STANDARDISASI PENILAIAN BERBASIS SEKOLAH

Authors

Bambang Subali, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Pujiati Suyata, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keywords

standardization of sssessment, learning continuum result of learning, CTT and IRT

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan panduan acuan standardisasi penilaian hasil belajar berbasis sekolah, kasus pada mata pelajaran Biologi dan Bahasa Indonesia di SMA. Hasil yang dicapai yakni tersusunnya panduan standardisasi penilaian yang terdiri dari (a) learning continuum Biologi dan Bahasa Indonesia SMA yang telah ditelaah pakar terkait, (b) Panduan Penyusunan Butir Tes Pola Konvergen dan Divergen, dan (3) Panduan Analisis Data Pengukuran Pendidikan menggunakan Program Quest dengan menggunakan bahasa Indonesia sebagai bahasa pengantar. Ketiga-nya sudah divalidasi melalui kegiatan diseminasi kepada para guru Biologi dan Bahasa Indonesia di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Kalimantan Barat, dan Nusa Tenggara Barat pada tahun kedua. Kemudian divalidasi lagi melalui kegiatan diseminasi kepada para widyaiswara di LPMP DI Yogyakarta, Jawa tengah, Bangka Belitung, Kalimantan Barat, Kalimantan Selatan, Sulawesi Selatan, dan Nusa Tenggara Barat pada tahun ketiga. Oleh karena itu, ketiga perangkat tersebut sudah dapat dijadikan pegangan bagi para praktisi di lapangan.

Kata kunci: standardisasi penilaian, learning continuum hasil belajar, CTT dan IRT

______________________________________________________________

THE STANDARDIZATION OF SCHOOL BASED ASSESSMENT

Abstract This study aims to develop the guidance of the standardization on the achievement assessment based on school, cases on Biology and Indonesian Language subjects in senior high schools. The study resulted standardization guidance consisting of (a) learning continuum of achievement on Biology and Indonesia Language at Senior High Schools; (b) the guidance of writing the instrument to measure convergent and divergent pattern of learning achievement on Biology and Indonesia Language at Senior High Schools; and (c) the guidance to analyse data of educational measurement by using Quest Program. Those have been validated through dessimination to Bilolgi and Indonesian teachers in DIY, Kalbar, and NTB Provinces in the second year, and again by the instructors of LPMP in DIY, Jateng, Ba-Bel, Kalbar, Kalsel, Sulsel, and NTB Provinces at the third year. Thereby all of that guidance can be used by the practitioners in the fields.

Keywords: standardization of sssessment, learning continuum result of learning, CTT and IRT

First Page

1

Last Page

18

Issue

1

Volume

17

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v17i1.1358

Recommended Citation

Subali, Bambang and Suyata, Pujiati (2013) "STANDARDISASI PENILAIAN BERBASIS SEKOLAH," Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Vol. 17: Iss. 1, Article 1.
DOI: 10.21831/pep.v17i1.1358
Available at: https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/jpep/vol17/iss1/1

References

Adams, R.J. & Kho, Seik-Tom. (1996). Acer Quest version 2.1. Camberwell, Victoria: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

Allalouf, A. (2007). An NCME instructional module on quality control procedures in the scoring, equating, and reporting of test scores. Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice. Washington: Spring 2007. Vol. 26, Iss. 1; pp. 36-43.

Atherton, J.S. (2005). Learning and Teaching; Convergent and Divergent Learning. Diakses pada tanggal 03-Des-2006: http://www.learningandteaching. info/learning/converge.htm.

Bond, T.G. & Fox, Ch.M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2-nd ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Brennan, R.L. (2001). Some problems, pitfalls, and paradoxes in educa- tional measurement [Versi elektronik]. Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice. Washington: Winter 2001.Vol. 20, Iss. 4; pp.6-18.

BSCS. BSCS is a non-profit organization. © Copyright (2010) BSCS All Rights Reserved (Biology Syllabus http://www.rickovernaval.org/ ourpages/auto/2009/9/3/54143865/ Biol)

Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory.

New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

− Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Tahun 17, Nomor 1, 2013

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan dasar dan Menengah.

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan untuk Satuan Pendidikan dasar dan Menengah.

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2006 tentang Pelaksanaan Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan dasar dan Menengah dan Peraturan Menteri Pen- didikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan untuk Satuan Pendidikan dasar dan Menengah.

Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Edward, J.R. & Bagozzi, R.P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationship constructs and measurement. Psychological Methods. 2000. Vol. 5. No. 2; pp.155-174.

Gorin, J.S. (2006). Test Design with cognition in mind. Educational Measure- ment, Issues and Practice. Washington: Winter 2006. Vol. 25, Iss. 4; pp.21-35.

Han, Kyung T. & Hambleton, R.K. (2007). User’s manual for wingen2: Windows software that generates IRT model parameters and item response. (Media elektronik]. Massachusetts: Center for Educational Assess- ment.

Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alter- native assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, Spring 2002, Vol.39, No. 1, pp.69-95.

IEA. (2003). TIMSS 2003 technical report. Finding from IEA’s trends in inter- national mathematics and science study at the forth and English grades. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

Jehlen, A. (2007). Testing how the sausage is made. NEA Today. Washing- ton: Apr 2007. Vol. 25, Iss. 7; pp.29-34.

Keeves & Alagumalai. (1999). New Approach to measurement. Dalam: Masters, G.N. & Keeves, J.P. (eds.). Advances in Measurement in Educa- tional Research and Assessment (pp.23-42). Amsterdam: Pergamon, An imprint of Elsevier Science.

Keeves, J.P. & Masters, G.N. (1999). Introduction Dalam: Masters, G.N. & Keeves, J.P. (eds.). Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment(pp.1-22). Amsterdam: Pergamon, An imprint of Elsevier Science.

Muraki, E. & Bock, R.D. (1998). Parscale: IRT item analysis and test scoring for rating scale data. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.

Roid, G.H. & Haladyna, Th.M. (1982). A technology for test-item writing. Orlan- do: Academic Press, Inc.

Subali, Bambang. (2009). Pengukuran keterampilan proses sains pola divergen dalam mata pelajaran biologi SMA di provinsi DIY dan Jawa Tengah. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Yogyakarta: Program Pascasarjana UNY

Thissen, D., Nelson, L, & Surygert, K.A. (2001). Item response theory applied to combination of multiple-choice and constructed response items−Approximation methods for scale score. Dalam: Thissen, D. & Wainer, H. (2001). Test Scoring (pp.293-324). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Wright & Masters, G.N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press.