•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi

Keywords

motivasi, kemandirian, hasil belajar, pembelajaran kooperatif

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar, kemandirian dan hasil belajar siswa melalui strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) di SMKN 1 Saptosari. Penelitian ini merupakan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) dengan empat tahapan yaitu perencanaan, pelaksanaan, pengamatan dan refleksi. Penelitian di SMKN 1 Saptosari dengan subyek penelitian siswa kelas X Teknik Audio Video A. Penelitian melibatkan seorang kolaborator yang berasal dari teman sejawat. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan dokumentasi, lembar observasi kelas dan lembar ceklist. Data penelitian yang menunjukkan adanya perubahan dari tindakan yang diberikan diperoleh dari kolaborator. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan statistik deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) melalui strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD sebanyak 76,6% siswa meningkat motivasinya, (2) melalui strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD sebanyak 69% siswa meningkat kemandiriannya, dan (3) pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD mampu meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa hingga memenuhi Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal (KKM).

IMPROVING STUDENT'S MOTIVATION, AUTONOMY AND LEARNING OUTCOMES THROUGH THE COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN THE LEARNING OF BASIC AUDIO SIGNAL

Abstract

This study aims to improve student's learning motivation, autonomy, and learning outcomes through the cooperative learning strategy of the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) type at SMKN 1 Saptosari. This was a classroom action research (CAR) study consisting of four stages, i.e. planning, action, observation, and reflection. It was conducted in SMKN 1 Saptosari and the research subjects were Grade X students of Audio Video Engineering A. It involved a collaborator who was a colleague. The data collecting techniques were documentation, a classroom observation sheet, and a checklist. The research data showing changes as a result of the actions were obtained from the collaborator. The data were analyzed by means of the descriptive technique. The results of the study showed that: (1) through the cooperative learning of the STAD type was capable of improving the motivation of 76.6% of the students, (2) the cooperative learning of the STAD type was capable of improving the autonomy of 69% of the students, and (3) the cooperative learning of the STAD type was capable of improving the students' learning outcomes to satisfy the Minimum Mastery Criterion (MMC).

Page Range

55-73

Issue

1

Volume

5

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jpv.v5i1.6068

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv/article/view/6068

References

Berikut ini referensi yang telah disusun dengan lebih rapi:

Ali, M., & Asrori, M. (2008). Psikologi remaja: perkembangan peserta didik. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Borich, G. D. (2007). Effective teaching methods. Ohio: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Capel, S., Leask, M., & Turner, T. (1997). Learning to teach in the secondary school. London: Routledge.

Chance, P. L. (2009). Introduction to educational leadership & organizational behavior. New York: Eye On Education.

Djaali. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Djojonegoro, W. (1998). Pengembangan sumber daya manusia melalui SMK. Jakarta: Jaya Agung Offset.

Hamalik, O. (2002). Psikologi belajar mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.

Hamzah, B. U. (2011). Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1996). Models of teaching. United States of America: A Simon & Schuster Company.

Kidd, W., & Czerniawski, G. (2010). Successful teaching: theory, practice and reflection. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Killen, R. (2009). Effective teaching strategies: lessons from research and practice. Victoria: Cengage Learning Australia.

Klein, B. S. (2010). Learning. Mississippi: McGraw Hill.

Marsh, C. (1996). Handbook for beginning teachers. Sydney: Addition Wesley Longman Pty Limited.

McLean, A. (2009). Motivating every learner. London: SAGE.

Monks. (1994). Psikologi perkembangan: pengantar dalam berbagai bagian. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Reid, G. (2009). Memotivasi siswa di kelas: gagasan dan strategi. London: Paul Champman Publishing. (Terjemahan Hartati Widiastuti. Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2007).

Ringer, R. (1990). The 19 habits of highly successful people: powerful strategies for personal triumph. Kuala Lumpur: Wyn Wood Press.

Sanjaya, W. (2007). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

Schunk, H. D., et al. (2010). Motivation in education. London: Pearson.

Setiadi, R. (22 April 2012). Mengenal pendidikan berkarakter. Diambil dari http://edukasi.kompasiana.com/2012/04/22/mengenal-pendidikan-berkarakter/ pada tanggal 5 Agustus 2012.

Skiba, R., & Peterson, R. Cooperative Learning. Diambil pada tanggal 28 November 2012 dari www.indiana.edu/~safeschl.

Strommen, E. (1995). Cooperative Learning. Journal of Electronic Learning, 14, 24-35.

Slavin, E. R. (1998). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. London: Allyn and Beacon.

Slavin, E. R. (2005). Cooperative Learning. (Terjemahan Nerulita Yusron). London: Allyn and Bacon.

Suprijono, A. (2010). Cooperative learning: teori dan aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Uno, H. B. (2011). Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Roger, T., & David, W. J. (2009). An Overview of Cooperative Learning. Diambil pada tanggal 20 Agustus 2012 dari http://www.co-operation.org/pages/overviewpaper.html.

Share

COinS