Keywords
Classroom action research, learning practices, running maintenance, teaching learning
Document Type
Article
Abstract
The study was aimed at investigating the advantages of the habituation of running maintenance and supervision over the practice learning process and the learning achievement of the students of Mechanical Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. It was participatory classroom action research. The subjects were 80 third-semester students grouped into the group C class. The data on the habituation of running maintenance were collected using a questionnaire; those on the students' learning achievement were collected through documentation and analyzed using a descriptive technique; those on the supervision intensity and machine feasibility were gathered through observations and analyzed using the descriptive qualitative technique. The findings showed that: 1.) The implementation of running maintenance used the systems of coaching, mentoring, and supervision with an optimal intensity of lecturers in teaching-learning machining practices; 2.) The habituation of running maintenance was done through standard procedures, and the implemented action took three cycles; 3.) The achievement of the habituation of running maintenance on students during the implementation of teaching-learning practices was characterized by the rapid job sheet completion that must be taken in one semester; and 4.) With the habituation of running maintenance, the feasibility of the existing machines in the workshop could be maintained.
Page Range
222-231
Issue
3
Volume
11
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jpv.v11i3.44018
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv/article/view/44018
Recommended Citation
Sukardi, T., Setiadi, B. R., & Yudantoko, A. (2021). The benefit of running maintenance habituation before learning of machining process begins. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 11(3), 222-231. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v11i3.44018
References
Asiabaka, I. P. (2008). The need for effective facility management in schools in Nigeria. New York Science Journal, 1(2), 10-21. http://www.sciencepub.net/newyork/0102/02_0366_Asiabaka_FACILITIES.pdf
Dhillon, B. S. (2002). Engineering maintenance: a modern approach. CRC Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=vfHKBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Engineering+maintenance:+A+Modern+approach&ots=6uwiqy4iYj&sig=_hYDJOHuWX2BFqFKE-Y7xGcJhz8
Ekpoh, U. I. (2018). School plant maintenance culture and utilization. In N. P. Ololube (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Planning and Policy Analysis (pp. 138-155). Pearl Publishers. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Uduak-Ekpoh-2/publication/332803962_School_Plant_Maintenance_Culture_and_Utilization/links/5ccae6ea92851c8d22146cb2/School-Plant-Maintenance-Culture-and-Utilization.pdf
Firdaus, N., Samat, H. A., & Mohamad, N. (2019). Maintenance for energy efficiency: a review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 530(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/530/1/012047
Gackowiec, P. (2019). General overview of maintenance strategies-concepts and approaches. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering, 2(1), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.2478/mape-2019-0013
Gandhare, B. S., & Akarte, M. (2012). Maintenance strategy selection. Ninth AIMS International Conference on Management, January, 1330-1336. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Balasaheb-Gandhare/publication/267298504_Maintenance_Strategy_Selection/links/571ee43708aeaced7889e9ec/Maintenance-Strategy-Selection.pdf
Garg, H. P., & Gupta, B. P. (1987). Industrial maintenance. S. Chand Limited. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Industrial_Maintenance/Hh9gPQAACAAJ?hl=en
Goyal, R. K., & Maheshwari, K. (2012). Maintenance management practices: a retrospective and literature review. International Journal of Advances in Engineering Research, 3(2), 49-66. https://ijaer.com/admin/upload/06 Feb_2012_Ravi Kumar Goyal.pdf
Hantoro, S., & Sukardi, T. (1990). Teknologi pemeliharaan mesin perkakas (1st ed.). Liberty. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=20018
Hardt, F., Kotyrba, M., Volna, E., & Jarusek, R. (2021). Innovative approach to preventive maintenance of production equipment based on a modified TPM methodology for industry 4.0. Applied Sciences, 11(15), 6953. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156953
Pophaley, M., & Vyas, R. K. (2010). Plant maintenance management practices in automobile industries: a retrospective and literature review. International Journal of Advances in Engineering Research, 3(3), 512-541. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.v3n3.p512-541
Prokopenko, J., & North, K. (1996). Productivity and quality management: a modular programme. International Labour Office. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=dw%5C_CtAEACAAJ
Shanmugam, A., & Robert, T. P. (2015). Human factors engineering in aircraft maintenance: a review. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 21(4), 478-505. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-05-2013-0030
Sheikhalishahi, M., Pintelon, L., & Azadeh, A. (2016). Human factors in maintenance: a review. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 22(3), 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-12-2015-0064
Subiyono. (1993). Manajemen Perawatan. Polman.
Sukardi, T., Marwanto, A., & Ngadiyono, Y. (2013). Pengembangan model running maintenance pada proses pemesinan di Jurusan Mesin SMK Rumpun Teknologi se-DIY. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/22708/1/LAPORAN AKHIR BURNING , THOMAS.pdf
