•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Keywords

asesmen alternatif, pendekatan realistik

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan dan menemukan asesmen alternatif yang valid, praktis dan efektif berlandaskan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan realistik di Sekolah Dasar (SD). Penelitian ini merupakan peneli-tian pengembangan yang mengacu pada model pengembangan pendidikan dari Plomp dengan mengacu pada kriteria kualitas produk pengembangan yang dikemukakan Nieveen, yang melipu-ti kriteria kevalidan, kepraktisan, dan keefektifan. Hasil peneliti-an ini adalah seperangkat penilaian dalam pembelajaran mate-matika dengan pendekatan realistik. Hasil uji coba, menunjuk-kan bahwa asesmen alternatif telah memenuhi kriteria kevalid-an, kepraktisan, dan keefektifan. Kevalidan asesmen alternatif beserta perangkat asesmen yang digunakan termasuk dalam kategori sangat baik. Kepraktisan dan keefektifan asesmen alter-natif beserta seluruh perangkat asesmen yang digunakan dalam pelaksanaan asesmen di dalam kelas termasuk kategori sangat praktis dan efektif. Ketercapaian keefektifan asesmen alternatif berdasarkan proses dan hasil pembelajaran cenderung mening-kat dengan kategori baik. Demikian juga respons siswa dan guru terhadap penerapan asesmen alternatif yang cenderung positif.

Kata kunci: asesmen alternatif, pendekatan realistik

________________________________________________

DEVELOPING ALTERNATIVE ASSESMENT IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING USING THE REALISTIC APPROACH IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Abstract This study aimed to develop and generate a valid, practical and effective alternative assessment based on the principle of mathematics learning using the realistic approach in elementary schools (Sekolah Dasar, SD). This study was a research and development study which referred to the model of educational development by Plomp based on the criteria of product quality proposed by Nieveen, including the criteria of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. This study produced a set of assessment in mathematics learning using realistic approach. Based on the result of the tryout, the generated alternative assessment has fulfilled the criteria of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. The validity of alternative assessment and its assessment sets are in very good category. The result of the testing shows that the alternative assessment is very practical and effective, in terms of the learning process and learning achievement which tend to improve toward the good category. The response of students and teachers towards the implementation of this alternative assessment is also positive.

Keywords: alternative assessment, realistic approach

First Page

250

Last Page

268

Issue

2

Volume

15

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v15i2.1096

References

Allen, M. J. & Yen, W.M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research (4th ed.). New York: Longman.

Cohen, B. H. (2001). Explaining psychological statistics (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Cohen, R. J. & Swerdlik, M.E. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to test and measurement (6th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

De Lange, J. (1987). Mathematics, insight and meaning. Utrecht: OW&OC, Utrecht University.

Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Freudenthal, H. (1981). Major problems of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 133-150.

Grinnell, R.M. Jr. (1988). Social work research and evaluation (3rd ed.). Itasca: F.E.Peacock.

Hadi, Sutarto. (2005). Pendidikan matematika realistik dan implementasinya. Banjarmasin: Tulip.

Hatfield, M. M, Edwards, N.T., Bitter, G.G., et al. (2003). Mathematics methods for elementary and middle school teachers. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P.R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Mardapi, Djemari. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendia Press.

Marpaung, Y. (2006). Karakteristik PMRI (Pendidikan matematika Realistik Indonesia). Mathedu Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Vol.1 No.1 Januari 2006: Surabaya: Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika PPs. UNESA.

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Educational assessment of students. Columbus, NJ: Merril.

Pearson Educational Development Group. (2003). Authentic assessment overview. Diambil pada tanggal 15 Maret 2007, dari http://www.pearsonatschool.com

Plomp, T. (1997). Development research on/in educational development, Enschede: Twente University.

Plomp, T. (2001). Development research on/in educational development, Enschede: Twente University.

Ratini, Rumgayatri, & Siti Mustaqimah. (November 2001). Pengalaman dalam melaksanakan uji coba pembelajaran matematika secara realistik di MIN Yogyakarta II. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia, di Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Reys, R. E., Suydam, M. N., Lindquist, M. M., et al. (1998). Helping children learn mathematics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.

Ter Heege, H. (1978). Testing the maturity for learning the algorithm of multiplications. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 9, 75-83.

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1996). Assessment and realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute

Wilkerson, J. R. & Lang, W. J. (2007). Assessing teacher competency: Five standards-based steps to valid measurement using the CAATS Model. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Download

Share

COinS