PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI CIPP PADA PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN TAHFIZ AL-QUR'AN DI PONDOK PESANTREN

Authors

Muyasaroh Muyasaroh, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Al-Qur€„¢an Al-Ittifaqiah
Sutrisno Sutrisno, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Keywords

development, evaluation, tahfiz Al-Qur’an

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Studi ini bertujuan untuk: (1) menghasilkan model pengembangan evaluasi program pembelajar'an tahfiẓ al-Quran diberi nama Coni P2, (2) menghasilkan teknik pelaksanaan evaluasi program pembelajaran tahfiẓ al-Qur'an, dan (3) menghasilkan struktur komponen dan indikator model evaluasi. Studi ini merupakan penelitian dan pengembangan (R&D) dengan menggunakan sembilan langkah dari 10 langkah model Borg dan Gall. Jumlah subjek uji coba pertama 33 orang, uji coba kedua 49 orang, dan uji coba ketiga 224 orang. Komponen model evaluasi yang digunakan adalah model evaluasi Stufflebeam (CIPP). Langkah-langkah evaluasi yang digunakan adalah langkah Malcolm Provus. Teknik pengumpul data yang digunakan adalah Delphi, FGD, kuesioner, observasi, wawancara, dan studi dokumentasi. Validitas konstruk dianalisis menggunakan CFA dan Reliabilitas menggunakan Cronbach Alpha. Hasil penelitian: (1) model evaluasi program Coni P2 dikembangkan dengan cara kajian teori, temuan di lapangan, Delphi, FGD, uji coba sebanyak tiga kali; (2) evaluasi di tiga pondok pesantren: Al-Ittifaqiah, Raudhatul Ulum, dan Raudhatul Qur'an ditemukan kesenjangan sarana belajar, kinerja guru, dan motivasi belajar santri; (3) komponen konstruk model evaluasi Coni P2 terdiri atas konteks, input, proses, dan produk, yang terbagi menjadi 13 indikator. Hasil analisis CFA: (1) Chi Square (χ²) = kecil; (2) ρ-value > 0,05; (3) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) < 0,08; dan (4) Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) < 0,90.

Kata kunci: pengembangan, evaluasi, tahfiẓ al-Qur'an

______________________________________________________________

DEVELOPING CIPP EVALUATION INSTRUMENT FOR TAHFIZ AL-QUR'AN IN PONDOK PESANTREN

Abstract The study aimed to: (1) generate an evaluation development model of tahfiz Al-Qur'an learning program entitled Coni P2; (2) generate a technique of tahfiz Al-Qur'an learning program evaluation implementation; and (3) generate component structures and an indicators of evaluation model. The study was a research and development (R&D) type by implementing 9 of 10 steps in Borg and Gall's model. The subject for the first trial the 33 people, for the second trial were 49 people, and for the third trial were 224 people. The implemented component of evaluation model was Stufflebeam Evaluation Model (CIPP). The evaluation steps that the researchers implemented were the ones taken from Malcolm Provus. The data gathering techniques that the researchers implemented were Delphi, FGD, questionnaires, observation, interview and study of documentation. The construct validity was analyzed by implementing CFA and the construct reliability was analyzed by implementing Cronbach Alpha. The results of the research were as follows: (1) the model of Coni P2 evaluation program was developed by implementing theoretical review, field findings, Delphi, FGD and three-time experiments; (2) from the evaluations performed in three pondok pesantren, namely Al-Ittifaqiah, Raudhatul Ulum and Raudhatul Qur'an, the researchers found discrepancy in learning facilities, teacher performance and santri's learning motivation; and (3) the construct components of Coni P2 evaluation model consisted of context, input, process and product that were divided into 13 indicators. The results of CFA analysis were as follows: (1) (1) Chi Square (χ²) = kecil; (2) ρ-value > 0.05; (3) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) < 0.08; dan (4) Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) < 0.90.

Keywords: development, evaluation, tahfiz Al-Qur'an

First Page

215

Last Page

233

Issue

2

Volume

18

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v18i2.2862

Recommended Citation

Muyasaroh, Muyasaroh and Sutrisno, Sutrisno (2014) "PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI CIPP PADA PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN TAHFIZ AL-QUR'AN DI PONDOK PESANTREN," Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Vol. 18: Iss. 2, Article 5.
DOI: 10.21831/pep.v18i2.2862
Available at: https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/jpep/vol18/iss2/5

References

Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran.

Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research: An intruduction. New York & London: Longman. Book Company.

Cozby, P.C. (2009). Methods behavioral research (9th ed). New York: McGrawHill Com- panies, Ins, 1221.

Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design (Quali- tative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches) (3rd ed). Los Angeles: Sage Publication.

Cruickshank, D.R. (1990). Research that in- form teacher and teacher educators. Bloo- mington: Phi Delta Kappa Educa- tional Foundation.

Darussalam, G. (2010). Program evaluation in higher education program evaluati- on in higher education. The Inter- national Journal of Research and Review, 5, 56-65.

Davidson, E.J. (2005). Evaluation methodology basics (The nuts and bolts of sound evalu- ation). London: ECIY 1 SP United Kingdom.

Eye, A. V. & Mun, E. Y. (2005). Analyzing rater agreement (Manifest variable methods). Marwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., & Borg,W.R (2007)

Educational research an intruduction (8th ed). Library of Congress Cataloging-in Publication Data. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Harto, K. & Abdurrahmansyah. (2011). Metodologi pembelajaran berbasis active learning (Arah baru pembelajaran PAI di sekolah dan madrasah). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Felicha.

Issac, Stephen & Michel, William B. (1981). Handbook in research & evaluation. (2nd ed). San Diego, California: Edits Publisher.

Joyce, B. Weil, M Colhoun, E. (2009). Model of teaching (8th ed). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc Publishing US Allyn & Bocam, One Lake Street Upper Saddle River.

Keeves, J.P. & Lakomski, G. (1992). Isues in educational research. Amsterdam: Perga- mon An Imprint of Elveer Science.

Nurosis, J.M (1986). SPSS/PC + for the imbbc/xt/at. Chicago, SPSS.Inc

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran penilaian & evaluasi pendidikan.Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Merten, D.M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology (Integrating diversi with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods)(3th ed). California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1985). Qualitative data analysis. California: Sage Publication, Inc. 275 South Baverly Drive, Baverly Hills.

Stufflebeam, D. L, Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evalaution. U.S.A. Massachu- setts: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Sudijono, A. (2003). Pengantar evaluasi pendi- dikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan (Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wijanto, S.H. (2008). Struktural equation modeling dengan lisrel. 8. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Winkel, W.S. (2009). Psikology pengajaran.

Yogyakarta: Media Abadi.

Worthen, B.R & Sanders, J.R. (1981). Educa- tional Evaluation: Theory and practice. Ohio: Charles A. Jones Publishing Company Worthington.

Zaid, M. A. (2011) (King Khalid Univer- sity). Language acquisition, linguistic creativity and achievement: Insights from the Qur'an. KEMANUSIAAN Vol. 18, No. 2, 75-100.