Implementasi problem-based learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif, psikomotor, dan afektif siswa di SMK

Authors

Muhammad Nurtanto, PTK PPs UNY Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Herminarto Sofyan, PTK PPs UNY Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keywords

problem-based learning, aspek kognitif, aspek psikomotor, aspek afektif, hasil belajar

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan keaktifan pembelajaran dan hasil belajar siswa pada kompetensi dasar sistem pengapian konvensional dalam mengimplementasikan metode problembased learning. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian tindakan kelas yang dilaksanakan dalam dua siklus, masing-masing siklus terdiri dari empat tahapan: perencanaan, pelaksanaan, pengamatan, dan refleksi. Data dianalisa secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sebagai berikut: (1) keaktifan siswa meningkat sebesar 11,20%; (2) keaktifan siswa kategori sangat tinggi sebanyak 36 siswa dan kategori tinggi sebanyak 3 siswa; (3) hasil belajar siswa aspek kognitif, psikomotor, dan afektif mengalami peningkatan masing-masing sebesar 5,32%, 5,03%, dan 2,05%; dan (4) hasil belajar siswa aspek kognitif, psikomotor dan afektif yang mencapai kompetensi minimal masingmasing sebanyak 36 siswa (92,31%), 36 siswa (92,31%), dan 38 siswa (97,40%) dari 39 jumlah siswa melalui penerapan problem-based learning. Kata kunci: problem-based learning, aspek kognitif, aspek psikomotor, aspek afektif, hasil belajar

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING TO IMPROVE LEARNING OUTCOMES OF COGNITIVE, PSYCHOMOTOR, AND AFFECTIVE OF STUDENTS IN VOCATIONAL SCHOOL

Abstract

This study aims to improve the learning activities and learning outcomes in learning conventional ignition system by implementing problem-based learning method. This study used a classroom action research which was conducted in two cycles, each cycle consisted of four phases: planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The data were analyzed descriptively. The study results show that: (1) the learning activities increase as much as 11,20%, (2) the category of learning activities is very high for 36 students and high for 3 students, (3) the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective aspects in learning outcomes of students increasing which each part is 5,32%, 5,03%, and 2,05%, (4) the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective aspects in the learning outcomes reach minimum value criteria which each part is 36 students (92,31%), 36 students (92,31%), and 38 students (97,40%) from 39 students with the implementation of problem-based learning

Page Range

352-364

Issue

3

Volume

5

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jpv.v5i3.6489

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv/article/view/6489

Recommended Citation

Nurtanto, M., & Sofyan, H. (2015). Implementasi problem-based learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif, psikomotor, dan afektif siswa di SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 5(3), 352-364. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v5i3.6489

References

Abdulloh Hamid & Putu Sudira. (2013). "Penanaman Nilai-Nilai Karakter Siswa SMK Salafiyah Prodi TKJ Kajen Margoyoso Pati Jawa Tengah." Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, Vol. 3, No. 2, 138-152.

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives. New York, San Francisco, Boston: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Arends, R. I. (2008). Belajar untuk Mengajar. (Terjemahan Helly Prajitno Soetjipto & Sri Mulyantini Soetjipto). New York: McGraw Hills. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2007).

Bloom, B.S (ed). (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objective: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company.

Brown, A., Kirpal, S., & Rauner, F. (2007). Identitas at Work. Dordrecht: Springer.

Djemari Mardapi. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non Tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia Press.

Donlinger, M. J. & McLeod, J. K. (2015). "Solving Real World Problems with Alternate Reality Gaming: Student Experiences in the Globalvillage Playground Capstone Course Design." Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, Vol. 9 (2), No. 1541-5014.

Endang Mulyatiningsih. (2010, Agustus). "Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif, Inovatif, Efektif dan Menyenangkan (PAIKEM)." Makalah disajikan dalam Diklat Peningkatan Kompetensi Pengawas dalam Rangka Penjamin Mutu Pendidikan, di P4TK Bisnis dan Pariwisata.

Fogarty, R. (1997). Problem Learning & Other Curriculum Models for the Multiple Intelligences Classroom. SkyLight: Pearson.

Hande, S., Mohammed, C. A., & Komattil, R. (2014). "Acquisition of Knowledge, Generic Skills, and Attitudes through Problem-Based Learning: Student Perspectives of a Hybrid Curriculum." Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 1-5.

Huitt, W. (2011). "Bloom et al.’s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain." Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Diakses pada tanggal 18 Agustus 2014 dari http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cogsys/bloom.html [pdf].

Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner. Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Leighbody, G. B., & Kidd, D. M. (1968). Methods of Teaching Shop and Technical Subjects. New York: Delmar Publishers.

Madya, Aka. J. J., & J. J. (2009). A Brief Guide to Learning Domains (Cognitive, Psychomotor, & Affective) Life Skill. Selangor, Malaysia: OBE-LOKI Workshop FSG.

Masek, A., & Yamin, S. (2011). "Problem Based Learning for Epistemological Competence: The Knowledge Acquisition Perspective." Journal of Technical Education and Training (JTET), Vol. 3, No. 1, 29-26.

McTaggart, R. (1991). Action Research: A Short Modern History. Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Miftahul Huda. (2014). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Namdeo, R. P. (2012). "Constructivism and Pedagogical Strategies." Edusearch, Vol. 3, No. 2, 0976-1160.

Nana Sudjana. (2013). Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Omar, N. Et. al. (2011). "Automated Analysis of Exam Questions According to Bloom’s Taxonomy." Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59 (2012), 297-303.

Pardjono. dkk. (2007). Panduan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian UNY.

Presiden. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 19, tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang – Undang RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Rusman. (2011). Model-Model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (2001). Problem-Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework. Bloomington: Indiana University.

Sharma, S. (2012). "Constructivism: A New Paradigm in Education." Edusearch, Vol. 3, No. 2, 0976-1160.

Tan, Oon-Seng. (2004). Enhancing Thinking Through Problem-Based Learning Approaches: International Perspectives. Singapore: (a division of).

Tan, Oon-Seng. (2009). Problem-Based Learning and Creativity. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd.

Thomas, K. (2004). Learning Taxonomies in the Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Domain. Alchemy: Rocky Mountain.

Vardi, I. & Ciccarelli, M. (2008). "Overcoming Problems in Problem-Based Learning: A Trial of Strategies in an Undergraduate Unit." Innovations in Educational and Teaching International, Vol. 45, No. 4, 345-354.

Wardiman Djojonegoro. (1998). Pengembangan Sumberdaya Manusia: Melalui Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK). Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Warsono & Hariyanto. (2013). Pembelajaran Aktif Teori dan Asesmen. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wina Sanjaya. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.