Keywords
model development, evaluation, school culture
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk 1) mengindentifikasi, 2) me-ngembangkan model evaluasi, dan 3) mengetahui kelayakan model evaluasi kultur SMA yang dikembangkan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dan pengembangan. Langkah-langkah penelitian dan pe-ngembangan menggunakan acuan pokok dari Plomp, sedangkan penentuan jumlah subjek uji coba menggunakan acuan dari Borg & Gall. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) keadaan kultur akademik yang berkembang di SMA saat ini terdiri atas enam aspek budaya, yaitu berprestasi dan berkompetisi, disiplin dan efisien, jujur dan terbuka, gemar membaca, teguran dan penghargaan, serta kerja sama dan kebersamaan; 2) keadaan kultur sosial yang ber-kembang di SMA saat ini terdiri atas sembilan aspek budaya, yaitu jujur dan terbuka, teguran dan penghargaan, kerjasama dan keber-samaan, saling menghormati, bersih, disiplin dan efisien, ber-sahabat/komunikatif, saling percaya, dan semangat kebangsaan; 3) hasil confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) menunjukkan bahwa model evaluasi kultur akademik dengan responden siswa dan guru sesuai dengan data lapangan dan model evaluasi kultur SMA yang di-kembangkan layak digunakan.
Kata kunci: pengembangan model, evaluasi, kultur sekolah
______________________________________________________________
DEVELOPING A MODEL OF AN EVALUATION OF THE SCHOOL CULTURE IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Abstract This study aims to: 1) identify the condition of the school culture in senior high schools (SHSs) at this moment; 2) develop a model of an evaluation of the school culture in SHSs; and 3) know the feasability of the developed model of the evaluation of the school culture in SHSs. This research was a research and development. This steps of the research and development were those proposed by Plomp, while the number of the try out subjects was established using Borg & Gall. The conclusions of the study are as follows 1) the condition of academic culture which is developing in SHSs consists of six cultural aspects, namely achievement and competition, discipline and efficiency, honesty and openness, reading habit, reward and punishment, and cooperation and togetherness; 2) the condition of social culture which is developing in SHSs consists of nine cultural aspects, namely honesty and openness, reward and punishment, cooperation and togetherness, mutual respect, cleanness, discipline and efficiency, friendliness/communicativeness, mutual trust, and nationalism spirit; 3) the result of the CFA shows that the evaluation model for the academic culture for the students is relevant to the field. Teacher respondance shows that value of KMO is 0,655; 4) the result of the social culture for students is relevant to the field. Teacher respondance shows that value of KMO is 0,682; 5) the effectiveness of the model of the evaluation of the school culture is judged as a good evaluation model.
Keywords: model development, evaluation, school culture
First Page
88
Last Page
107
Issue
1
Volume
17
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/pep.v17i1.1363
Recommended Citation
Siswanto, Siswanto
(2013)
"PENGEMBANGAN MODEL EVALUASI KULTUR SMA,"
Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Vol. 17:
Iss.
1, Article 6.
DOI: 10.21831/pep.v17i1.1363
Available at:
https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/jpep/vol17/iss1/6
References
Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. New York, NY: Longman.
Depdiknas. (2004). Pedoman pengembangan kultur sekolah. Jakarta: Ditjen Dikdasmen Depdiknas.
Gaziel, Haim H. (20 Juni 2005). Impact of school, culture on effectiveness of secondary schools with disadvantaged students. Diambil pada tanggal 7 Agustus 2008, dari http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=8330505 &sid=Fmt=4&lientld=68516&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Ghozali, Imam & Fuad. (2005). Structural equation modelling: Teori, konsep dan aplikasi dengan program Lisrel 8,54. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Mardapi, Djemari. (2007). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogya- karta: Mitra Cendikia Offset.
Nurosis, J.M. (1986). SPSS/PC+for the imbbc/xt/at. Chicago: SPSS.Inc. Plomp, T. (1997). Development research on/in educational development. Ens-
chende: University of Twente.
Savage, T.V. & Armstrong, D.G. (1996). Effective teaching in elementary social studies.Third edition. Englewood Cliffs: Merril, Prentice Hall.
Schein, Edgar, H .(1992). Organizational culture and leadership. Second edition.
San Fransisco, CA: Jossey Bass A Willey Co.
Solimun. (2002). Structural equation modeling (SEM) lisrel dan amos. Malang: Fakultas MIPA. Universitas Brawijaya.
Stolp, Stephen. (17 September 1995). Leadership for school culture.ERIC Digest Artikel. Diambil pada tanggal 24 Juli 2008, dari http:
/www.ericdigest /1995–1/culture.html.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation, the article presented at the 2003 annual conference of the Oregon program evaluators network (OPEN) 3 Oktober 2003.Diambil pada tanggal 25 Oktober 2005, dari http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/cippmodel.
Sudiyono, Anas. (2003).Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Gra- findo Persada.
Wagner, C.R. & Pellan. (2002). Center for improving school culture (cisc). Diambil pada tanggal 1 Mei 2003, dari http://www.schoolculture.net/ triangle. html.