•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Document Type

Article

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to develop instruments for measuring teacher candidates' social competence in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (the fourth I.R.) era. The instrument was developed by referring to Indonesian Law Number 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers and the Regulation of the Minister of National Education Number 16 of 2007 to strengthen some special competence of teacher candidates in the fourth IR era. Limited instrument testing was carried out to 107 test subjects for the 6th-semester undergraduate education program at Yogyakarta State University, consisting of three study programs: Mathematics Education, Indonesian Language Education, and English Language Education study programs. The results of the content validity analysis of 30 instrument items obtained the Aiken V index between 0.61 - 0.93, with 29 items valid, and one invalid item. The construct validity analysis with EFA showed 25 valid items and five invalid items, with a KMO value of 0.504. The significance of Bartlett's test was p = 0.000. Meanwhile, the construct validity analysis with CFA showed the model fit, with a Chi-Square value = 290.35 (p> 0.05). The reliability results show that the Cronbach's Alpha coefficient is 0.40 (moderate category). This shows that the social competency assessment instruments for teacher candidates in the fourth IR era developed are feasible to use, with several improvements.

First Page

125

Last Page

135

Issue

2

Volume

24

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v24i2.29482

References

Arifin, Z. (2017). Developing students' critical thinking skills measuring instruments in 21st century mathematics learning. Journal of THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 1(2), 92-100.

Boucher, M. D. (2012). Social competence education for pre-service teachers. California State University.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Teo, Y. H. (2019). Enhancing and modeling teachers' design beliefs and efficacy of technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st century quality learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 360-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117752453.

Chou, C. M., Shen, C. H., Hsiao, H. C., & Shen, T. C. (2018). Industry 4.0 manpower and its teaching connotation in technical and vocational education: Adjust 107 curriculum reform. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2018.01.002.

Chouhan, V. S., & Srivastava, S. (2014). Understanding competencies and competency modeling "• a literature survey. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.9790/487x-16111422.

Danim, S. (2011). Introduction to education. Alfabeta.

Friedenberg, L. (1995). Psychological testing: Design, analysis, and use. Allyn & Bacon.

Friedlander, E. W., Arshan, N., Zhou, S., & Goldenberg, C. (2019). Lifewide or school-only learning: Approaches to addressing the developing world's learning crisis. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 333-367. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218792841.

Ghorbani, S., Jafari, S. E. M., & Sharifian, F. (2018). Learning to be: Teachers' competences and practical solutions: A step towards sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 20-45. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0002.

Ghozali, I. & Fuad, F. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Theory, concepts, and applications with the Lisrel 8.54 program. Universitas Diponegoro Publishing Agency.

Gleason, N. W. (Ed). (2018). Higher education in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Springer.

Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Springer.

Ismail, S. N., Don, Y., Husin, F., & Khalid, R. (2018). Instructional leadership and teachers' functional competency across the 21st century learning. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11310a

Jacobs, L. C. (2014, November 7). Test reliability: IU Bloomington evaluation service and testing. Indiana University. http://www.indiana.edu.

Jima'ain, M. T. A., Mahpuz, A. N. A., Rahman, S. N. H. A., & Mohamad, A. M. (2019). Industrial revolution 4.0: Innovation and challenges of Islamic education teachers in teaching. International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences, 2(1), 38-47.

Jones, A. (2018). Vocational education for the twenty-first century. The University of Melbourne.

Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (2003). LISREL 8.54. Computer software. Scientific Software International.

La Velle, L., & Flores, M. A. (2018). Perspectives on evidence-based knowledge for teachers: Acquisition, mobilisation and utilisation. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(5), 524-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1516345.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 20 of 2003 on National Education System. , (2003).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 14 of 2005 on Teachers and Lecturers. , (2005).

Matondang, Z. (2009). Validity and reliability of a research instrument. Journal of Unimed PPS Tabularasa, 6 (1), 87-97.

Murti, B. (2011). Validity and reliability of measurement. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus. OECD Publishing.

Popkova, E. G., Ragulina, Y. V., & Bogovic, A. V. (Eds) (2018). Industry 4.0: Industrial revolution of the 21st century. Springer International.

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 16 of 2007 on Teacher's Academic Qualification and Competence Standard. , (2007).

Retnawati, H. (2014, October 6). Membuktikan validitas instrumen. Evaluation-Edu.Com. Retrieved May 10, 2015, from http://evaluation-edu.com/2014/10/06/membuktikan-validitas-instrumen/

Rosyada, D. (2016). Guru harus memiliki kompetensi sosial yang baik. Dede Rosyada Official Blog. Retrieved from http://dederosyada.lec.uinjkt.ac.id/reviews/guruharusmemilikikompetensisosialyangbaik

Scientific Literacy. (October 24, 2014). TIMSS international survey (Trends In International Mathematics and Science Study).

Sugiyono. (2010). Educational research methods: Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D approaches. Alfabeta.

Suharsaputra, U. (2010). Education administration. Refika Aditama.

Sulipan, S. (2007). Teacher professional development activities. Science Craft.

Suwardi. (2007). Learning management: Creating creative and competent teachers. PT. Temprina Media Grafika.

Tican, C., & Deniz, S. (2019). Pre-service teachers' opinions about the use of 21st century learner and 21st century teacher skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.181

Uno, H. B. (2011). Profesi kependidikan: Problema, solusi dan reformasi pendidikan di Indonesia. Bumi Aksara.

Van Hong, B., Tuyen, T., & Thi Luong, N. (2018). Teaching capacity of technology teachers: Applying in the training program of technology teacher in Vietnam. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(12), 1662-1667. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-12-11

Wagiran. (2015). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Budi Utama.

Download

Share

COinS