ANALISIS ASESMEN FORMATIF FISIKA SMA BERBANTUAN KOMPUTER

Authors

Sentot Kusairi, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia

Keywords

analysis of physics formative assessment

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengembangkan model analisis asesmen formatif Fisika (AAFF) berbantuan komputer, (2) menemukan kharakteristik model analisis asesmen formatif Fisika berbantuan komputer, (3) menentukan kelayakan model analisis asesmen formatif Fisika berbantuan komputer. Penelitian yang dilakukan merupakan penelitian pengembangan (research and development), dengan desain pembelajaran (instructional design) oleh Dick dan Carey. Penelitian melibatkan beberapa Sekolah Menengah Atas di Kota Malang mulai Maret 2010 sampai dengan September 2010. Hasil pengembangan merupakan model AAF berbantuan computer, dengan karakteristik (1) Model dapat menggali kelemahan dan kesulitan belajar siswa, (2) Model analisis dapat memberikan umpan balik pada siswa tentang hasil tes, (3) Model AAFF dapat menghasilkan pengelompokan siswa berdasarkan kesulitan belajar atau siswa yang menderita miskonsepsi atau kesulitan tertentu, (4) model dapat menentukan siswa yang menjawab tidak konsisten.

Kata kunci: analisis asesmen formatif fisika (AAFF)

______________________________________________________________

A COMPUTER-ASSISTED ANALYSIS OF PHYSICS FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Abstract The objectives of this study are: (1) to develop a model for a computer-assisted analysis of physics formative assessment, (2) to find out the characteristics of the final product of the model, (3) to assess the feasibility of the final product of the model. This was a research and development study employing the instructional design by Dick and Carey. It involved several senior high schools in Malang City, conducted from March 2010 to September 2010. The result of the development is a model for a computer-assisted AAF with characteristics as follows. (1) The model can identify students' learning weaknesses and difficulties. (2) The model of the analysis can give students feedback about test results. (3) The AAFF model can result in students' grouping based on learning difficulties or students with misconceptions or learning difficulties. (4) The model can detect students answering inconsistently.

Keywords: analysis of physics formative assessment

First Page

68

Last Page

87

Volume

16

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v16i0.1106

Recommended Citation

Kusairi, Sentot (2012) "ANALISIS ASESMEN FORMATIF FISIKA SMA BERBANTUAN KOMPUTER," Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Vol. 16: Iss. 0, Article 4.
DOI: 10.21831/pep.v16i0.1106
Available at: https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id/jpep/vol16/iss0/4

References

Anderson, L. W. (2003). Classroom Assessment: Enhancing the Quality of Teacher Decision Making. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bose, J., & Rengel Z. (2009). A Model Formative Assessment Strategy to Promote Student-Centered Self-Regulated Learning in Higher Education [Versi Elektronik]. US-China Education Review, 6(12).

Boyle, J., & Fisher, S. (2007). Educational Testing: A Competence-Based Approach. Victoria: British Psychological Society.

Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A Model of Formative Education in Science Education. Assessment in Education, 6(1).

Cox Jr., C. T., Cooper M. M., Pease R., Buchanan K., Hernandez-Cruz L., Stevens R., Picione Thomas Holme T. (2008). Advancements in Curriculum and Assessment by the Use of IMMEX Technology in the Organic Laboratory [Versi Elektronik]. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, 25–34.

Dufresne, R. J., & GeraceW. J. (Oktober 2004). Assessing-To-Learn: Formative Assessment in Physics Instruction. The Physics Teacher, 42, 428-433.

King, K. V., Gardner, D. A., Zucker, S., Jorgansen, M. A. (Juli 2004). The Distractor Rationale Taxonomy: Enhancing Multiple-Choice Items in Reading and Mathematics. Pearson Education.

Lin, J., Chu, K., Meng, Y. (April 30, 2010). Distractor Rationale Taxonomy: Diagnostic Assessment of Reading with Ordered Multiple-Choice Items.

Lowry, R. (2005). Computer-Aided Self-Assessment: An Effective Tool. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(4), 198-203.

Nitko, A. J. (1989). Designing Tests That Are Integrated with Instruction: Educational Measurement. London: Collier Macmillan Publisher.

Obaidat I., & Malkawi E. (2009). The Grasp of Physics Concepts of Motion: Identifying Particular Patterns in Students' Thinking. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1-16.

Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. Virginia: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Shoulders, C. D., Hicks, S. A. (2008). ADEPT Learning Cycles Enhance Intermediate Accounting Student Learning Success [Versi Elektronik]. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(2), 161-182.

Stacey, K., Price, B., Steinle, V., Chick, H., Gvozdenko, E. (2010). SMART Assessment for Learning. ISDDE Conference 2009.

Suratno. (2009). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Teman Sejawat Kompetensi Akuntansi Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Kolaboratif. Disertasi Tidak Diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Thissen-Roe, A., Hunt E., Minstrell, J. (2004). The DIAGNOSER Project: Combining Assessment and Learning [Versi Elektronik]. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 234-240.

Vendlinski, T. P., Niemi, D. M., Wang, J., (Juli 2008). Improving Formative Assessment Practice with Educational Information Technology.

Warsito. (2010). Pengembangan Model Analisis Prestasi Belajar untuk Mengidentifikasi Kesulitan Belajar Peserta Didik. Disertasi Tidak Diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Padang.

Wasis. (2009). Model Penskoran Partial Credit Pada Item Multiple True False Bidang Fisika. Disertasi Tidak Diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.