PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN ASESMEN DIRI DAN TEMAN SEJAWAT KOMPETENSI BIDANG STUDI PADA MAHASISWA

Authors

Enny Wijayanti, Universitas Palangka Raya, Indonesia
Mundilarto Mundilarto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keywords

asesmen diri; asesmen teman sejawat; kompetensi fisika; Peer-assessment; Self-assessment; Physics competency

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk: (1) mengembangkan konstruk instrumen asesmen diri (ADM) dan asesmen teman sejawat (ATS) sebagai pelengkap asesmen formatif, (2) mengetahui karakteristik ADM dan ATS, (3) mengetahui efektivitas ADM & ATS, dan (4) mengetahui kebermanfaatan ADM & ATS yang digunakan sebagai pelengkap asesmen formatif. Prosedur pengembangan meliputi dua tahap, yaitu pengembangan dan validasi, mengacu pada model pengembangan Cennamo dan Kalk dengan lima fase pengembangan, yaitu define, design, demonstrate, develop dan deliver. Content validity dibuktikan melalui expert judgment dianalisis dengan coefficient Aiken dan focus group discussion dan teknik Delphi. Validitas konstruk dibuktikan dengan program SmartPLS. Subjek penelitian adalah mahasiswa semester enam Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Palangka Raya. Hasil penelitian adalah sebagai berikut: (1) instrumen ADM dan ATS mengukur konstruk yang sama pada kompetensi fisika, hasil uji kecocokan model nilai GFI sebesar 0,994, dan SRMR sebesar 0,062 menunjukkan model fit yang baik, (2) karakteristik instrumen mencakup validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran dan daya pembeda termasuk kategori baik, (3) ADM dan ATS terbukti cukup efektif dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar, (4) ADM dan ATS sangat bermanfaat sebagai umpan balik terhadap proses, kemajuan dan perbaikan hasil belajar.

Kata kunci: asesmen diri dan asesmen teman sejawat, kompetensi fisika

DEVELOPING SELF-ASSESSMENT AND PEER-ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENTS' SUBJECT-MATTER COMPETENCY

Abstract

This study aimed to: (1) develop the construct of the Students' Self-Assessment (SSA) and Students' Peer-Assessment (SPA) as supplementary formative assessment on physics teaching and learning, (2) find out the chracteristic of the SSA and SPA, (3) find out the effectivenes and (4) find out the usefulness of the SSA and SPA. The development procedure consisted of two stages: development and validation, based of the spiral model from Cennamo and Kalk, with five phases, namely define, design, demonstrate, develop, and deliver. Content validity was determined by expert judgment through coefficient validity analysis from Aiken, focus group discussion, and Delphi technique. Construct validity was analyzed using software SmartPLS. The subjects of this study were sixth semester students majoring on Physics Education at Palangka Raya University. The result of the study can be concluded as follows: (1) the result of model fit, the GFI values 0.996 and the SRMR values of 0.062, may be taken to indicate good fit, (2) the characteristic of the SSA and SPA consisted of validity, reliability, difficulty index and discriminant index had been verified, (3) the effectiveness of group SSA and SPA is better than group of non SSA and SPA, besides students' response declares SSA and SPA are reasonably effective, (4) SSA and SPA are very useful as feedback for the learning process, progress, and the learning outcome improvement. Keywords: Peer-and Self-assessment, Physics competency

First Page

129

Last Page

144

Issue

2

Volume

19

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v19i2.5572

Recommended Citation

Wijayanti, Enny and Mundilarto, Mundilarto (2015) "PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN ASESMEN DIRI DAN TEMAN SEJAWAT KOMPETENSI BIDANG STUDI PADA MAHASISWA," Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Vol. 19: Iss. 2, Article 1.
DOI: 10.21831/pep.v19i2.5572
Available at: https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/jpep/vol19/iss2/1

References

AIken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142.

Amien, M. (1987). Mengajarkan ilmu pengetahuan alam (IPA) dengan menggunakan metode “discovery dan inquiry”. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti.

Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, R. (Ed). (2001). A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). New York: Longman.

Arends, R.I. (2007). Learning to teach II (7thed.). New York: McGraw Hill Companies.

Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for Learning: Beyond the black box. University of Cambridge School of Education. Diakses tanggal 30 Mei 2010 dari http://www.assessment-reformgroup.org.uk.

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan. 80, 2, 139-148. Diambil 30 Juni 2011 dari http;//www.academicleadership.org/articles/9/1_full.html.

Black, P. et al. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan. 86, 1, 8-14.

Cennamo, K. & Kalk, D. (2005). Real world instructional design. Australia: Thomson Learning.

Croker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Intoduction to classical and modern test theory. New York, NY: CBS College Publishing.

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-undang Republic Indonesia Nomor 20 pasal 58 ayat (1) Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Ebel, R.L. & Frisbie, D.A. (1986). Essential of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Ghazali.I., & Latan, H. (2012). Partial least squares konsep, teknik dan aplikasi smartPLS 2.0M3. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip.

Gronlund, N.E. & Linn, R.L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. (6thed.). New York: Publishing Company.

Hair, J.F. Hult, G.T. Ringle, C.H. & Sarstedt, H. (2014). A primer on partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS –SEM). Los Angeles: Sage Publication, Inc.

Haris, L. (2007). Employing formative assessment in the classroom. Diakses tanggal 28 September 2010 dari http://imp.sagepub.com/content/10/3/249.refs.html.

Hayat, B. (2010). Prinsip-prinsip dan strategi penilaian kelas. Jakarta: Puspendik.

Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. (2002). Meaningful assessment: A manageable and cooperate process. Boston: Allyn Bacon.

Keaten, J.A. et al. (1993). A field investigation of peer-assessment as part of the student group grading process. EDRS ED 361 753.

Kumaidi, (2001a). Pengujian sebagai bagian peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran. Pidato pengukuhan guru besar madya dalam ilmu evaluasi pada Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Padang.

Kusairi, S. (2011). Analisis asesmen formatif fisika SMA berbantuan computer. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Linn, Robert L. (1989). Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, penilaian & evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching. (10th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (1989). Designing tests that are integrated with instruction. In Linn, R. (Ed.), Educational assessment of students (5th ed.), p. 447. Columbus, Ohio: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Noonan, B., & Duncan, C.R. (2005). Peer and self-assessment in high school. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 4, 17, 1-10.

Tatsuoka, K. K. (2009). Cognitive assessment. New York: Routledge.

Trowbridge, L. W., & Bybee, R. W. (1986). Becoming a secondary school science teacher (4th ed). Columbus: Charles E Merril Publishing Company.