•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Keywords

model of evaluation; evaluation process; evaluation outcome; Islamic learning

Document Type

Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study is: (1) to create the products as the evaluation model learning programs of Islamic education in madrasah aliyah, suitable, precise, and accurate, (2) to know how to test the suitability of the model to obtain the evaluation model of Islamic Education learning programs in madrasah aliyah which is valid, and reliable, and (3) determine the effectiveness of the application of evaluation model of Islamic learning programs that was developed. This was a research and development method study (R & D), referring to the model of Borg & Gall, the development process was simplified into three steps, namely: (1) the stage predevelopment of models, (2) the stage of development of the model, and (3) the operational phase of the field (test model). The data were collected using questionnaires, interview, observation, documentation, and test. Data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative. The conclusion of this research and development is: (1) evaluation model of Islamic Religious Education Learning program developed comprising: (a) the evaluation procedures, (b) the evaluation instrument, and (c) the evaluation guide. (2) according to the experts, PAI teachers, and principals, procedures, instruments, and evaluation guidelines developed are already good, and can be used, d) the instrument developed is entirely valid (load factor > 0.3), reliable (CR > 0.7), and qualified as a fit model (RMSEA ‰¤ 0.08 and NFI, CFI and GFI > .90). second, the expert's opinion, PAI teachers and principals, the developed evaluation model (EPH model) is declared effective, practical, and easy to use, and supported by a valid and reliable instrument.

First Page

21

Last Page

33

Issue

1

Volume

21

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v21i1.12003

References

Agustian, A.G. (2003). ESQ power. Jakarta: Arga.

Azwar, S. (2013). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P., & Gall. M. D. (1993). Applying educational research: A practical guide. New York: Longman.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Mardapi, D. (2000). Evaluasi pendidikan. In Konvensi Pendidikan Nasional 19-23 September 2000. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Morrison, D. M., Mokashi, K., & Cotter, K. (2006). Instructional quality indicator: Research foundations. Cambrigde: Cambrigde University. Retrieved Mei 13, 2011, from www.co.nect.net.

Muhaimin. (2009). Rekonstruksi pendidikan islam (dari paradigma pengembangan, manajemen kelembagaan, kurikulum hingga strategi pengembangan). Jakarta: PT Grasindo Persada.

Norušis, M. J. (1986). SPSS/PC+ for theimbbc/xc/at. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

Sudjana, N. (2002). Dasar-dasar proses belajar dan mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (2003).

Sutrisno. (2006). Pendidikan islam yang menghidupkan. Yogyakarta: Kota Kembang.

Wahyudi. (2003). Penyusunan dan Validasi Kuesioner Iklim Lingkungan Pembelajaran di Kelas. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 043.

Zamroni. (2005). Mengembangkan kultur sekolah menuju pendidikan yang bermutu. In Seminar Nasional Mengembangkan Kultur Sekolah di Yogyakarta Retrieved November 23, 2005.

Share

COinS