•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Keywords

assessment model, students’ akhlak, akhlaks’ constructs, instrument

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengembangkan model penilaian akhlak peserta didik Madrasah Aliyah. Konstruk akhlak dikembangkan dengan pendekatan akhlak sebagai aspek afektif dan konsep religiousity dari Glock and Stark (1966). Penelitian pengembangan ini menggunakan metode lapor diri dan observasi tak langsung, melibatkan 291 siswa dan 26 guru dengan teknik purposive sampling. Pengujian kualitas instrumen meliputi: validasi tampang, isi, dan konstruk; reliabilitas (konsistensi internal dan reliabilitas interrater); dan uji stabilitas instrumen. Hasil pe-nelitian ini adalah: (1) Model penilaian akhlak terdiri dari model pengukuran dan sistem peni-laian. Instrumen tersusun melalui proses expert judgment, Focus Group Disscussion dan pengujian konstruk. (2) Hasil analisis faktor konfirmatori (CFA) berdasarkan data empirik menunjukkan bahwa konstruk akhlak peserta didik mencakup dimensi akhlak kepada Allah, akhlak kepada Nabi Muhammad SAW., akhlak kepada orangtua, akhlak kepada diri sendiri, akhlak kepada guru, akhlak kepada teman/tetangga/masyarakat, dan akhlak kepada lingkungan. (3) Instrumen mempunyai kehandalan internal antara 0,865 - 0,921 (tinggi) dan reliabilitas interater 0,866 (tinggi) dan koefisien Cohens' Kappa 0,770 (sangat baik), serta stabilitas antara 0,715 sampai 0,858 (baik sampai sangat baik). (4) Sistem penilaian setelah disimulasikan dan dikonfirmasi menunjukkan 90 % kesesuaian dengan performansi akhlak siswa.

Kata kunci: model penilaian, akhlak peserta didik, konstruk akhlak, instrumen

______________________________________________________________

DEVELOPING A MODEL OF AN ASSESSMENT OF MADRASAH ALIYAH STUDENTS' AKHLAK

Abstract This study aims to develop a model of an assessment of Madrasah Aliyah students' akhlak. The constructs of students' akhlak are developed on the basis of the akhlak as affective domain and as a religiousity concept, adopting the ritualistic concept and consequences from Glock and Stark (1966). This research and development used self-report and indirect observations, involving 291 students and 26 teachers by using purposive sampling technique. The quality instrument testing consists of: validation process (face, content and construct), reliability (internal consistency and inter-rater reliability); and stability. The results of the study are as follows. (1) The model of an assessment of students' akhlak includes a measurement model and an assessment system for students' akhlak. The instrument is composed through the process of expert judgment, Focus Group Disscussion and testing constructs (2) The result of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) shows that constructs of students' akhlak cover the dimensions of akhlak to Allah, Prophet Muhammad, parents, self, teachers, society, and environment. (3) The internal reliability of instrument ranges from 0.865 to 0.921 (high); the inter-rater reliability is 0.851 (high) by Product Moment Correlation and Cohens' Kappa coefficient 0.770 (very good). Instruments stability levels ranging from being good to being very good (0.715 to 0.858). (4) the assessment system model after the simulation is confirmation yields an agreement of 90% with the respondents' performances.

Keywords: assessment model, students' akhlak, akhlaks' constructs, instrument

First Page

347

Last Page

368

Issue

2

Volume

17

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v17i2.1705

References

Abdalati, Hammuda. (1978). Islam in focus. Indianapolis, USA: Amanna Publi- cations.

Al-Qardhawi, Yusuf. (1981). Kumpulan hik- mah al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Press.

Anderson, Lorin W. (1981). Assessing affective characteristics in the schools. Bosotn Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon,Inc.

Anshari, Endang Saefuddin. (1986). Wawas- an Islam . Jakarta: Rajawali.

Azwar, Saefuddin. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. (edisi 4). Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Gall, J., Borg. W., & Gall, M. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education

Braswell, George W. (1996). Islam; It’s prophet, people, politics and power. Nashville, TN: Broadman and Holman Publisher.

BSNP, (2009). 8 Standar Nasional Pendidikan.Jakarta: Depdiknas.

. (2010). POS Ujian Nasional 2011.Jakarta: Kemendiknas.

Depdiknas. (2006). Undang-Undang Repub-lik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2005 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: DepDikNas.

Depdiknas. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: DepDikNas.

Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pen- didikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta: DepDikNas.

Goodlad, John I. (1984). A place called school, prospect for the future. USA: McGraw- Hill Book Company.

Griffin, Patrick E. (1991). Educational assessment and reporting. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Group. Australia.

Lawshe. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Journal Personal Psychology. India: Purdue University.

Levin, Henry M. ( 2011 ). The utility and need for incorporating non-cognitive skill into large scale educational assessments. Presen- ted at ETS Invitational on Internatio- nal Large – Scale Assessment and to be published by Educational Testing Service. USA: Teachers College, Columbia University.

Miskawaih. (1968). Tahdzibul akhlak. Edisi bahasa Indonesia diterjemahkan oleh Mustofa. Pustaka Setia. Bandung.

Shihab, Quraish. (1996). Wawasan al-Qur’an.

Bandung: Mizan.

Rahim, Husni. (2001). Arah baru pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Logos Wa- cana Islam.

Robinson, John. P and Shaver, Philip R. (1969). Measures of social psychological attitudes. dimension of religiousity. Survey Research Center (Institute for Social Research) The University of Michigan, Michigan, USA.

Siddiqui, Ataulah. (1997). Ethics in Islam: key consepts and contemporary challenges. Jour- nal of Moral Education, V.26. No:4. Liechester, UK:Islamic Foundation.

Steven M. Cahn, Peter J. Markie. (2006). Ethics: history, theory, and contemporary issues. Oxford University Press.

Swarup, Ram. (1983). Understanding Islam through hadis. New Delhi,India. Voice of India.

Waluchow, Wilfrid.J. (2003). The Dimension of ethics: an introduction to ethical theory. Broadviewpress. Canada

Yani, Ahmad. (2009). Be excellent, menjadi pribadi yang terpuji. Jakarta: Khairu Ummah.

Download

Share

COinS