•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Keywords

instrumen asesmen kebutuhan, kurikulum bimbingan, instrument evaluasi program BK

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian pengembangan ini bertujuan menghasilkan instrumen asesmen kebutuhan peserta didik, disebut Invantori Kebutuhan Perkembangan Murid (IKPM). Penelitian mengikuti model Plomp (1999) dengan lima fase. Reliabilitas instrumen diestimasi dengan teknik Alpha Cronbach, validitas isi diperiksa oleh pakar dan telaah praktisi melalui FGD. Validitas empirik dan kecocokan model pengukuran dibuktikan dengan analisis faktor konfirmatori (CFA) dengan program Lisrel 8.30. Telaah praktisi melibatkan 60 orang guru kelas V dan VI SD dalam dua tahap FGD, sedangkan uji coba empirik dan implementasi melibatkan murid kelas V dan VI. Hasil penelitian pengembang-an ini adalah: 1) IKPM dapat digunakan untuk menghimpun data kebutuhan perkembangan sebagai dasar penyusunan kurikulum bimbingan dan melaksanakan evaluasi program, bimbingan dan alat ukur evaluasi program bimbingan klasikal di sekolah dasar dan 2) teridentifikasi butir-butir kebutuhan per-kembangan murid yang intens dan sangat intens untuk dipenuhi melalui layanan bimbingan klasikal.

Kata kunci: instrumen asesmen kebutuhan, kurikulum bimbingan, instrument evaluasi program BK

______________________________________________________________

DEVELOPMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT FOR CURRICULUM ARRANGEMENT AND EVALUATION OF BK PROGRAM

Abstract The goal of this research is to produce a developmental needs assessment instrument, called Student's Developmental Needs Inventory, which can be use to reveal the needs of students in elementary school. The research method follows the model of Research and Development (R & D) by Plomp (1999) with five phases. The instrument which is developed in this study guidance and counseling (Bimbingan Konseling, BK) in elementary school. Instrument reliability is estimated using by Alpha Cronbach technique, it content validity is checked by experts judgment and practitioner's assessment with FGD technique. Furthermore, empirical validity and the goodness of fit measurement model was measured with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) through the application of Lisrel 8.30 program. However, try out of test and implementation involves students of grade five and six elementary schools. The results of this research: (1) the instrument can be used to gathering data of developmental needs as based of guidance curriculum arrangement and to conduct program evaluation in elementary school, and (2) there are several items of student's developmental needs that needs to be fullfiled through classical guidance services.

Key words: needs assessment instrument, guidance curriculum, program evaluation instrument of guidance and counseling

First Page

22

Last Page

46

Issue

1

Volume

15

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v15i1.1086

References

American Educational Research Association. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: AERA-APA.

Brinkerhoff, R.O., et al., (1986). Program evaluation a practitioner’s guide for trainers and educators. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Brown, D. & Trusty, J. (2005). Designing and leading comprehensive school counseling programs, promoting student competence and meeting student needs. USA: Thomson Brools/Cole.

Dean, D.L. (1994). How to use focus groups. In J.S.Wholey, H.P.Hatry, & K.E.Newcomer (Eds.), Hanbook of praktical program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Erford, B.T. (2007). Transforming the school counseling profession (Second Edition). New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Hargreaves, D. (1982). The challenge for the comprehensive school. London: Routladge and Kegan Paul.

Jones, V.F. & Jones, L.S. (1998). Comprehensive classroom manajement. creating communities of support and solving problems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Joreskog, K. & Sorbom, D. (1993). Lisrel. 8: Structural equation modeling with the simplis command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

Linn, R.L. (1989). Educational measurement. (3rd ed). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Linstone, H.A. & Turoff, M. (2002). The delphi method techniques and applications. Electronic version.

Mardapi, Djemari, 2008) Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Jogjakarta: Mitra Cendikia.

Nurgiyantoro, B., Gunawan, & Marzuki. (2000). Statistik terapan untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia nomor 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar isi satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah.

Plomp,T. (1999). Design methodology and developmental research in/on education and training. Twente University. Netherlands

Puskur Depdiknas. (2006). Buku panduan pengembangan diri untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: BSNP dan Puskur Depdiknas RI.

Sink, A.C. (2005). Contemporary school counseling: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: Lahaska Press Houghton Mifflin.

Solimun. (2002). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Lisrel dan Amos. Malang: Fakultas MIPA Universitas Brawijaya.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Download

Share

COinS