•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This study aims to describe the quality and implementation of authentic assessment planning of English subject at junior high schools in Yogyakarta. This evaluation research used a discrepancy evaluation model. It was conducted at three state junior high schools (Sekolah Menengah Pertama or SMP negeri) in Yogyakarta, which were pilot projects of Curriculum 2013, namely SMP Negeri 5, SMP Negeri 8, and SMP Negeri 15. The data in this study were obtained through documentation, interviews, and questionnaires. The sample was six English teachers of grade VIII and 549 grade VIII students who were taught by the teachers. The data analysis involved descriptive quantitative and qualitative analyses. The results of the study are as follows. First, 50% of the lesson plans made by teachers are in a good category. All (100%) of the lesson plans assess attitude, knowledge, and skill. Some of the lesson plans (33%) include assessment techniques that are in accordance with the competencies assessed, 50% of the lesson plans use high order thinking skill (HOTS) questions, while the other 50% use realistic questions. Second, 51% of the teachers conducted authentic assessments, which are in a good category. Most (77%) of the teachers assessed attitude, knowledge, and skill, 57% of them gave HOTS questions, most (87%) of them gave realistic questions, and most (63%) of them assessed attitude, knowledge, and skill during the learning process.

First Page

116

Last Page

124

Issue

1

Volume

24

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v24i1.28037

References

Agustina, M. R., Suraida, S., Alfian, A., & Syefrinando, B. (2018). Authentic assessment analysis based on the Curriculum 2013 at SMP Negeri 7 Muaro Jambi. BIODIK, 4(2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v4i2.6127

Azim, S. (2012). Authentic assessment: An approach to enhance and assess learning. Lambert Academic Publishing.

Azwar, S. (2014). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Dikli, S. (2003). Assessment at a distance: Traditional vs. alternative assessments. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 2(3), 13-19.

Education First EPI. (2017). Indeks kecapakan bahasa Inggris EF. EF.Co.Id. https://www.ef.co.id/epi/regions/asia/indonesia/

Kartowagiran, B., Hadi, S., Wahyumiani, N., Alfarisa, F., & Pusporini, W. (2019). Effectiveness of the AA "4C" authentic assessment model: A SingleCase-Research (SCR). The New Educational Review, 57(3), 200-209. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2019.57.3.16

Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model asesmen autentik untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa sekolah menengah pertama (SMP): Implementasi asesmen autentik di SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.10063

Kunandar, K. (2014). Penilaian autentik penilaian hasil belajar. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mardapi, D. (2014, September 18). Penilaian otentik: Bahan pelatihan penilaian otentik. Konferensi Himpunan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2017). Panduan penilaian oleh pendidik dan satuan pendidikan untuk sekolah menengah pertama. Ministry of Education and Culture of Republic of Indonesia.

Ndayizeye, O. (2017). Discrepancies in assessing undergraduates' pragmatics learning. Research and Evaluation in Education, 3(2), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v3i2.14487

Noviana, N., & Kartowagiran, B. (2015). Evaluasi implementasi penilaian otentik pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia pada Kurikulum 2013 di SMA. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3(2), 157-166. http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jep/article/view/1271/1146

Pahlevi, I. R. (2015). Implementasi metode pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Snowball Throwing untuk meningkatkan aktivitas belajar Akuntansi pada kompetensi dasar Administrasi Dana Kas Kecil siswa kelas XI Akuntansi 1 SMK YPKK 2 Sleman tahun ajaran 2014/2015. Thesis. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Popham, W. J. (2009). Instruction that measures up: Successful teaching in the age of accountability. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 104 of 2014 on the Learning Outcome Assessment by Educators in Primary and Secondary Education Levels, (2014).

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 58 of 2014 on Curriculum 2013 of Junior Secondary School/Madrasah Tsanawiyah, (2014).

Resnick, L. B., & Klopfer, L. E. (Eds.). (1989). Toward the thinking curriculum: An overview. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, K., Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers' knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215-230. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/1121

Revaival, R. (2015). Keyakinan dan praktik penilaian otentik oleh guru-guru bahasa inggris di SMP kota Tarakan. Master thesis. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Suarimbawa, K. A., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suprianti, G. (2017). An analysis of authentic assessment implementation based on Curriculum 2013 in SMP Negeri 4 Singaraja. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 1(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i1.9551

Suryawan, A., & Tawil, T. (2020). Analisis pemahaman guru SD dalam mengimplementasikan scientific approach pada Kurikulum 2013 di Kabupaten Magelang. Jurnal Holistika, 4(1), 14-21. https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/holistika/article/view/6551

Weber, M., & Stewart, B. R. (2001). Authentic assessment: Good or bad? The Agricultural Education Magazine, 73(5). https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-71777301/authentic-assessment-good-or-bad

Widowati, T., Aminah, N. S., & Cari, C. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian otentik berbasis scientific literacy pada pembelajaran Fisika di SMA sebagai implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Inkuiri: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v5i2.9466

Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2, 2. https://doi.org/10.7275/ffb1-mm19

Download

Share

COinS