•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi

Keywords

ARIAS learning model, creativity, learning outcomes

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This study aims to obtain information about: (1) differences in learning outcomes between students who study using the ARIAS learning model and students who learn using direct learning (DL); (2) differences in learning outcomes between students who have high creativity and students who have low creativity; and (3) whether the relationship between the use of learning models and learning outcomes in continental food processing is influenced by students' creativity. This experimental study was conducted using a 2 x 2 factorial design, with the moderator variable being students' creativity. In the experiment, the separation of the level of student creativity was not carried out significantly. Students are called to have high creativity, if they have a score higher or equal to the median group (ian median), while students are called to have low creativity, if they have a score less than or below the median (

Page Range

1-10

Issue

1

Volume

9

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jpv.v9i1.22894

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv/article/view/22894

References

Ambiyar, A., Yulastri, A., Putri, Y. E., & Wulansari, R. E. (2018). An evaluation of students industrial training courses implementation at higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 8(3), 258. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v8i3.20775

Craft, A. (2004). Membangun kreativitas anak. Depok: Insani Pers.

Hadlock, H., Wells, S., Hall, J., Clifford, J., Winowich, N., & Burns, J. (2008). From practice to entrepreneurship: rethinking the learning factory approach. In IAJC IJME International Conference.

Hernawan, A. H., Susilana, R., Julaeha, S., & Sanjaya, W. (2006). Pengembangan kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Hidayat, R., & Patras, Y. E. (2015). Pendidikan Abad 21 dan Kurikulum 2013. Bogor: Universitas Pakuan.

Hindayani, S. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Arias (Assurance, Relevance, Interst, Assessment dan Satisfaction) terhadap hasil belajar matematika di SD.Skripsi.Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Johnson, E. B. (2014). CTL-Contextual teaching and learning. (I. Setiawan, Trans.). Bandung: Kaifa.

Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2011). Model of teaching. Model-model pengajaran. (A. Fawaid & A. Mirza, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Marrapodi, J. (2003). Critical thinking and creativity an overview and comparison of the theories. In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements of ED7590 Critical Thinking and Adult Education. Providence.

Muslim, S. (2013). Tes Kinerja (performace test) dalam bidang pendidikan teknologi dan kejuruan. In Seminar Teknik Elektro dan Pendidikan Teknik Elektro.

Muslim, S., Gitama, N. P., Suprianto, B., Rahmadyanti, E., & Kusumawati, N. (2018). Influence of learning media based on adobe flash professional to psychomotor domain learning outcomes on plc courses viewed from level of creative thinking student. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 8(3), 267. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v8i3.21552

Ningsih, K. (2010). Efektivitas model pembelajaran ARIAS berbasis contextual teaching and learning dalam meningkatkan pencapaian kompetensi dasar sains pada siswa SMP Kota Pontianak. Guru Membangun, 24(2).

Praptinasari, S. (2012). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assesment, and Satisfaction (Arias) terhadap hasil belajar biologi siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Al Islam 1 Surakarta. Skripsi. Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS.

Rentzos, L., Doukas, M., Mavrikios, D., Mourtzis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2014). Integrating manufacturing education with industrial practice using teaching factory paradigm: a construction equipment application. Procedia CIRP, 17, 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.126

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspektif (teori teori pembelajaran: perspektif pendidikan). (E. Hamdiah & R. Fajar, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.Sharan, S. (2012). The handbook of cooperative learning. (S. Prawoto, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Familia (Grup Relasi Inti Media).

Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity throughinstruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, 29(3), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2008). Model pembelajaran matematika berbasis pengajuan dan pemecahanmasalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.Sopah, D. (2001). Pengembangan dan penggunaan model pembelajaran ARIAS. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 31, 455–469.

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10

Torrance, E. P. (1965). Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its rowth. Daedalus, 94(3), 663–681.

Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting educational research(5th ed.). Orlondo, FL: Harcourt Brace.

White, J., & Smerdon, L. (2008). Performing education. Journal of Artistic and Creative Education, 2(1), 72–92.

Yasa, A. (2014). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Arias berbantuan media gambar terhadap hasil belajar IPS siswa kelas III SD No. 2 Kuta Kabupaten Badung. Skripsi. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Share

COinS