The evaluation of online school examination implementation using CIPP model

Authors

Sapto Irawan, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga, Indonesia
Danu Prasetyo, Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri 1 Salatiga, Indonesia

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of online school exam conducted at SMK PGRI 1 Salatiga in 2019/2020 Academic Year. This study is descriptive evaluation research using CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model. The research focuses on conducting evaluation activities through four-component aspects (Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation). Data were collected through (1) interviews with the Principal, Deputy Principal for Curriculum, School Examination Committee, and (2) documentation study, conducted by collecting data information related to the implementation of the online school exams at SMK PGRI 1 Salatiga. This study involved 194 subjects consisting of 181 school exam participants and 13 school exam committees at SMK PGRI 1 Salatiga. This evaluation research results can be seen through the four aspects of evaluation component, namely (1) Context in the implementation of online School Exams has been based on a Circular from the Minister of Education and Culture and the Office of Education and Culture of Central Java Province. (2) Inputs in the implementation of online School Exams are in accordance with the planning criteria in implementing school exams, including online application preparation, school exam planning and schemes, network preparation, Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) as committee test organizers. (3) The process of organizing online school exams goes well, but there are technical problems experienced by school exam participants related to internet network. (4) The product in organizing online school exams is in a quite good category, indicated by the results of online school exams carried out in a relatively short time.

First Page

136

Last Page

145

Issue

2

Volume

24

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v24i2.33032

Recommended Citation

Irawan, Sapto and Prasetyo, Danu (2020) "The evaluation of online school examination implementation using CIPP model," Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Vol. 24: Iss. 2, Article 2.
DOI: 10.21831/pep.v24i2.33032
Available at: https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/jpep/vol24/iss2/2

References

Capa-Aydin, Y. (2016). Student evaluation of instruction: Comparison between in-class and online methods. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 112-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.987106

Circular of the Minister of Education and Culture Number 4 of 2020 on the Implementation of Education Policy during the Emergency Spreading of COVID-19, (2020).

Crews, T. B., & Curtis, D. F. (2011). Online course evaluations: Faculty perspective and strategies for improved response rates. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(7), 865-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.493970

Fahrurrohman, A., Ridlo, S., & Nugroho, S. E. (2019). Junior high school students' perception about the computer-based examination with computer-based science evaluation (CBSE). Journal of Innovative Science Education, 8(1), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE.V7I2.25362

Handayani, S., & Krisnadi, I. (2019). Evaluasi program pelaksanaan ujian online siswa berbasis web di SMK Negeri 2 Kota Tangerang Selatan. Academia.Edu, 4(2).

Hémard, D., & Cushion, S. (2010). Design and evaluation of an online test: Assessment conceived as a complementary call tool. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 16(2), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.16.2.119.15879

Liu, Y. H., & Yu, F. Y. (2018). Supporting active learning and formative evaluation via teaching-by-questioning in classrooms: Design, development, and preliminary evaluation of an online learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5-6), 841-855. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1489858

Nakayama, M., Yamamoto, H., & Santiago, R. (2010). The role and use of essay tests in e-learning: A Japanese case study. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 8(2), 173-178. https://doi.org/EJ895705

Peterson, J. L. (2016). Formative evaluations in online classes. Journal of Educators Online-JEO, 13(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/EJ1087683

Putra, R. L., Maulana, A., & Iriani, T. (2019). Evaluasi program pelaksanaan ujian online dengan menggunakan learning management system moodle berbasis android di SMK Negeri 1 Jakarta. Jurnal PenSil, 8(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v8i1.8483

Rose, C., & Nyre, G. F. (1997). The Practice of Evaluation. Princeton.

Rosidin, U., Herpratiwi, H., Suana, W., & Firdaos, R. (2019). Evaluation of national examination (UN) and national-based school examination (USBN) in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 827-837. https://doi.org/2165-8714

Santi, M., & Prajana, A. (2018). Analisis implementasi ujian nasional berbasis komputer dengan ujian berbasis kertas di SMPN 3 Ingin Jaya Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Cyberspace: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 2(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.22373/cj.v2i2.3997

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models & applications. Jossey Bass.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan kombinasi (mixed methods). Alfabeta.

Wirawan. (2012). Student evaluation of instruction: Comparison between in-class and online methods. Rajawali Press.

Yulianto, H., Wahyuni, T., & Eka, Y. (2016). Ujian on line dalam e-learning: Perbandingan ujian online (computer based) terhadap ujian tradisional (paper based). Jurnal Vokasi Indonesia, 4(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.7454/jvi.v4i2.100

Yunus, N. R., & Rezki, A. (2020). Kebijakan pemberlakuan lock down sebagai antisipasi penyebaran corona virus covid-19. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 7(3), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i3.15083