industrial product-based learning, experiences learning, mechanical engineering skills

Document Type



Revitalization of vocational education must be designed and developed according to the industry's needs through appropriate learning innovations. The selection of suitable learning methods influences the graduate competencies and learning experiences of students. This study aims to analyze the learning process based on industrial products in mechanical practices. The learning process analysis includes giving apperceptions and motivation, mastering learning materials, learning strategies implementation, learning resources or media, involving students, and closing the learning process. The research used an experimental method with a static group comparison design. This study used two groups consisting of the experimental and control group with 20 respondents for each. The experimental group is respondents who used industrial products-based learning, and the control group is respondents who used conventional learning (job sheet-based). The research respondents were students of the Mechanical Engineering Department Universitas Negeri Semarang who have passed the Mechanical Process I lesson chosen by random sampling technique. Research data were collected using a teaching and learning process questionnaire, while the data analysis technique used is the Mann Whitney U Test and descriptive statistics. The research findings show that there are differences in the process of the mechanical practice using industrial products-based learning and conventional learning (job sheet-based). Implementation of learning with the gift of apperception and motivation, mastery of learning materials, application of learning strategies, assembling of learning resources or learning media, students' participation in the learning process, and closing the learning process is better to use the industrial products-based learning compared to conventional learning.

Page Range






Digital Object Identifier (DOI)





Asfani, K., Suswanto, H., & Wibawa, A. P. (2016). Influential factors of students' competence. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education (WTE&TE), 14(3), 416-420. http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/WTE&TE/Pages/TOC_V14N3.html

Baena, F., Guarin, A., Mora, J., Sauza, J., & Retat, S. (2017). Learning factory: The path to industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 73-80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.022

Balve, P., & Albert, M. (2015). Project-based learning in production engineering at the Heilbronn learning factory. Procedia CIRP, 32, 104-108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.215

Biwer, F., oude Egbrink, M. G. A., Aalten, P., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2020). Fostering effective learning strategies in higher education - A mixed methods study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 186-203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.03.004

Bizimana B., Ampofo, S. Y., Ndayambaje, I., Njihia, S. M., Somuah, B. A., & Guantai, K. K. (2020). Influence of students' learning experiences on involvement in almamater in selected Ghanaian, Kenyan and Rwandan Universities. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100026. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100026

Daniel, L. F., José, M. E., Jacobo, R., Jeff, P., & Victoria, L. (2019). Motivational impact of active learning methods in aerospace engineering Students. Acta Astronautica, 165, 344-354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.026

Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P., Ott, K., & Sihn, W. (2016). Tangible industry 4.0: A scenario-based approach to learning for the future of production. Procedia CIRP, 54, 13-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.162

Febriana, R. (2017). Efektivitas model pembelajaran berbasis kompetensi dengan pendekatan dunia kerja pada program D3 tata boga. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(1), 148-155. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i1.8891

Finch, C. R., & Crunkilton, J. R. (1979). Curriculum development in vocational and technical education: Planning, content, and implementation. Allyn and Bacon.

Gregoriou, M. (2019). Creative thinking features and museum interactivity: Examining the narrative and possibility thinking features in primary classrooms using learning resources associated with museum visits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 32, 51-65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.03.003

Hadgraft, R. G. (2017). New curricula for engineering education: Experiences, engagement, e-resources. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 19(2), 112-117. Retrieved from http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/GJEE/Publish/TOCVol19No2.html

Joshi, A., Desai, P., & Tewari, P. (2019). Learning analytics frame work for measuring students' performance and teachers' involvement through problem based learning in engineering education. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 954-959. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.138

Kuhn, K. L., & Rundle-Thiele, S. R. (2009). Curriculum alignment: Exploring student perception of learning achievement measures. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 351-361.

Lasauskiene, J., & Rauduvaite, A. (2015). Project-based learning at university: Teaching experiences of lecturers. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 788-792. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.182

Leung, A. S. M., & McGrath, S. (2010). An effective model to support people development: The emerging approach of the Hong Kong Institute for Vocational Education. International Education Studies, 3(4), 94-106. Retrieved from https://bibliography.lib.eduhk.hk/en/bibs/1b72cb65

Martinez Jr., R. L. (2007). An evolving set of values-based principles for career and technical education. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 23(1), 74-75. doi:https://doi.org/10.21061/jcte.v23i1.444

Mills, J. E. (2003). Engineering education - Is problem based or project based learning the answer?. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. Retrieved from http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2003/mills_treagust03.pdf

Mitchell, A., Petter, S., & Harris. A. L. (2017). Learning by doing: Twenty successful active learning exercise for information systems courses. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 16, 21-46. doi:https://doi.org/10.28945/3643

Müller-Frommeyer, L. C., Aymans, S. C., Bargmann, C., Kauffeld, S., & Herrmann, C. (2017). Introducing competency models as a tool for holistic competency development in learning factories: Challenges, example and future application. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 307-314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.015

Park, C. (2003). Engaging students in the learning process. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(2), 183-199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826032000107496

Prosser, C. A., & Quigley, T. H. (1959). Vocational education in a democracy. American Technical Society.

Rentzos L., Doukas M., Mavrikios, D., Mourtzis D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2014). Integrating manufacturing education with Industrial practice using teaching factory paradigm: A construction equipment application. Procedia CIRP, 17, 189-194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.126

Suswanto, H., Hamdan, A., Mariana, R. R., Dardiri, A., Wibawa, A. P., Nafalski, A., & Vianiryzki, A. F. (2017). The effectiveness of project-based learning and STAD learning on improving web programming competency. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(4), 368-373. Retrieved from http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/WTE&TE/Pages/TOC_V15N4.html

Uziak, J. (2016). A project-based learning approach in an engineering curriculum. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 18(2), 119-123. Retrieved from http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/GJEE/Publish/TOCVol18No2.html

Wagner, T. (2008). The seven survival skills for careers, college, and citizenship. Advisors Corner. Retrieved from https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/about/strategicplan/advisorscorner.pdf

Wu, T., & Wu, Y. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631

Yudiono, H. (2017). The alignment of productive competence on machinery between vocational education institutions and industry. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(3), 256-259. Retrieved from http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/WTE&TE/Pages/TOC_V15N3.html