•  
  •  
 

Keywords

blended learning, face-to-face learning, motivation, learning achievement

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan motivasi dan prestasi belajar siswa dalam mata pelajaran KKPI antara siswa yang menggunakan model face-to-face learning dan siswa yang menggunakan model blended learning, peningkatan motivasi dan prestasi belajar siswa dalam mata pelajaran KKPI akibat penerapan model blended learning, dan interaksi pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran dan motivasi terhadap prestasi belajar KKPI siswa SMKN 1 Paringin. Penelitian kuasi eksperimen ini menggunakan dua kelompok, yaitu kelompok eksperimen yang menggunakan model blended learning dan kelompok kontrol yang menggunakan model face-to-face learning. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI SMKN 1 Paringin. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 57 siswa terbagi atas 30 siswa kelompok kontrol dan 27 siswa kelompok eksperimen. Pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner dan tes soal pilihan ganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara motivasi dan prestasi belajar siswa yang menggunakan model blended learning dan siswa yang menggunakan model face-to-face learning, ada peningkatan motivasi dan prestasi belajar siswa yang signifikan akibat penerapan model blended learning, dan tidak terdapat interaksi pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran dan motivasi terhadap prestasi belajar siswa.

THE INFLUENCE OF BLENDED LEARNING MODEL ON MOTIVATION AND ACHIEVEMENT OF VOCATIONAL SCHOOL STUDENT

Abstract

The objective of the study is to reveal the differences of the learning motivation and achievement of the students using face-to-face learning model compared to those using blended learning model, the improvement of students' learning motivation and achievement due to the use of blended learning model, and the interaction of the effect of learning model and motivation on students' learning achievement in KKPI lesson. This quasi-experimental study used two groups: the experimental group who were taught using blended learning and control group who were taught using face-to-face learning. The population was 11th grade students of SMKN 1 Paringin. A sample of 57 students was divided into 2 groups, with 30 students as the control group and 27 students as the experimental group. The techniques for collecting the data were a test method by giving a written test and non-testing method by distributing a questionnaire. The results of study show that there is significant difference between the learning motivation and achievement of the students using face-to-face learning compared to those using blended learning model, there is a significant increase in learning motivation and achievement due to the use of blended learning model, and there is no interaction of the effect of learning model and motivation on students' learning achievement in KKPI lesson.

Page Range

234-249

Issue

2

Volume

2

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jpv.v2i2.1034

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv/article/view/1034

References

Allen, I. E., Seamen, J., & Garret, R. (2007). Blending In: The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States. USA: The Sloan Consortium.

Carman, J. M. (2005). Blended Learning Design: Five Key Ingredients. Retrieved March 20, 2011, from http://www.agilantlearning.com/pdf/Blended%20Learning%20Design.pdf

Castle, S. R., & McGuire, C. J. (2010). An Analysis of Student Self-Assessment of Online, Blended, and Face-to-Face Learning Environments: Implications for Sustainable Education Delivery. Journal of International Education Studies, 3(3), 36.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction. 2nd Ed. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Daryanto. (2009). Panduan Proses Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Inovatif. Jakarta: AV Publisher.

Didin Mukodim, Ritandiyono, & Harumi Ratna Sita. (2004). Peranan Kesepian dan Kecenderungan Internet Addiction Disorder Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Universitas Gunadarma. Proceedings Komputer dan Sistem Intelijen, Jakarta, 1411-6286. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from http://research.mercubuana.ac.id/proceeding/Didin_111-120.pdf

Halonen, J. S., & Santrock, J. W. (1999). Psychology: Contexts & Application. Boston: McGraw-Hill College.

Hergenhahn, B. R., & Olson, M. H. (2008). Theories of Learning. (Terjemahan Tri Wibowo). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

Herminarto Sofyan & Hamzah B. Uno. (2004). Teori Motivasi dan Aplikasinya dalam Penelitian. Gorontalo: Nurul Jannah.

Hill, W. F. (2010). Theories of Learning. (Terjemahan M. Khozim). Bandung: Nusa Media.

Jex, S. M. (2002). Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Johnson, R. L., Penny, J. A., & Gordon, B. (2009). Assessing Performance: Designing, Scoring, and Validating Performance Tasks. New York: The Guilford Press.

Jusoff, K., & Khodabandelou, R. (2009). Preliminary Study on the Role of Social Presence in Blended Learning Environment in Higher Education. Journal of International Education Studies, 2(4), 82.

Munir. (2009). Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh: Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Naidu, Som. (2006). E-Learning: A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices. New Delhi: Aishi Creative Workshop.

Plummer, Lisa. (2012, March 8). Credit Recovery Programs Combine the Best of Online and In-Class Instruction. Retrieved March 27, 2012, from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2012/03/08/Online-credit-recovery.aspx?p=1

Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1492-3831. Retrieved August 25, 2011, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewFile/192/795

Sardiman, A. M. (1994). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Slavin, R. E. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan: Teori dan Praktik. (Terjemahan Marianto Samosir). Jakarta: Indeks.

Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (2008). Psychology. 9th edition. Boston: Pearson Education.

Woolfolk, Anita. (2004). Educational Psychology. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Download

Share

COinS