•  
  •  
 

Keywords

bank soal, tingkat kesulitan, daya beda, pseudo guessing, expert judgment, informasi butir dan tes

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan rintisan bank soal Bahasa Inggris SMP kelas VIII pada tingkat provinsi dengan memperhatikan (1) karakteristik soal Ulangan Kenaikan Kelas (UKK); (2) karakteristik butir-butir soal; (3) jumlah butir soal yang memenuhi standar. Metode yang digunakan adalah pengembangan dengan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif. Sam-pel sebanyak 6554 respon siswa (lembar jawab). Perangkat tes dianalisis kesesuaian indikatornya dengan Standar Kompetensi (SK) dan Kompetensi Dasar (KD) yang telah ditentukan, serta ditelaah secara kualitatif oleh ahli berdasarkan kriteria kons-truksi, bahasa dan materi. Respons siswa dianalisis secara kuantitatif dengan Iteman 3.00, dan Bilog MG 3.0 3 PL untuk mendapatkan informasi tentang tingkat kesulitan, daya beda, pseudoguessing, serta informasi butir. Bank soal yang dihasilkan masuk kategori baik dilihat dari (1) Hasil analisis kualitatif dari 150 butir soal, sebanyak 105 butir soal (70%) dinyatakan baik. (2) Hasil analisis kuantitatif dengan program Iteman 3.00 diperoleh 115 butir soal tergolong baik. (3) Analisis dengan Bilog MG 3 PL 77 butir soal (66,96%) masuk kategori baik.

Kata kunci: bank soal, tingkat kesulitan, daya beda, pseudo guessing, expert judgment, informasi butir dan tes

______________________________________________________________

THE ITEM CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FINAL SEMESTER TEST AS A PREPARATION FOR ENGLISH ITEM BANK Abstract This research aims at developing a pilot english test item bank of the 2nd grade junior high school based on: (1) the characterisctics of test items for final semester test; (2) the total number of test items for the 2nd grade junior high school in Yogyakarta Special Province. This descriptive quantitative research used 6554 samples of students' answer sheets in 2009 and also employs expert judgment to review the construct, language, as well as the materials of the questions. Students' responses were also analyzed by using Iteman 3.00, Bilog MG 3.0 3 PL. The result of qualitative analysis with expert judgment which shows that 105 out of the 150 test items are categorized as "good", and the other are "bad". The quantitative analysis with Iteman 3.00 shows that 115 out of the 150 test items are categorized as "good" and the quantitative analysis with Bilog MG 3.00 3 PL shows that 67% test items are categorized as good.

Keywords: item bank, level of difficulty, discrimination index, pseudoguessing, expert judgment, item and test information function

First Page

92

Last Page

114

Issue

1

Volume

15

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v15i1.1089

References

Bachman, L.F. and Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford University press: Oxford.

Chang, Chih-Chung. (2005). Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Evaluation and program planning journal, 24, 251-215

Depdikbud. (1995). Petunjuk Pelaksanaan pengembangan bank soal di wilayah. Balitbang: Jakarta.

Dikmenum. (2006). Panduan analisis butir soal. Diambil pada 21 Juli 2009, dari http://www.dikmenum.go.id/dataapp/kurikulum/5.%20PERANGKAT%20PENILAIAN%20KTSP%20SMA/6.%20ANALISIS%20BUTIR%20SOAL/PANDUAN%20ANALISIS%20BUTIR% 20SOAL.doc.

Eid, G. K. (2005). The effects of sample size on the equating test items. Proquest Education Journals. (165-180). Kuwait University.

Fernandes, H.J.X. (1984). Testing and measurement. National Education Planning, Evaluation and Curriculum Development: Jakarta.

Mardapi, Djemari. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Mitra Cendikia: Yogyakarta.

Wright, B.D. and Mark H.S.(1979). Best test design. Mesa Press. Chicago.

Download

Share

COinS