•  
  •  
 

REID (Research and Evaluation in Education)

Keywords

teacher's performance, inhibiting factors, teaching duties

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This research aims to examine the components and inhibiting factors of the teacher's work performance in the teaching assignments of Buddhist education teachers. The authors believe that the theoretical as well as the practical problems of Buddhist education teachers can be solved by examining its components and the inhibiting factors. This research was developmental research that begins by compiling the component of performance instrument and the inhibiting factors instrument through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The data were then analyzed through regression analysis. The subjects of research were Buddhist education teachers in Central Java, Indonesia. The results of the research show the values of Anti-image > 0.5 for 7 indicators. Meanwhile, the loading factor was bigger than 0.5 for each component. The model had RMSEA ‰¤ 0.05, Chi-Square (X²) > 0.05, P = 0.55, the GFI was 0.97, which means the model was fit. The teaching performance components of Buddhist education teacher include planning the learning program, implementing the learning program, and evaluating the learning program. The inhibiting factors of the teacher's performance are the additional tasks, the classroom atmosphere, conflict, and work pressure. This research has proved that the inhibiting factors have a negative impact on the teaching performance of Buddhist education teachers.

Page Range

136-143

Issue

2

Volume

4

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/reid.v4i2.21940

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/21940

References

Amin, H. U., & Khan, A. R. (2009). Acquiring knowledge for evaluation of teachers' performance in higher education - using a questionnaire. (IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (Vol. 2).

Azwar, S. (2013). Penyusunan skala psikologi (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Basuki, H. (2004). Analisis faktor konfirmatori (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) dalam materi pelatihan SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) angkatan IV, Surabaya. Surabaya: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Airlangga.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

Coakes, S. J., & Steed, L. G. (1996). SPSS version 14.0 for Windows: Analysis without anguish. Melbourne: Jacaranda Wiley.

Ghozali, I. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Teori, konsep, dan aplikasi dengan program Lisrel 8.80. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kim, J.-O., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. London: Sage Publications.

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia.

Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). Evaluating stress: A book of resources. (C. P. Zalaquett & R. J. Wood, Eds.) (3rd ed.). Lanham, Md., & London: The Scarecrow Press.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2017). Ikhtisar data pendidikan tahun 2016/2017. Jakarta. Retrieved from http://publikasi.data.kemdikbud.go.id/uploadDir/isi_FC1DCA36-A9D8-4688-8E5F-0FB5ED1DE869_.pdf

Sadtyadi, H. (2016). Evaluasi kinerja guru Pendidikan Agama Buddha dan alumni Prodi Dharmacarya. Wonogiri: STABN Raden Wijaya.

Sadtyadi, H., & Kartowagiran, B. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kinerja guru sekolah dasar berbasis tugas pokok dan fungsi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 290-304. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i2.2867

Sudarwan, D. (2002). Inovasi pendidikan dalam upaya peningkatan profesionalisme tenaga kependidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Suryadarma, D., Suryahadi, A., & Sumarto, S. (2005). Penentu kinerja murid sekolah dasar di Indonesia. Jakarta: Semeru, Yertas Verja.

Download

Share

COinS