Pengaruh problem-based learning terhadap hasil belajar ditinjau dari motivasi belajar PLC di SMK

Authors

Bekti Wulandari, Pendidikan Teknik Informatika FT UNY
Herman Dwi Surjono, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran pemrograman sistem kendali PLC antara siswa yang diajar dengan metode PBL dengan siswa yang diajar dengan metode demonstrasi, (2) pengaruh interaksi antara metode PBL dan metode demonstrasi dengan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa, (3) perbedaan hasil belajar siswa antara siswa yang diajar dengan metode PBL dengan yang diajar dengan metode demonstrasi ditinjau dari motivasi belajar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain faktorial yang dilakukan dengan memberikan perlakuan metode pembelajaran. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan uji-t dan ANAVA dengan program SPSS 16. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang diajar dengan metode PBL dengan yang diajar dengan metode demonstrasi, (2) tidak terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara metode PBL dan demonstrasi dengan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar, (3) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang diajar dengan metode PBL dengan yang diajar dengan metode demonstrasi ditinjau dari motivasi tinggi dan rendah.

THE EFFECT OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES SEEN FROM MOTIVATION ON THE SUBJECT MATTER OF PLC IN SMK

Abstract

This study aimed to determine: (1) the difference in learning outcomes in the subject of PLC control system programming between the students taught using the PBL method and those taught using the demonstration method, (2) the effect of the interaction among the PBL method and demonstration learning method with motivation on the learning outcomes, (3) difference in students' learning outcomes between the students taught using the PBL method and those taught using the demonstration learning method in terms of motivation to learn. This study was a quasiexperimental study with a factorial design done by giving treatment in learning methods. The techniques of data analysis were T test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS 16. The results show that: (1) there is a difference in learning outcomes between the students taught using the PBL method compared to those taught using the demonstration learning method, (2) there is no interactional effect between PBL and demonstration learning methods with motivation on the students' learning outcome, (3) there is a difference in the learning outcome between students taught using the PBL method and those taught using the demonstration learning method in terms of students with high and low motivation.

Page Range

178-191

Issue

2

Volume

3

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/jpv.v3i2.1600

Source

https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv/article/view/1600

Recommended Citation

Wulandari, B., & Surjono, H. D. (2013). Pengaruh problem-based learning terhadap hasil belajar ditinjau dari motivasi belajar PLC di SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 3(2), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v3i2.1600

References

Alderman, M. K. (2004). Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Amir, M. Taufiq. (2009). Inovasi pendidikan melalui problem based learning. Bagaimana pendidik memberdayakan pemelajar di era pengetahuan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Arends, Richard. I. (2008). Belajar untuk mengajar. Edisi ke tujuh alih bahasa oleh helly prayitno dan Sri Mulyantani Prayitno dari judul learning to teach. Seven edition. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.

Barbara. B. Levin. (2001). Energizing teacher education and profesional development with problem based learning. United States: ASCD.

Blessing, L.T.M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, A design research methodology. London: Springer.

Bloom, B (ed). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1 cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.

Dai, D.Y., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual development and functioning. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Erik, D.G., & Anette, K. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal Engng Ed., 19(5), 657-662.

Glazer, E. (2001). Problem based instruction from emerging perspectives on learn- ing, teaching, and technology. Diambil pada tanggal 31 Mei 2013, dari http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/index.php?title= Problem_Based_Instruction

Hamzah. B. Uno. (2011). Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russel, J.,D. (1989). Instructional and new technologies of instruction. New York: Macmillan, Inc.

Ibrahim, B., Erdal, S., Mustafa, S. (2009). The effect of problem-based leraning instruction on university students’ perfermance of conceptual and quantitative problems in gas concepts. Eurosia Jurnal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(2), 153-156

Linda, T. & Sara, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: problem-based learning for K–16 education. ASCD.

Maggi, S. & Claire H.M. (2004). Foundations of problem-based learning. New York: Open University Press.

McLean, Alan. (2009). Motivating every learner. London: Sage.

Nana Sudjana. (2010). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Philip, H., & Edwin, M.B. (2007). A problem-based approach for management education. The Netherlands: Springer.

Pusdiklatkes, (2004). Bahan pembelajaran problem based learning (belajar berdasar masalah). Diambil pada tanggal 24 Desember 2012. dari http://www.lrckesehatan.net/cdroms_ht m/pbl/pbl.htm

Rusman. (2012). Model-model pembelajaran mengembangkan profesional guru. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sardiman, A. M. (2012). Interaksi & motivasi belajar mengajar. Cetakan ke-21. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L. & Russell, J. D. (2007). Instructional technology and media for learning (9th ed). Colombus: Merrill.

Sugihartono, dkk. (2007). Psikologi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Suyono dan Hariyanto. (2011). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Syaiful Bahri Djamarah dan Azwan Zain. (2006). Strategi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Syaiful Bahri Djamarah. (2011). Psikologi belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Tan, Oon-Seng. (2003). Problem based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Cengage Learning.

Tan, Oon-Seng. (2004). Enhancing thingking through problem-based learning approaches. Cengage Learning.

Trianto. (2009). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovativ-progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Oemar, Hamalik. (2007). Proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.

Wang, S. (2001). Motivation: General overview of theories from Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Diambil pada tanggal 24 Desember 2012, dari http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/index.php?title=Motivation

Wina, Sanjaya. (2008). Strategi pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana prenada Media.

Winataputra, U. S., et al. (2008). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Terbuka.

Woolfolk, Anita. (2007). Educational psychology. Boston: Pearson.

Zabit, M. N. M, (2010). Problem-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in teaching business education in malaysia: A literature review. American Journal of Bussiness Education, 3(6).