•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This study was to determine the correlation between translation, interpretation, and extrapolation abilities on the learning achievement of elementary school students in science subjects. The research method was descriptive quantitative. Data collection techniques used tests to understand the concepts of translation, interpretation, and extrapolation with test techniques and students' learning achievement with secondary data. Product moment and regression test were used in data analysis. The research results show that (1) there is a correlation between translation ability and the level of science learning achievement of grade V students; the significance level is satisfactory. (2) There is a correlation between the interpretation ability and the level of science learning achievement of grade V students; the significance level is satisfactory. (3) There is a correlation between extrapolation ability and the level of science learning achievement of grade V students; the significance level is very satisfactory. (4) There is a correlation between the ability of translation, interpretation, and extrapolation on the science learning achievement of grade V students; the level of significance is very satisfactory.

First Page

198

Last Page

207

Issue

2

Volume

24

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v24i2.35730

References

Arifin, Z. (1990). Evaluasi instruksional prinsip-praktek-prosedur. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arends, R. I. (2001). Learning to teach (5th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. McGraw Hill.

Seymour, B. J. (1966). Study psicology cognitif. Harvard University.

Buchori, M. (1982). Evaluasi dalam pendidikan. Rineka Cipta.

Crowl, T. K., Kaminsky, S., & Podell, D. M. (1997). Educational psychology: Windows on teaching. McGraw Hill.

Darmojo, H., & Kaligis, J. R. F. (1992). Pendidikan IPA II. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Direktorat Jenderal Penddiikan Tinggi Proyek Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Haryanto, H. (1999). Ilmu pengetahuan alam: Jilid 3. Erlangga.

Hurlock, E. B. (1990). Psikologi perkembangan. Erlangga.

Laksana, D. N. L. (2016). Miskonsepsi dalam materi IPA sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(2), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i2.8588

Muakhirin, B. (2014). Peningkatan hasil belajar IPA melalui pendekatan pembelajaran inkuiri pada siswa SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Guru Caraka Olah Pikir Edukatif, 0(1), 51-57.

Purwanto, N. (1997). Psikologi perkembangan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sudjarwo, S. (1984). Teknologi pendidikan. Gelora Aksara Pratama.

Arikunto, S. (2001). Prosedur penelitian pendekatan praktek. Rineka Cipta.

Carin, A. A., & Bass, J. E. (2001). Teaching science as inquiry. Prentice Hall.

Suryani, E., Rusilowati, A., & Wardono, W. (2016). Analisis pemahaman konsep IPA siswa SD menggunakan two-tier test melalui pembelajaran konflik kognitif. Journal of Primary Education, 5(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v5i1.12893

Susilo, L. (2015). Peningkatan hasil belajar pendidikan kewarganegaraan dengan menggunakan metode bermain peran di sekolah dasar kabupaten tanah tidung. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPD.061.03

Syahputra, M. A. D., & Mahdiana, N. (2019). Analysis of history textbooks based on benedict anderson's approach. Historika, 22(2), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.20961/historika.v22i2.37962

Winkel, W. S. (1991). Psikologi belajar. Rajawali.

Yusuf, M., & Sunarti, B. (1980). Panduan komunikasi informasi dan edukasi. Lab. PLB FKIP UNS.

Share

COinS