Keywords
transformasi, madrasah, pendidikan Islam, tipologi model
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Undang-undang No.2 Tahun 1989 tentang Sistem Pen-didikan Nasional mengamanatkan madrasah ditransformasi dari lembaga pendidikan agama menjadi sekolah yang berciri agama Islam. Pada status yang baru madrasah harus bekerja keras memenuhi tuntutan stakeholders. Penelitian tentang transformasi Madrasah Aliyah (MA) ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian adalah ada enam masalah yang diidentifikasi yaitu (1) kapasitas manajemen, (2) kurikulum, (3) keterbatasan SDM, (4) orientasi akademik, (5) ujian nasional, (6) otonomi daerah. Secara kelembagaan, MA ada tiga tipe, yaitu MA Plus, MA Salf Tafaqqubfiddin, dan MA dengan pembelajaran ke-agamaan lebih banyak. Ada tiga model yang diaplikasikan yaitu institusional sebagai model utama, model sain terintegrasi, dan model manajemen terpadu. Penerapan model tersebut perlu memperhatikan kesesuaian karakter, konteks, dan setting MA.
Kata kunci: transformasi, madrasah, pendidikan Islam, tipologi model
______________________________________________________________
TRANSFORMATION OF MADRASAH IN NATIONAL EDUCATION SYSTEM
Abstract According to 1989 Education System Act No. 2, and 1990 Government Regulation No. 28, Madrassas as edu-cational institutions have transform from educational religion to "Schools Characterized by the Islamic teachings". With this new status, the madrassas entered into a new phase of struggle, from their legal status into meeting the needs and the expectations of their stakeholders. In case of implementation of its transformation, the result of this qualitative - phenol-menology approach, there were identified six problems of MA: (1) management capacity, (2) curriculum, (3) limited human resources, (4) academic orientation and science dichotomy (5) national examination, and (6) local government autonomy. Institutionally there are three major types of MA: (1) MA plus, (2) MA Salaf - Tafaqquh fiddin, (3) MA enriched with religious teachings. Based on the problems identified and the types of MA put into consideration, three models are offered as the results of social action study, i.e. (1) institutional model - streaming model, (2) integrated science model, and (3) integrated management model. The result of this study is methodologically idiographic, and the compatibility of these models depend upon the appropriateness of the characters, context and setting of an MA.
Keywords: transformation, madrasah, Islamic education, tipology, model
First Page
155
Last Page
186
Issue
1
Volume
15
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/pep.v15i1.1092
Recommended Citation
Supaat, Supaat
(2011)
"TRANSFORMASI MADRASAH DALAM SISTEM PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL,"
Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Vol. 15:
Iss.
1, Article 8.
DOI: 10.21831/pep.v15i1.1092
Available at:
https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/jpep/vol15/iss1/8
References
Arsohah, H.(1999). Sejarah pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Logos. Brown, E.D. (1989). Organisational culture. London: Prentice Hall.
Considene, M. (1996). Public policy: A critical approach. South Melbourne: McMillan Educatio Australia Pty Ltd.
Davis, N.K., Warhurst, J.W.J., & Waller, P. (1993). Public policy in Australia (2nd ed.). NSW Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Dye, T.R. (1981). Understanding public policy (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs – New Jersy: Prentice Hall.
Easton, D. (1953). The political system. New York: Knopf.
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. England: Cassell Educational Limited.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. California: Sage Publications Inc.
Hasbullah. (2001). Sejarah pendidikan Islam di Indonesia: Lintasan sejarah pertumbuhan dan perkembangan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hendropuspito. (1988). Sosiologi agama. Jakarta: Kanisius.
Hopkins, D. (2006). Every school a great school: Realizing the potential of system leadership. New York: Mc Graw Hill –Open University Press.
Imron, Ali. (1996). Kebijakan pendidikan di Indonesia: Proses produk dan masa depannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Kahiti, P.K. (1974). History of Arab. London: MacMillan Press Ltd.
Langgulung, H. (1997). Manusia dan pendidikan: Suatu analisis psikologi dan pendidikan. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Husna.
MacKinnon, F. (1960). The politics of education: A study of political administration of the public schools. Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Maksum. (1999). Madrasah: Sejarah dan perkembangannya. Jakarta: Logos. Maqdisi, G. (1981). The rising of college: Institution of learning in Islam and the West. Endinburgh: Endinburgh University Press.
Mastuhu (1994). Dinamika sistem pendidikan pesantren: Suatu kajian tentang unsur dan nilai sistem pendidikan pesantren. Jakarta: INIS.
Mastuhu (1999). Memberdayakan sistem pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Logos.
Mastuhu (1994). Dinamika sistem pendidikan pesantren: Suatu kajian tentang unsur dan nilai sistem pendidikan pesantren. Jakarta: INIS.
Muhadjir, Noeng. (2007). Metodologi keilmuan: Paradigma kualitatif kuantitatif dan mixed. (ed. V-revisi).Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.
Musthofa, A. & Aly, A. (1999). Sejarah pendidikan Islam: Untuk Fakultas Tarbiyah Komponen MKDK. Bandung: PT Pustaka Setia.
Peraturan pemerintahan tentang pelaksanaan undang-undang nomor 2 tahun 1989 tentang system pendidikan nasional (1990). Jakarta: Armas Duta Jaya.
Pidarta, M. (1997). Landasan kependidikan: Stimulus pendidikan bercorak Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineke Cipta.
Prunty, J.J. (1984). A critical reformation of educational policy analysis. Victoria: Deakin University Printery.
Rahman, Fazlur. (1984). Islam. (Terjemahan Ahsin Muhammad). New York: Anchor Books. (Buku Asli diterbitkan tahun 1979).
Richardson, J. J. (Ed.). (1993). Pressure groups. New York: Oxford University.
Ross, T. W. & Bailey, G. D. (1994). Reform, restructuring, and transformation – terms ini search of definition which will determine our fate as a nation in the 21st century, http://Proquest.Umi.com/. Download: Desember 2005.
Seidman, E. (1983). Handbook of social intervention. Beverly Hill/London/ New Delhi: Sage Publication.
Shrode, A.W. & Voich, JR. (1974). Organization and management: Basic systems concept. Malaysia: Malaysia by Irwin Book Company.
Sirozi, M. (2004). Politik kebijakan pendidikan di Indonesia: Peran tokoh-tokoh Islam dalam penyusunan UU. No. 2/1989. Leiden –Jakarta: INIS.
Squires, D. A., et al. (1983). Effective school and classroom: A research-based perspecticve. Alexandria: association for supervision and curriculum development.
Steenbrink, K. A. (1994). Pesantren madrasah sekolah: Pendidikan Islam dalam kurun modern. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Suwito & Fauzan, (Eds.). (2004). Perkembangan pendidikan Islam di nusantara: Studi perkembangan sejarah dari abad 20M M. Bandung, Angkasa.
Tafsir, Ahmad. (2002). Metodologi pengajaran agama Islam. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Tajab, et al. (1996). Dasar-dasar kependidikan Islam: Suatu pengantar pendidikan Islam. Surabaya: Karya Aditama.
Taylor, S. et al. (1997). Educational policy and the politics of change. London: Routledge.
Wirosukerto, A. H, et al. (1996). Pembaharuan pendidikan dan pengajaran Islam yang diselenggarakan oleh pergerakan Muhammadiyah. Singosari-Malang.
Worthen, B. R. & Sanders, J. R. (t.t.). Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Worthingthon, Ohio: Charles A. Jones Publishing Company.
Zuhairini, et al. (2004). Sejarah pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Bekerja- sama dengan Dirjen Bagais Departeme Agama RI.