•  
  •  
 

Keywords

prejudice and stereotype, ethno-religio segregated schools (E-RS), multicultural education ramah model

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan pola dan mengukur intensitas hubungan antar-kelompok siswa etnis Melayu, Dayak, Tionghoa, dan Madura di empat sekolah swasta berbasis etno-religi (ethno-religio segregation/E-RS) di Kota Pontianak: SMA Sultan Syarif Abdurrahman (Melayu-Islam), SMA Yayasan Pendidikan Kristen (YPK)[Dayak-Nasrani], SMA Kristen Immanuel (Tionghoa-Nasrani, Konghucu, Budha), dan Madrasah Aliyah Swasta (MAS) Al-Anwar (Madura-Islam), berdasarkan sikap dan perilaku berprasangka (prejudice) dan stereotip terhadap etnis dan agama. Metode campuran kualitatif-kuantitatif digunakan pada tahap penelitian. Pada tahap pengembangan rumusan model pendidikan multikultural diuji melalui diskusi kelompok terbatas (Focus Group Discussion/FGD). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sekolah E-RS menampilkan pola-pola hubungan antarkelompok etnis-agama yang khas, seperti ethno-sentrisme, cinta-benci (approach-avoidance) dan benci-cinta (avoidance-approach), saling membenci (avoidance-avoidance) atau berseteru (conflicting pair), dan saling menyukai/ men-dukung (approach-approach) atau sebagai pasangan bulan madu (honeymoon). Kelompok etnis Madura cenderung dijadikan sebagai kelompok target konflik, sementara Tionghoa sebagai kelompok etnis sanjungan. Model pendidikan multikultural ramah dianggap sesuai diterapkan dalam program pendidikan di sekolah E-RS untuk membangun citra positif pada masing-masing kelompok agar prasangka (prejudice) dan bias anggapan (stereotip) dapat dikendorkan.

Kata kunci: prasangka (prejudice) dan stereotip, ethno-religio segregation (E-RS), model pendidikan multikultural ramah

_____________________________________________________________

MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION RAMAH MODEL FOR ETHNO-RELIGIO SEGREGATED SCHOOLS (E-RS) KOTA PONTIANAK

Abstract This research is intended to formulate patterns and measure the strength of the interethnical-religious relation among students from four different ethnic groups of Malay, Dayak, Chinese, and Madurese at the ethno-religio segregated schools (E-RS) in Pontianak: Sultan Syarif Abdurrahman Senior High School (Malay-Islam), Christian Education Foundation Senior High School/ YPK (Dayak-Christian], Immanuel Christian Senior High School (Chinese-Christian, Konghucu/Confucius, Buddha), dan Private Islamic Senior High School/MAS Al-Anwar (Madurese-Islam), based on their prejudice and stereotype attitudes toward ethnic and religion. The research applied qulititative-quantitative mixed method, and for developing the model, focus group discussion (FGD) was used. The findings show that E-RS have unique and critical interethnic-religious relation patterns, i.e. ethno-centrism, approach-avoidance, avoidance-approach, avoidance-avoidance (conflicting pair), and approach-approach (honeymoon). Madurese is treated as potential conflicting targeted group; Chinese as popular referring group among case groups. A model of Ramah (friendly attitudes and behaviours) in multicultural education is promoted to develop positive images among the groups to reduce potential prejudice and stereotypes.

Keywords: prejudice and stereotype, ethno-religio segregated schools (E-RS), multicultural education ramah model

First Page

202

Last Page

214

Issue

2

Volume

18

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v18i2.2861

References

Baso, A. (2003). Demokrasi dan multi- kulturalisme. Diakses tanggal 25 Janu- ari 2009, dari http://www.wahana kebangsaan.org/index.php?option= com_content&task=view&id=51&Ite mid=33

Banks, J.A. (2003). Educating global citizens in a diverse world. New Horizon for Learning. Diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2009, dari http://www.newhorizons. org/strategies/multicultural/banks2.h tm.

Banks, J.A. (2001). Diversity within unity: Essential principles for teaching and learning in a multicultural society. New Horizons for Learning. Diambil pada tanggal 2 Februari 2009, dari http://www.newhorizons.org/strateg ies/multicultural/banks2.htm

Banks, J.A. (1997). Educating citizens in a multicultural society. New York: Teacher College Press.

Castro, L.N. & Galace, J.N. (2010). Peace education: a pathway to a culture of peace. Philippines: Centre for Peace Edu- cation

Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research design: Qua- litative and quantitative approaches. Cali- fornia: SAGE Publications.

Djajadi, I. (2004). Kekerasan etnik dan per- damaian etnik: Dinamika relasi sosial di antara Dayak, Melayu, Cina & Madura di Kalimantan Barat. Diambil pada tang- gal 3 Oktober 2005, dari http:// www.communalconflict.com/iqbal.do c

Fullan, M. (Ed.) (1997). The challenge of school change: A collection of articles. Illinois: SkyLight Training and Publishing, Inc.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1981). Effec- tive evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approach. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Gollnick, D.M., & Chinn, P.C. (2006). Mul- ticultural education in a pluralistic Society. 7th edition. New Jersey: Pearson Edu- cation, Inc.

Hammond, L.D. (Ed.) (1993). Review of research in education. New York: Ameri- can Educational Research Associa- tion.

Jamal, M., & Pähler, Klaus. (Eds.) (2002). Communal conflicts in contemporary Indo- nesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa dan Buda- ya IAIN Jakarta & The Konrad Ade- nauer Foundation.

Kaufman, R., & Thomas, S. (1980). Evalua- tion without fear. New York: New Viewpoints.

Kivimäki, T. (Ed.) (2002). Democracy, decen- tralization, identity and conflict in Indo- nesia. Helsinki & Copenhagen: CTS- Conflict Transformation Service.

Nursalim, M., et al. (Eds.) (2002). Damai selalu untuk Indonesia: Dialog budaya antarsuku di Kalimantan Timur. Yogya- karta: Komunitas Ombak.

Malti (2011). Holistic understanding of peace education. Scholar’s Voice, 2 (1),

-177.

McMillan, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual intr- oduction. 5th edition. New York: Addi- son Wesley Longman, Inc.

Semiawan, C. (2003). Memelihara integrasi sosial dan menegakkan HAM melalui pendidikan multikultural. Diakses tang- gal 25 Januari 2009, dari http://www. wahanakebangsaan.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4 2&Itemid=33

Stark, J.S., & Thomas, A. (1994). Assessment and program evaluation. Massachusett: Simon & Schuster Custom Publishing.

Swetnam, L. A. (2003). Lessons on multi- cultural education from Australia and the United States [1]. The Caring House. Artikel 581243701. Diambil pada tanggal 11 September 2005, dari http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb

Trijono, L., et al. (Eds) (2004). Potret retak nusantara: Studi kasus konflik di Indo- nesia. Yogyakarta: CSPS Books.

Walker, A., & Dimmock, C. (2005). Leading the multiethnic school: Research evi- dence on successful practice. The Educational Forum. Artikel 858856741. Di- akses tanggal 10 September 2005 dari http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb

Wessells, M. (1994). Peace education: a psycho- logical perspective. Diakses pada tanggal

Desember 2013, dari http:// www.psysr.org/about/committees/p eace_education/overview.php

Worthen, B.R., & Sander, J.R. (1981). Edu- cational evaluations: Theory and practice. Ohio: Charles A. Jones Publishing Company.

Yaqin, M.A. (2005). Pendidikan multikultural: ‘Cross-cultural understanding’ untuk demo- krasi dan keadilan. Yogyakarta: Pilar Media.

Download

Share

COinS