Document Type
Article
Abstract
This research aims at developing an instrument for measuring views on Muhammadiyah ideology that is valid and reliable. This study adapted Borg and Gall's development model through initial research, planning, initial product development, limited testing, product revision, expanded testing, and product revision. The steps started with initial research to obtain the ideology construct of books related to Muhammadiyah. The ideology construct obtained was used as the basis to arrange instrument items which were then validated by five experts in the fields of measurement, Muhammadiyah ideology, practitioners, and Muhammadiyah cadres by filling the sheet of variable appropriateness with indicators and indicators appropriateness with the statements. The results of the experts' validation were analyzed with the Aiken formula. The validated instrument was then tested limitedly in the Muhammadiyah regional leadership in Karanganyar, Sragen, and Boyolali, by involving 253 respondents. The result of the test was analyzed using factor analysis and SEM using the Lisrel program. The result of the research shows that the instrument for measuring the views on Muhammadiyah ideology consists of 26 items comprised of seven aspects of Muhammadiyah ideology measurement, including tauhid (two items), living in a social group (three items), Allah's law (three items), Islamic doctrine (five items), the prophet's ittiba' (four items), organization (three items), and Muhammadiyah goals (six items). The instrument fulfills the validity criteria since it has a loading factor between 0.3-0.85(>0.3) and CR 0.92 (>0.7). The instrument is reliable since Cronbach's Alpha is 0.869>0.7. Since it is valid and reliable, then it is suitable to be used to measure the views on Muhammadiyah ideology in Indonesia.
First Page
120
Last Page
132
Issue
1
Volume
27
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/pep.v27i1.62333
Recommended Citation
Subando, Joko; Samsuri, Muh; and Muslimin, Edy
(2023)
"Developing an instrument for measuring views on Muhammadiyah ideology,"
Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Vol. 27:
Iss.
1, Article 10.
DOI: 10.21831/pep.v27i1.62333
Available at:
https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/jpep/vol27/iss1/10
References
Abas, S. (2018). Konsep dan icon gerakan Muhammadiyah. Ejournal KAWASA, 8(3), 10-21. https://bit.ly/3X3wLyD
Ahmad, M., Rosyidi, M., & Damanhuri, A. (2018). Pemetaan cabang dan ranting Muhammadiyah DKI Jakarta tahun 2018. In K. Umam, Siska and A. Fatimah (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Kolokium 2018 (pp. 214-237). Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA. https://doi.org/10.22236/psd/11214-23874
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448545101
Aiken, L. R. (2000). Psychological testing and assessment. Allyn & Bacon.
Amnie, E., Rosidin, U., Herlina, K., & Abdurrahman, A. (2021). Developing assessments in improving students' digital literacy skills. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(1), 1-15. https://10.21831/pep.v25i1.33600
Azwar, S. (1997). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.
Azwar, S. (2015). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Central Board of Muhammadiyah. (2005). Anggaran dasar dan anggaran rumah tangga Muhammadiyah. Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah.
Daulay, M. Y., & Amini, N. R. (2022). Evaluasi model pengajian-pengajian Muhammadiyah dan 'Aisyiyah. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(01). http://dx.doi.org/10.30868/ei.v11i01.1577
Duani, A. H. (2021). Pembelajaran kemuhammadiyahan: Evaluasi program di Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA (Uhamka). Instruksional, 2(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.24853/instruksional.2.2.103-111
Fuady, A. S. (2020). Internalisasi ideologi Muhammadiyah mahasiswa program beasiswa guru Madin STIT Muhammadiyah Bojonegoro. Tadarus, 9(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.30651/td.v9i2.4727
Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural equation modeling: Metode alternatif dengan Partial Least Square (PLS). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ghozali, I., & Fuad. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Teori, konsep, dan aplikasi dengan program Lisrel 8.80. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hadi, A., Romli, R., Ismail, F., & Karoma, K. (2022). Evaluasi model Kirkpatrick pelatihan baitul arqam dalam pembinaan kompetensi kepribadian guru SMA Muhammadiyah di kota palembang. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(02). https://doi/10.30868/ei.v11i02.3687
Hidayat, M. C. (2019). Benturan ideologi Muhammadiyah; pertarungan ideologi moderat versus radikal. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 15(2), 328-333. https://doi.org/10.18196/AIIJIS.2019.0108.328-333
Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. CRC press.
Indriyani, D., & Hidayat, S. (2015). Pembinaan ideologi Muhammadiyah di sekolah/madrasah (studi kasus di Majelis Dikdasmen Pimpinan Cabang Muhammadiyah Selogiri Tahun 2014) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Junaidi, M., & Jannah, R. (2018). Revitalisasi ideologi Muhammadiyah dalam penguatan kader persyarikatan. Tajdida: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Gerakan Muhammadiyah, 16(2), 103-116. https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/tajdida/article/view/7621/4355
Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Dicke, T., Parker, P. D., & Craven, R. G. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and set-ESEM: optimal balance between goodness of fit and parsimony. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(1), 102-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503
Mas'ud, H. H. (2018). Pengaruh pemahaman ideologi Muhammadiyah terhadap kinerja guru SD Muhammadiyah di wilayah pimpinan cabang Muhammadiyah Blimbing Malang [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Muhammadiyah Malang.
Munir, A. (2010). Pokok-pokok pikiran Muhammadiyah: Panduan intelektual santri dalam memahami ideologi, visi, misi dan cita-cita gerakan Muhammadiyah. Pondok Al-Amin.
Munir, M., Jafar, U., & Barsihannor, B. (2020). Muhammadiyah: Contesting ideologies between progressive Islam and traditional. JICSA (Journal of Islamic Civilization in Southeast Asia), 9(2), 145-171. https://doi.org/10.24252/jicsa.v9i2.18653
Naimi, N., & Amini, N. R. (2021). Strengthening Muhammadiyah ideology through webinar Aisyiyah, north Sumatra, faces covid 19 new normal. In H. R. Setiawan, R. Harfiani, N. Ginting & R. Pradesah (Eds.), Proceeding International Seminar Of Islamic Studies (pp 700-706). Faculty of Islamic Religion, Universitas of Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara. https://bit.ly/460hIti
Nashir, H. (2014). Memahami ideologi Muhammadiyah. Suara Muhammadiyah.
Nurhayati, S., Idris, M., & Burga, M. A.-Q. (2019). Muhammadiyah dalam perspektif sejarah, organisasi, dan sistem nilai. TrustMedia Publishing.
Rusijono, R., Jaedun, A., Kartowagiran, B., Ahman, A., Laliyo, L. A., & Mam, S. (2020). Developing the teacher's social competency assessment instrument in the fourth industrial revolution era. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(2), 125-135. https://10.21831/pep.v24i2.29482
Rusydi, R. (2016). Peran Muhammadiyah (Konsep pendidikan, usaha-usaha di bidang pendidikan, dan tokoh). Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 1(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.26618/jtw.v1i2.367
Sabon, Y. O. S., Istiyono, E., & Widihastuti, W. (2022). Developing "Pancasila Student Profile" instrument for self-assessment. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(1), 37-46. https://10.21831/pep.v26i1.45144
Shrotryia, V. K., & Dhanda, U. (2019). Content validity of assessment instrument for employee engagement. Sage Open, 9(1), 26-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018821751
Stalikas, A., Kyriazos, T. A., Yotsidi, V., & Prassa, K. (2018). Using bifactor EFA, bifactor CFA, and exploratory structural equation modeling to validate the factor structure of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire, Greek Version. Psychology, 9(03), 348-371. http://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.93022
Subando, J., Kartowagiran, B., & Munadi, S. (2020). The development of an instrument for evaluating the process of strengthening religious ideology. In M. Salimi & D. A. Nugraha (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education, September 2020 (pp.1-8). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3452207
Subando, J., Kartowagiran, B., & Munadi, S. (2021). Development of curriculum design evaluation instruments in strengthening Al-irsyad ideology in Indonesia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1426-1435. https://doi/ 10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21758
Subando, J., Samsuri, M., & Muslimin, E. (2023). Konstruk ideologi Muhammadiyah: Fondasi pengembangan instrumen pengukuran kekuatan ideologi Muhammadiyah. Pawarta: Journal of Communication and Da'wah, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.54090/pawarta.143
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
Tanthowi, P. U. (2019). Muhammadiyah dan politik: Landasan ideologi bagi artikulasi konstruktif. Maarif Journal, 14(2), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.47651/mrf.v14i2.65
Wiharto, W. (2011). Tafsir Muqaddimah anggaran dasar dan kepribadian Muhammadiyah [Paper presented at the Baitul Arqam Khusus AUM Kesehatan Propinsi Jawa Tengah, Semarang]. https://bit.ly/3J82jh4
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Resource, 11(2), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6