDITATION MODEL OF SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL (SMA/MA)

Abstract

This study is aimed at obtaining an effective, efficient and accountable accreditation model for Senior Secondary School/Madrasah Aliyah (SMA/MA). The product of the model developed is an accreditation instrument and procedure. This study is a research and development (R & D). The model developing was conducted through focus group discussion (FGD). Instrument validation was done by experts, while the procedure validation was performed by the FGD participants. The content validity of the instrument was determined by calculating the V Aiken coefficient index, while the instrument reliability estimation was determined by using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) using SPSS. Procedure validation was done by calculating the mean score of the FGD participants' assessment results. Trial was conducted to find out the effectiveness of the developed model. The subject of the trial was practitioners comprising of principals, teachers, and administrative personnels. The effectiveness of the model was determined by calculating the average score of the practitioners' assessment. The accreditation model developed was named SMART Accreditation Model. The conclusion on the SMART Accreditation Model are as follows: (1) having the characteristics of an effective, efficient, and accountable accreditation model for SMA/MA; (2) the content validity and reliability of the instrument used are in a very good category; (3) the afore-mentioned accreditation procedure is considered to be good by the FGD participants; and (4) the effectiveness of the model is in a good category and it can be used. Keywords: accreditation model, accreditation instrument, accreditation procedure

First Page

105

Last Page

117

Issue

1

Volume

22

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v22i1.9860

References

Artcraft. (2005). Program evaluation. Sydney: Artcraft Research.

Aswandi. (2009). Akreditasi sekolah 2009. Retrieved December 25, 2010, from http://www.pontianak/post.com/ ?mib =berita.detail&id=27077

Bennett, W. . (2000). Independen school accreditation: A guide to school choice. Retrieved December 22, 2008, from Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.). New York: Longman Publishing.

COA. (2008). Accreditation handbook: definition of stipulations 2007-08. Retrieved July 19, 2008, from https://www.ctc.ca.gov/docs/default-source/educator-prep/coa-agendas/2008-05/2008-05-item-16.pdf?sfvrsn=ba0760a2_0

Depdiknas. (2002). Manajemen peningkatan mutu berbasis sekolah: konsep dasar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

ECA. (2005). Accreditation in the European higher education area. Retrieved July 19, 2008, from http://www.aic.lv/bolona/Bologna/contrib/Statem_oth/ECA_on_Bergen.pdf

Griffin, P., & Nix, P. (1991). Educational assessment and reporting. Sydney: Harcont Brace Javanovic Publisher.

Havelock, R. G. (1976). Planning for innovation through dissemination and utilization of knowledge. Michigan: Institute for Social Research The University of Michigan.

Huitt, W. (2004). Assessment, measurement, and evaluation. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/measeval/measeval.html

Kartowagiran, B. (2006). Prinsip-prinsip dasar monitoring dan implementasinya. Bahan Penyelenggaraan Calon Tim Pelatih Monitoring dan Evaluasi Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Lindsay, D. H., & Campbell, A. (2002). An examination of AACSB acccreditation status an accounting program quality indikator. Retrieved October 22, 2008, from http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/ research/ TemporarilyDisabled---wdsi/2002/ pdffiles/papers/012.pdf.htm

Mardapi, D. (2003). Konstruksi tes dan analisis butir (Makalah tidak dipublikasikan). Yogyakarta.

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.

Menteri Pendidikan Nasional. Peraturan pemerintah republik indonesia nomor 19 tahun 2005 tentang standar nasional pendidikan (2005).

Menteri Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Pedoman pelaksanaan akreditasi sekolah/madrasah. Jakarta: Badan Akreditasi Sekolah/Madrasah.

Menteri Pendidikan Nasional. Peraturan Mendiknas Nomor 63 Tahun 2009 tentang Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan (2009).

Pagliarulo, M. A. (1996). Accreditation: Its nature, process, and effective implementation. Physical Therapy Education Journal, 66(7), 1114-1118.

Patil, A. S., & Pudlowski, Z. J. (2005). Important issues of the accreditation and quality assurance and a strategy in the development of an accreditation framework for engineering courses. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 9(1), 49-58.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional, Pub. L. No. 20 (2003). Indonesia.

Stark, J. S., & Thomas, A. (1994). Assessment and program evaluation. Needham Heights: Simon and Schuster Custom Publishing.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation, theory, models, and applications. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Sumarno. (2000). Pengembangan model akreditasi sekolah negeri tingkat SLTP dan SMU. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sutadji, E. (2009). Model evaluasi mutu sekolah: pengembangan instrumen untuk menetapkan mutu. Disertasi tidak dipublikasikan. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Thorndike, R. M., Cunningham, G. K., Thorndike, R. L., & Hagen, E. P. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.

Worthen, B. R., & Sander, J. R. (1989). Educational evaluation: theory and practice. Worthington, Ohio: Charles A. Jones Publishing Company.

Download

Share

COinS