•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Keywords

penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013; rubrik untuk soal uraian; penilaian pada pembelajaran tematik; rentang skor 1-4

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk: (1) mendeskripsikan implementasi penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013; (2) mengidentifikasi hambatan dan keberhasilan pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013, (3) memberikan rekomendasi kepada Pemerintah dalam mengambil kebijakan pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Populasi dalam evaluasi ini adalah sekolah di Indonesia jenjang sekolah dasar dan menengah. Penentuan sampel dengan purposive sampling, yaitu sekolah jenjang sekolah dasar dan menengah di 15 provinsi di Wilayah Indonesia Bagian Barat, Wilayah Indonesia Bagian Tengah, dan Wilayah Indonesia Bagian Timur. Pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner, dokumentasi, dan Focus Group Discussion(FGD). Data dianalisis dengan analisis deskriptif kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Model ini digunakan untuk mengevaluasi kesenjangan antara kriteria yang telah ditetapkan dengan pelaksanaan program di lapangan. Hasil penelitian dibagi tiga tahap, yaitu: (1) perencanaan, disarankan kepada pemerintah untuk melakukan sosialisasi dan pelatihan membuat kisi-kisi dahulu baru membuat soal-soalnya, bukan yang dilakukan sebaliknya, juga pelatihan analisis instrumen penilaian dan membuat rubrik untuk soal uraian; (2) pelaksanaan, disarankan kepada pemerintah untuk menyederhanakan pedoman penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013, melakukan sosialisasi dan pelatihan penilaian kompetensi sikap, untuk jenjang SD perlu diberikan pelatihan teknik penilaian pada pembelajaran tematik, dan membimbing guru melakukan kegiatan analisis instrumen dan revisi butir soal; (3) pelaporan, disarankan pengambil kebijakan mengkaji kembali penggunaan rentang nilai 1-4 pada penilaian pengetahuan dan keterampilan.

Kata kunci: penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013, rubrik untuk soal uraian, penilaian pada pembelajaran tematik, rentang skor 1-4

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ASSESSMENT IN THE CURRICULUM 2013

Abstract

The objectives of this study are (1) to describe the implementation of the assessment in the curriculum 2013, (2)to identify the obstacle and the success of the implementation of assessment in the curriculum 2013, and (3)to make a recommendation for policy makers to improve the implementation of assessment in the curriculum2013. The population of the study consist of the elementary schools, junior schools, and senior high schools in Indonesia. The sample was determined purposively, consisting of the elementary schools, junior schools, and senior high schools in 15 provinces in Indonesia. Data were collected through questionnaires and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative descriptive. The findings of this study are: (1) in the planning step, the recommendations were given to principals, teachers, and head of educational districts to make socialization and workshop on developing assessment grid first, and then writing items not the other way around, and make a rubric first when writing the essay items; (2) in the implementation step, the recommendation were given to government to simplify the guidance of assessment in the curriculum 2013, to make socialization and workshop about the affective assessment, workshop thematic assessment for elementary teachers, and guiding teachers to revise and analyze the instrument; (3) in the report step, the recommendation were given to policy makers to look back at the policy of using the score range 1-4, for assessing knowledge and psychomotor domain. Keywords: assessment incurriculum 2013, rubric for essay items, assessment in thematic learning, score range 1-4

First Page

166

Last Page

178

Issue

2

Volume

20

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

References

Allen, K. N., & Friedman, B. D. (2010). Affective learning: A taxonomy for teaching social work values. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 7(2).

Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, andassesing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educatioanl objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objective cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.

BSNP. (2015). Laporan pemantauan standar penilaian pendidikan. Jakarta: Sekretariat Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Chung, B. M. (1994). The Taxonomy in the Republic of Korea. In L. W. Anderson & L. A. Sosiak (Eds.), Bloom's taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective, ninety-third yearbook of the national society for the study of education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Custer, R. L., & et al. (2000). Using authentic assessment in vocational education. clearinghouse on adults, career, and vocational education. The Ohaio State University.

Eraslan, A. (2013). Teacher's reflection on the implementation of the new elementary school mathematics curriculum in Turkey. HU Journal of Education, 28(2), 152-162.

Fernandes, H. J. X. (1984). Testing and Measurement. Jakarta: National Educational Planning, Evaluation and Curriculum Development.

Foshay, A. W. (1969). Curriculum. In R. I. Ebel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research: A project of the American Educational Research Association (4th ed., pp. 5-119). New York: Macmillan.

Gierl, M. J., & Lai, H. (2013). Instructional Topics in Educational Measurement (ITEMS) Module: Using Automated Processes to Generate Test Items. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32(3), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12018

Lissitz, R. W., & Samuelsen, K. (2007). Further Clarification Regarding Validity and Education. Educational Researcher, 36(8), 482-484. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07311612

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.

Markle, R., & O'Banion, T. (2014). Assessing affective factors to improve retention and completion. Learning Abstracts, 17(11). Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/s/successnavigator/pdf/learning_abstracts_markle_obanion.pdf

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. (California, Ed.) (2nd ed.). Sage Publication.

Permendikbud No 66 Tahun 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Permendiknas No 20 Tahun 2007. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Popham, W. J. (2009). Instruction that up measures up. Virginia: ASCD.

Postlethwaite, T. N. (1994). Validity vs Utility: personal experiences with the taxonomy. In L. W. Anderson & L. A. Sosiak (Eds.), Bloom's taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective, ninety-third yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 174-180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Puskurbuk. (2012). Pergeseran paradigma belajar abad 21. Retrieved August 1, 2015, from http://www.puskurbuk.org

Puspendik. (2011). Tes tertulis. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Retnawati, H. (2015). Hambatan guru matematika sekolah menengah pertama dalam menerapkan kurikulum baru. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXIV(3).

Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2016). Vocational high school teachers' difficulties in implementing the assessment in curriculum 2013 in yogyakarta province of indonesia. International Journal of Intructional, 9(1), 33-48. Retrieved from http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2016_1_3.pdf

Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development. Theory and Practice. Foundations, process, design, and strategy for planning both primary and secondary curriculum. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. (1975). Curriculum development: theory into practice. New York: Macmillan.

Uno, H. B., & Koni, S. (2012). Assesment Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Wheeler, D. K. (1967). Curriculum process. London: University of London Press Ltd.

Zakaria, R. T. (2011). Penilaian sikap. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Download

Share

COinS