Does the policy regarding the role of the national examination in determining graduation affect student achievement?

Authors

Rasmuin Rasmuin, Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin, Indonesia

Document Type

Article

Abstract

From 2004 to 2018, the national examination (NE) has undergone three policy changes regarding its role in determining graduation. The NE score was decided to be the sole determining factor for student graduation in the period 2004 to 2010, with the school examination score being the determinant of student graduation from 2011 to 2015 and no longer a determinant of student graduation from 2016 to 2018 period. This study aimed to analyze the pattern of influence of the NE policy as a determinant of graduation on student achievement at junior, senior, and vocational high schools. This study used data on student achievement for 15 years in the subjects tested on the NE obtained from the Research and Development Center of the Indonesian Ministry of National Education. Data analysis was done descriptively by estimating students' mean achievement on the NE and then analyzing the mean trend. By analyzing the trend of student scores' mean on the subjects tested on the NE at the junior high school, senior high school, and vocational high school levels, the mean tends to increase in the period 2004 to 2010, tends to be less stable and decrease in the period 2011 to 2015, and tends to decline again when the NE score is no longer used as a determinant of graduation in the period 2016 to 2018. These results indicate that the policy on using NE scores in determining graduation influences student achievement in junior high school, senior high school, and vocational high school levels.

First Page

160

Last Page

176

Issue

2

Volume

26

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v26i2.54422

Recommended Citation

Rasmuin, Rasmuin (2022) "Does the policy regarding the role of the national examination in determining graduation affect student achievement?," Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Vol. 26: Iss. 2, Article 4.
DOI: 10.21831/pep.v26i2.54422
Available at: https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/jpep/vol26/iss2/4

References

Alivi, F. J., Kartianom, K., Rahmawati, R., Hadiana, D., Zulaiha, R., & Retnawati, H. (2021). Alasan mutu pendidikan Indonesia turun [Reasons why the quality of education in Indonesia has fallen]. In H. Retnawati (Ed.), Kontribusi pemikiran: Mengenang Prof. Djemari Mardapi, Ph.D. (pp. 300-314). UNY Press.

Amua-Sekyi, E. T. (2016). Assessment, student learning and classroom practice: A review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 1-6.

Anazifa, R. D., Rahmawati, R., Zulaiha, R., Retnawati, H., Hadiana, D., & Hasan, D. (2021). Tren capaian keberhasilan pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia siswa SMP, SMA, dan SMK. In H. Retnawati (Ed.), Kontribusi pemikiran: Mengenang Prof. Djemari Mardapi, Ph.D. (pp. 283-299). UNY Press.

Arlinwibowo, J., Apino, E., Rahmawati, R., Zulaiha, R., Hadiana, D., & Kartianom, K. (2021). Berhubungankah jumlah jurusan dan prestasi siswa SMK? [Is there a relationship between the number of majors and the achievement of vocational high school students?]. In H. Retnawati (Ed.), Kontribusi pemikiran: Mengenang Prof. Djemari Mardapi, Ph.D. (pp. 207-224). UNY Press.

Ashadi, A., & Rice, S. (2016). High stakes testing and teacher access to professional opportunities: Lessons from Indonesia. Journal of Education Policy, 31(6), 727-741. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1193901.

Attali, Y. (2016). Effort in low-stakes assessments: What does it take to perform as well as in a high-stakes setting? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 1045-1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416634789.

Barry, C. L., & Finney, S. J. (2016). Modeling change in effort across a low-stakes testing session: A latent growth curve modeling approach. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(1), 46-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2015.1102914.

CERI. (2008). Assessment for learning"”The case for formative assessment. Author. https://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40600533.pdf.

Cole, J. S., & Osterlind, S. J. (2008). Investigating differences between low- and high-stakes test performance on a general education exam. The Journal of General Education, 57(2), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.2307/27798099.

Demir, C. G., & Keleş, Ö. K. (2021). The impact of high-stakes testing on the teaching and learning processes of mathematics. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021269677.

Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55(2), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989.

Effendi, T., & Suyudi, I. (2017). The impacts of English national examination in Indonesia. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 81, 236-239. https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-16.2017.52.

Frenette, M., & Chan, P. C. W. (2015). Academic outcomes of public and private high school students: What lies behind the differences? Statistics Canada.

Guill, K., & Lintorf, K. (2019). Private tutoring when stakes are high: Insights from the transition from primary to secondary school in Germany. International Journal of Educational Development, 65, 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.08.001.

Hartaty, W. (2017). The impacts of the 2015 national examination policy in Indonesia on english language teaching. Proceedings of the Fifth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching (ISELT-5), 5, 355-358.

Jailani, J. (2021). Behind the change of the national examination policy in Indonesia. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 5(2), 158-177. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v5i2.44712.

Jonsson, A., & Leden, L. (2019). The ambiguous influence of high-stakes testing on science teaching in Sweden. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1926-1943. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1647474.

Mardapi, D., & Kartowagiran, B. (2009). Dampak ujian nasional [The impact of the national examination]. Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/130693812/penelitian/6-Dampak+Ujian+Nasional.pdf.

Mikre, F. (2010). The roles of assessment in curriculum practice and enhancement of learning. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 5(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesc.v5i2.65376.

Minarechová, M. (2012). Negative impacts of high-stakes testing. Journal of Pedagogy, 3(1), 82-100. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10159-012-0004-x.

Ministry of National Education of Indonesia. (2005a). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional nomor 20 tahun 2005 tentang ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2005/2006 [Regulation of the Minister of National Education number 20 of 2005 on national examination for the academic year of 2005/2006].

Ministry of National Education of Indonesia. (2005b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia nomor 1 tahun 2005 tentang ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2004/2005 [Regulation of the Minister of National Education number 1 of 2005 on national examination for the academic year of 2004/2005].

Ministry of National Education of Indonesia. (2010). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional nomor 46 tahun 2010 tentang pelaksanaan ujian sekolah/madrasah dan ujian nasional pada sekolah menengah pertama/madrasah tsanawiyah, sekolah menengah pertama luar biasa, sekolah menengah atas/madrasah aliyah, sekolah menengah atas luar biasa, dan sekolah menengah kejuruan tahun pelajaran 2010/2011 [Regulation of the Minister of National Education number 46 of 2010 on school examination and national examination for academic year of 2010/2011].

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Polesel, J., Rice, S., & Dulfer, N. (2014). The impact of high-stakes testing on curriculum and pedagogy: A teacher perspective from Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 29(5), 640-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.865082.

President of the Republic of Indonesia. (2003). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional [Act of the Republic of Indonesia number 20 of 2003 on national education system].

Ramelan, M., Zulaiha, R., Rafi, I., Rahmawati, R., Hadiana, D., & Kartianom, K. (2021). Bagaimana capaian hasil UN sekolah dengan jumlah siswa banyak? [How are the results of the national examination for schools with a large number of students?]. In H. Retnawati (Ed.), Kontribusi pemikiran: Mengenang Prof. Djemari Mardapi, Ph.D. (pp. 225-247). UNY Press.

Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., Munadi, S., Hadiana, D., Muhardis, M., Apino, E., Djidu, H., Rafi, I., Yusron, E., & Rosyada, M. N. (2019). When national examination no longer determining graduation, will students accomplish it seriously? Indonesian Journal of Educational Assesment, 2(2), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.26499/ijea.v2i2.34.

Retnawati, H., Kartowagiran, B., Arlinwibowo, J., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). Why are the mathematics national examination items difficult and what is teachers' strategy to overcome it? International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10317a.

Rong'uno, S. K. (2017). A comparison academic performance between public and private secondary schools in Wareng District, Kenya. British Journal of Education, 5(11), 58-67.

Saukah, A., & Cahyono, A. E. (2015). National exam in Indonesia and its implications to the teaching and learning of english. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(2), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i2.5583.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2015). Summative and formative assessments in mathematics supporting the goals of the common core standards. Theory Into Practice, 54(3), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1044346.

Silverius, S. (2010). Kontroversi ujian nasional sepanjang masa [National examination controversy of all time]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 16(2), 194-205. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v16i2.446.

Stecher, B. M. (2002). Consequences of large-scale, high-stakes testing on school and classroom practice. In L. S. Hamilton, B. M. Stecher, & S. P. Klein (Eds.), Making sense of test-based accountability in education (pp. 79-100). RAND Corporation.

Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., Gur, B. S., Perc, M., & Ozer, M. (2020). Socioeconomic status and school type as predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 61(1), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0034.

Sutari, V. R. (2017). National examination in Indonesia and its backwash effects: Teachers' perspectives. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 82. https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-16.2017.76.

Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2005). Low examinee effort in low-stakes assessment: Problems and potential solutions. Educational Assessment, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1.

Yusron, E., Djidu, H., Hadiana, D., Zulaiha, R., Rosyada, M. N., & Rahmawati, R. (2021). Materi Bahasa Inggris, Matematika, dan IPA: Apakah sudah dikuasai siswa SMP? [The contents of English, Mathematics, and Science: Have junior high school students mastered it?]. In H. Retnawati (Ed.), Kontribusi pemikiran: Mengenang Prof. Djemari Mardapi, Ph.D. (pp. 264-282). UNY Press.