•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Keywords

asesmen, asesmen formatif, assessment for learning, pendidikan matematika, pembelajaran

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menemukan cara mengembangkan model assessment for learning pada pembelajaran matematika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan model Hopkins & Clark. Subjek uji coba adalah 20 orang guru matematika dan 199 orang siswa kelas VII SMPN 13 dan SMPN 27 Makasar. Analisis data dilakukan dua tahap dan secara kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Ujicoba model AfL meng-gunakan repeated measures analysis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model assessment for learning yang dikembangkan memiliki lima karakteristik utama. pembelajaran lebih memberikan rasa keadilan bagi semua siswa, dan cocok diterapkan untuk semua mata pelajaran. Beberapa temuan dalam penelitian ini yaitu: (1) informasi yang diperoleh melalui penggunaan Model-AfL akurat dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan nyata siswa dan (2) penerapan Model-AfL dalam pembelajaran matematika me-ningkatkan motivasi, kepercayaan diri, kesadaran diri siswa, perilaku siswa selama pembelajaran, dan kemampuan siswa terhadap matematika; dan (3) kemajuan belajar siswa ditampil-kan melalui profil individu dan profil kelas.

Kata kunci: asesmen, asesmen formatif, assessment for learning, pendidikan matematika, pembelajaran

______________________________________________________________

DEVELOPMENT OF AN ASSESSMENT-FOR-LEARNING MODEL IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS

Abstract This study aimed to develop an assessment-for-learning (AfL) model in mathematics learning. This was a research and development study using the Hopkins & Clark model. The tryout subjects consisted of 20 mathematics teachers and 199 Year VII students of SMPN 13 and SMPN 27 Makasar. The data were analyzed in two stages by means of quantitative and qualitative techniques. The tryout of the AfL model used a repeated measures analysis. The results show that the developed AfL model has five main characteristics. The model provides all students with fairness and is appropriate for all subjects. Some research findings show that: (1) information obtained through the application of the AfL model is accurate and relevant to the students' real needs; (2) the application of the AfL model in mathematics learning improves students' motivation, self-confidence, self-awareness, behaviors during the learning process, and competence in mathematics; and (3) students' learning progress is presented through the individual and class profiles.

Keywords: assessment, formative assessment, assessment for learning, mathematics education, and learning

First Page

71

Last Page

91

Issue

1

Volume

15

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v15i1.1088

References

Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Norwich: DfES Publications. Diakses tanggal 02 Pebruari 2006 dari http://www.assessment-reform-group.org.uk.

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.

CEA. (Juli 2003). Quality statement on assessment practice (secondary). Diakses tanggal 01 Pebruari 2006 dari http://www.aaia.org.uk.

Cohen, B.H. (2001). Explaining psychological statistics. (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Cohen, R.J & Swerdlik, M.E. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to test and measurement. (6th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill

Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Fair Test Examiner. (1999). The value of formative assessment. Diakses tanggal 17Juni2006 dari http://www.provost.cmich.edu/assessment/ toolkit/formativesummative.html

Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows: Advanced techniques for the beginner. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pubications.

Grinnell, R.M. Jr. 1988. Social work research and evaluation. (3rd ed.). Itasca, Illinois: F.E. Peacock Publisher, Inc.

Havelock, R.G. (1976). Planning for innovation: Through dissemination and utilization of knowledge. Michigan: Institute for Social Research. The University of Michigan.

Kumaidi. (2005). Profil siswa dan kelas untuk bantuan peningkatan pembelajaran. Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian tentang Evaluasi Hasil Belajar serta Pengelolaannya, Tanggal 14-15 Mei 2005. Yogyakarta.

Kusnanto, B.A.(01 Pebruari 2006). Tiga metode baru pembelajaran mate- matika. Suara Merdeka, p. 1.

Linn, R.L. (1989). Educational measurement. (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Mansyur. (2009). Pengembangan model assessment for learning pada pembelajaran matematika di SMP. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta: Disertasi Doktor. Tidak diterbitkan.

Miller, I. & Miller, M. (2004). Mathematical statistics with applications. (7th ed.). New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Nitko, A.J., & Brookhart, S.M. (2007). Educational assessment of students. New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Pearson Education. (2006). Literacy objective: Assessment for learning. Diakses tanggal 30 Juni 2006 dari http://www.tda.gov.uk/teachers/ hottopics/assessment.aspx.

Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Zulkardi. (2002). RME: Suatu inovasi dalam pendidikan matematika di Indonesia. Diakses tanggal 10 Juni 2005 dari http://www.cascadeimei.com.

Download

Share

COinS