PAPS predictive validity in predicting the learning success of master of professional psychology students

Authors

Flaviana Rinta Ferdian, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Saifuddin Azwar, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This study aims to determine the ability of Tes Potensi Akademik Pascasarjana (PAPS Test) in predicting the grade point average (GPA) of the graduate students of the Master of Professional Psychology. PAPS test is the graduate entry requirement test in UGM. Graduate students' GPA includes semester grade point average (semester GPA), cumulative grade point average (cumulative GPA), grade point average of master courses, and grade point average of professional courses. The data were obtained in the form of PAPS test scores (verbal subtest, reasoning subtest, quantitative subtest, and total score) and the GPA of the graduate students of Master of Professional Psychology of Universitas Gadjah Mada in the class of 2013, 2014, and 2015. The research subjects were 214 students. The analysis was carried out using correlation analysis. The results of the analysis generally indicate that the PAPS test is able to become a predictor of learning success for the graduate students in the Master of Professional Psychology of Universitas Gadjah Mada. The learning success consists of semester GPA, cumulative GPA, GPA of master courses, and GPA of professional courses. If analyzed per subtest, the quantitative subtest has the highest predictive power. On the other hand, the verbal subtest is only a good predictor for GPA of professional courses.

First Page

117

Last Page

128

Issue

2

Volume

23

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v23i2.25299

Recommended Citation

Ferdian, Flaviana Rinta and Azwar, Saifuddin (2019) "PAPS predictive validity in predicting the learning success of master of professional psychology students," Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Vol. 23: Iss. 2, Article 2.
DOI: 10.21831/pep.v23i2.25299
Available at: https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/jpep/vol23/iss2/2

References

Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Wadsworth.

Azwar, S. (1996). Pengantar psikologi inteligensi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2008). Kualitas Test Potensi Akademik versi 07A. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 12(2), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v12i2.1429

Azwar, S. (2015a). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2015b). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2016a). Dasar-dasar psikometrika (II). Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2016b). Konstruksi tes kemampuan kognitif. Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S., & Ancok, D. (2008). Validitas prediktif diferensial pada ujian tulis UM UGM. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Azwar, S., & Koentjoro, K. (1985). Validitas prediktif ujian masuk perguruan tinggi negeri tahun 1980 di Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada. Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://repository.ugm.ac.id/digitasi/download.php?file=4342_nurhayati_201307147_saifuddin azwar.pdf

Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Sturman, E. D. (2013). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement. McGraw-Hill Education.

Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2014). Psychometrics: An introduction. Sage Publications.

Goldberg, E. L., & Alliger, G. M. (1992). Assessing the validity of the Gre for students in psychology: A validity generalization approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1019-1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004026

Gregory, R. J. (2007). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Record Examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 162-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.162

Kurpius, S. E. R., & Stafford, M. E. (2006). Testing and measurement: A user-friendly guide. Sage.

Master Program of Professional Psychology. (2013). Panduan akademik 2013 program studi Magister Psikologi Profesi. Faculty of Psychology Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2015). Perkembangan pendidikan tinggi tahun 1999/2000"”2013/2014. Center for Data and Statistics of Education and Culture of Republic of Indonesia.

Mupinga, E. E., & Mupinga, D. M. (2005). Perceptions of international students toward GRE. College Student Journal. http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A133606109/AONE?sid=googlescholar

Nurhayati, N., & Widhiarso, W. (2017). Tes Potensi Akademik Pascasarjana (PAPS) sebagai Pprediktor prestasi belajar pada mahasiswa magister psikologi UGM. Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Powers, D. E. (2004). Validity of Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) general test scores for admissions to colleges of veterinary medicine. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 208-219. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.208

Pradipta, A. P., Kusumawardani, S. S., & Widyobroto, B. P. (2017). Hubungan antara nilai Tes Potensi Akademik dengan prestasi akademik mahasiswa program magister di Universitas Gadjah Mada. Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Public Relations of UGM. (2007). Meningkatkan jumlah mahasiswa S2 dan S3 melalui peningkatan jumlah beasiswa. Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/1440-meningkatkan-jumlah-mahasiswa-s2-dan-s3-melalui-peningkatan-jumlah-beasiswa

Rudner, L. M. (1994). Questions to ask when evaluating tests (pp. 1-7). ERIC/AE Digest.

Sackett, P. R., Laczo, R. M., & Arvey, R. D. (2002). The effect of range restriction on estimates of criterion interrater reliability: Implications for validation research. Personnel Psychology, 55(4), 807-825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00130.x

Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1997). Does the Graduate Record Examination predict meaningful success in the graduate training of psychology? A case study. American Psychologist, 52(6), 630-641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.630

Stobart, G., & Eggen, T. (2012). High-stakes testing - Value, fairness and consequences. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.639191

Thornell, J. G., & McCoy, A. (1985). The predictive validity of the Graduate Record Examinations for subgroups of students in different academic disciplines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(2), 415-419. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448504500229

Top Universities. (2017). QS World University Rankings 2018. QS Top Universities. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2018

Wang, W. (2013). Testing the validity of GRE scores on predicting graduate performance for engineering students. Thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.

Wao, J. O., Ries, R., Flood, I., Lavy, S., & Ozbek, M. E. (2016). Relationship between admission GRE scores and graduation GPA scores of construction management graduate students. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 12(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2015.1050562

Widhiarso, W. (2017). Format baru tes PAPS (Seri E) - UPAP Psikologi UGM. Unit for Psychodiagnostics Tools Development, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada. http://upap.psikologi.ugm.ac.id/format-baru-tes-paps-seri-e/