Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Document Type



The study aims to evaluate the entrepreneurship education program through extracurricular activities of Student Company at a school using a modified CIPP and Kirkpatrick evaluation model. The research found that (1) the context of the program has been very good to provide facilities to the students who want to develop their entrepreneurial potential at school. The vision, mission, and objectives of the entrepreneurship education program at the vocational high school are able to describe the future expectations for students, especially in the field of entrepreneurship. (2) The supporting program implementation factors are in the "high" category and able to support program implementation following the objectives. (3) The implementation of entrepreneurship education program through Student Company extracurricular activities is in the "middle" category, seen from some discrepancies found between the program plans and implementation. (4) The satisfaction level of students taking part in entrepreneurial education program activities is in the "middle" category, seen from their several complaints about the activities of Student Company that are not following the program plans. (5) The level of knowledge of students taking part in the Student Company extracurricular activities is in the "high" category. (6) The application of entrepreneurial values in the daily activities of students taking part in the Student Company extracurricular activities is in the "middle" category. (7) The level of self-efficacy of students towards entrepreneurship is in the "low" category. The program of entrepreneurship education through extracurricular activities of Student Company is not fully able to increase students' interest in entrepreneurship.

First Page


Last Page






Digital Object Identifier (DOI)



Ahmad, A. (2018). Evaluasi program mahasiswa wirausaha dengan model cipo di Universitas Brawijaya dan Universitas Negeri Malang. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 154-167. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.16577

Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Badu, S. Q. (2012). Implementasi evaluasi model Kirkpatrick pada perkuliahan masalah nilai awal dan syarat batas. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16, 102-129. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i0.1108

Baskin, C. (2001). Using Kirkpatrick's four-level-evaluation model to explore the effectiveness of collaborative online group work. James Cook University.

Central Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Agustus 2017: Tingkat pengangguran terbuka (TPT) sebesar 5,50 persen. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2017/11/06/1377/agustus-2017--tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka--tpt--sebesar-5-50-persen.html

Channay, A. (2016). Impact of entrepreneurship education. Kauffman Center.

Co, J., & Cooper, S. (2014). Developing entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intent: A case of social entrepreneurship. In Social entrepreneurship (pp. 179-193). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01396-1_8

Dworaczyk, W. J. (1998). Use of Stufflebeam's CIPP model to assess a change effort in a division of a university library. Doctoral dissertation. University of North Texas.

Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas"Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: A new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(9), 701-720. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590610715022

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2009). Transferring learning to behavior: Using the four levels to improve performance. Berrett-Koehler.

Lackéus, M. (2015). Entrepreneurship in education: What, why, when, how. Chalmers School of Entrepreneurship (Local Economic and Employment Development) Division of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 62 of 2014 on Extracurricular Activities on Primary and Secondary Education Levels, (2014).

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 81A of 2013 on Curriculum Implementation, (2013).

Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (2002). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (Daniel L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (eds.); Vol. 49). Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6

Vemmy, C. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi intensi berwirausaha siswa SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 2(1), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v2i1.1022

Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Pustaka Pelajar.

Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00179.x

Wirawan, W. (2012). Evaluasi teori model standar aplikasi dan profesi: Contoh aplikasi evaluasi program, pengembangan sumber daya manusia, Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) mandiri perdesaan, kurikulum, perpustakaan, dan buku teks. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Yogawati, N. D., & Widihastuti, W. (2019). Evaluating the implementation of English communication therapy (ECT): An objective structured clinical assessment (OSCA) approach. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i1.22449

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-83.