Classroom action research, learning practices, running maintenance, teaching learning

Document Type



The study was aimed at investigating the advantages of the habituation of running maintenance and supervision over the practice learning process and the learning achievement of the students of Mechanical Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. It was participatory classroom action research. The subjects were 80 third-semester students grouped into the group C class. The data on the habituation of running maintenance were collected using a questionnaire; those on the students' learning achievement were collected through documentation and analyzed using a descriptive technique; those on the supervision intensity and machine feasibility were gathered through observations and analyzed using the descriptive qualitative technique. The findings showed that: 1.) The implementation of running maintenance used the systems of coaching, mentoring, and supervision with an optimal intensity of lecturers in teaching-learning machining practices; 2.) The habituation of running maintenance was done through standard procedures, and the implemented action took three cycles; 3.) The achievement of the habituation of running maintenance on students during the implementation of teaching-learning practices was characterized by the rapid job sheet completion that must be taken in one semester; and 4.) With the habituation of running maintenance, the feasibility of the existing machines in the workshop could be maintained.

Page Range






Digital Object Identifier (DOI)





Asiabaka, I. P. (2008). The need for effective facility management in schools in Nigeria. New York Science Journal, 1(2), 10-21. http://www.sciencepub.net/newyork/0102/02_0366_Asiabaka_FACILITIES.pdf

Dhillon, B. S. (2002). Engineering maintenance: a modern approach. CRC Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=vfHKBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Engineering+maintenance:+A+Modern+approach&ots=6uwiqy4iYj&sig=_hYDJOHuWX2BFqFKE-Y7xGcJhz8

Ekpoh, U. I. (2018). School plant maintenance culture and utilization. In N. P. Ololube (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Planning and Policy Analysis (pp. 138-155). Pearl Publishers. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Uduak-Ekpoh-2/publication/332803962_School_Plant_Maintenance_Culture_and_Utilization/links/5ccae6ea92851c8d22146cb2/School-Plant-Maintenance-Culture-and-Utilization.pdf

Firdaus, N., Samat, H. A., & Mohamad, N. (2019). Maintenance for energy efficiency: a review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 530(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/530/1/012047

Gackowiec, P. (2019). General overview of maintenance strategies-concepts and approaches. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering, 2(1), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.2478/mape-2019-0013

Gandhare, B. S., & Akarte, M. (2012). Maintenance strategy selection. Ninth AIMS International Conference on Management, January, 1330-1336. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Balasaheb-Gandhare/publication/267298504_Maintenance_Strategy_Selection/links/571ee43708aeaced7889e9ec/Maintenance-Strategy-Selection.pdf

Garg, H. P., & Gupta, B. P. (1987). Industrial maintenance. S. Chand Limited. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Industrial_Maintenance/Hh9gPQAACAAJ?hl=en

Goyal, R. K., & Maheshwari, K. (2012). Maintenance management practices: a retrospective and literature review. International Journal of Advances in Engineering Research, 3(2), 49-66. https://ijaer.com/admin/upload/06 Feb_2012_Ravi Kumar Goyal.pdf

Hantoro, S., & Sukardi, T. (1990). Teknologi pemeliharaan mesin perkakas (1st ed.). Liberty. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=20018

Hardt, F., Kotyrba, M., Volna, E., & Jarusek, R. (2021). Innovative approach to preventive maintenance of production equipment based on a modified TPM methodology for industry 4.0. Applied Sciences, 11(15), 6953. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156953

Pophaley, M., & Vyas, R. K. (2010). Plant maintenance management practices in automobile industries: a retrospective and literature review. International Journal of Advances in Engineering Research, 3(3), 512-541. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.v3n3.p512-541

Prokopenko, J., & North, K. (1996). Productivity and quality management: a modular programme. International Labour Office. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=dw%5C_CtAEACAAJ

Shanmugam, A., & Robert, T. P. (2015). Human factors engineering in aircraft maintenance: a review. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 21(4), 478-505. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-05-2013-0030

Sheikhalishahi, M., Pintelon, L., & Azadeh, A. (2016). Human factors in maintenance: a review. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 22(3), 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-12-2015-0064

Subiyono. (1993). Manajemen Perawatan. Polman.

Sukardi, T., Marwanto, A., & Ngadiyono, Y. (2013). Pengembangan model running maintenance pada proses pemesinan di Jurusan Mesin SMK Rumpun Teknologi se-DIY. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/22708/1/LAPORAN AKHIR BURNING , THOMAS.pdf