Keywords
TPA, analisis butir, validitas prediksi
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Karakteristik butir dan subtes dari Tes Potensi Akademik (TPA) versi 07A diteliti berdasarkan data jawaban 198 pelamar Program Magister Psikologi UGM tahun 2007, sementara validitas prediksi tes dianalisis berdasarkan data jawaban 80 mahasiswa yang diterima. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa butir-butir subtes verbal, kuantitatif, dan penalaran memiliki tingkat kesulitan sedang, indeks daya beda sangat baik, dan distraktor berfungsi dengan baik. Semua skor subtes memiliki koefisien reliabilitas yang sangat tinggi, demikian juga skor TPA. Namun, analisis validitas skor TPA kurang dapat memprediksi IPK semester pertama. Kata kunci: TPA, analisis butir, validitas prediksi
First Page
231
Last Page
250
Issue
2
Volume
12
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/pep.v12i2.1429
Recommended Citation
Azwar, Saifuddin
(2008)
"KUALITAS TES POTENSI AKADEMIK VERSI 07A,"
Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Vol. 12:
Iss.
2, Article 5.
DOI: 10.21831/pep.v12i2.1429
Available at:
https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/jpep/vol12/iss2/5
References
Allen, M. J. & Yen, W.M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Azwar, S. (1997).Reliabilitas dan validitas (edisi ke 3). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
_____.(2007). Tes Potensi Akademik-Versi 07A. Yogyakarta:Sigma Alpha Test Specialist.
Crocker,L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. ForthWorth: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston,INC.
Cronbach,L.J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing(3rded.). New York, NY:Harper and Row.GRE-bulletin.(1980). GRE General Tests, 1980.http://www.ets.org/MediTests/GRE/pdf/0708_gre_bulletin.pdf
Guilford, J.P. (1953). The correlation of an item with a composite of the remaining items in a test. Educational and Psychological Measurement,13, 1, 87-93.
_____.(1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rded.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hartigan,J.A., & Wigdor, A.K. (Eds.) (1989). Fairness in employment testing: Validity generalization, minority issues, and the general aptitude test battery. Washington,DC: National Academy Press.
Kehoe,J. (1997). Basic item analysis for multiple-choice tests. ERIC Digest.http:/www.ericdigests.org/1997-1/basic.html
Kaufman,A.S. (1972). Restriction of range: Questions and answers. Test Service Bulletin. The Psychological Corporation, 59.
Scorepak. (2005). Item analysis. Office of Educational Assessment, University of Washington.http://www.washington.edu/oea/pdfs/resources/item analysis.pdf.
Thorndike,R.M., Cunningham, G.K.,Thorndike,R.L., & Hagen, E.P. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education. New York. NY:Macmillan Publishing Company.
Wolf,R. (1967). Evaluation of several formulae for correction of item-total correlations in item analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 1,2 1-26.
Zucker,S. (2003). Fundamentals of standardized testing. Harcourt Assessment Report, Harcourt Assessment,Inc.
