•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan

Suratno Suratno

Keywords

asesmen teman sejawat, pembelajaran kolaboratif, pemecahan masalah akuntansi

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui adaptabilitas dan keefektifan model Asesmen Teman Sejawat (ATS) untuk mengukur kemampuan pemecahan masalah bidang Akuntansi Perusahaan Jasa. Subjek coba adalah mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi FKIP Unlam. Instrumen pengumpulan data terdiri atas: (1) tiga macam tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah, (2) angket skala lajuan kemampuan kerjasama kolaboratif, (3) rubrik penilaian analitik dan (4) log dan jurnal belajar. Data dianalisis dengan GLM Repeated Measures dan statistik non-parametrik. Kesimpulan menunjukkan bahwa ATS: (1) secara signifikan lebih baik daripada model asesmen konvensional. (2) tidak selalu tepat untuk mengungkap penguasaan kemampuan pemecahan masalah yang bersifat novelty, (3) memiliki kelayakan, adaptabilitas dan keberfungsian sebagai asesmen pelengkap untuk mengubah kultur belajar-mengajar konvensional, (5) yang ideal memiliki bobot proporsi untuk dosen berkisar antara 50% - 75% dan untuk mahasiswa berkisar antara 50% - 90%, dan (6) dapat meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan kemampuan kerjasama individu dan kelompok dalam belajar. Kata kunci: asesmen teman sejawat, pembelajaran kolaboratif, pemecahan masalah akuntansi

First Page

198

Last Page

226

Issue

2

Volume

13

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.21831/pep.v13i2.1410

References

Anderson, Lorin W. (2003). Classroom assessment: Enhancing the quality of teacher decision making.London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Astin, Alexander W. (1993). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. North Central at Indian School Road Phoenix: American Council on Education and The Oryx Press.

Bransford,J.D. & Stein, Barry S. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver: A guide for improving thinking learning and creativity. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Cennamo, Katherine & Kalk, Debby. (2005). Real world instructional design. Australia: Thomson Learning.

Covey, Stephen R. (1997). The 7 habits of highly effective people (7 kebiasaan manusia yang sangat efektif).(Edisi Revisi). (Alih bahasa oleh Budijanto). Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1993).

Cresswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Dahar, Ratna Wilis. (1989). Teori-teori belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Drew, David E. (1983). Advanced ocularmetrics:Graphing multiple timeseries residual data,Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 5, 1, 97-105.

Field, A. (2000) Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. Advanced techniques for the beginner. London: Sage Publications.

Foshay, Rob & Kirkley, Jamie. (2003). Principles for teaching problem solving. Technical Paper #4. Indiana University. Plato Learning, Inc.

Fullan, M.G., (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell Educational Limited.

Gagne, R.M. (1977). The conditions of learning(3rd ed.).New York: Holt-Rinehart and Winston.

Gagne, R.M. & Briggs, Leslie J. (1979). Principles of instructional design(2nded.).New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Gregory, A. & Yeomans, L. (1992). Peer assessment and enhancing students’ learning. Norwich: LTSN BEST, School of Management, University of East Anglia, University Plain, Norwich, Norfolk, NR47TJ, UK.

Gronlund, Norman E. & Linn, Robert L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (6thed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Harlen, W. (2007). Assessment of learning. Singapore: SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd.Harrow, A.J. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain a guide for developing behavioral objectives. New York: Longman Inc.

Hermanson, Edwards & Salmonson. (1989). Accounting principles(4thed.). Homewood, Boston: Richard D. Irwin Inc.

Herman, Aschbacher, and Winters. (1992). Select or design assessments that elicit established outcomes. Diambil tanggal 16 Agustus 2005 dari http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/methods/assment/as7refs.htm.

Howard, Sandra. (2001).“Collaborating with technology-guiding the teamwork”. Diambil tanggal 01 Januari 2006 http://www.millikin.edu/ webmaster/collaboration/collabora-tion5.html

Howard, S.A. (1999). Guiding collaborative teamwork in the classroom. Effective Teaching, 10, 5, 11-27.

Huang, Jiunn, O‟Shaughnessy, John & Wagner. (2005). Prerequisite change and its effect on intermediate accounting performance, Journal of Education for Business, 80, 5. ProQuest Education Journals.

Huffman, D. (1997). Effect of explicit problem solving instruction on High School Students, problem solving performance and conceptual understanding of physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 6. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, Roger T. (2002). Meaningful assessment: A manageable and cooperative process. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, Roger T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (2nd.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs.

Klein, S. B. (2002). Learning principles and applications(4thed.).New York: McGraw Hill.

Kreitner, R. & Kinicki, A. (2003). Perilaku organisasi. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Lundgren, L. (1994). Cooperative learning. New York: Glancoe McGraw Hill.

McQuaig, Douglas J. & Bille, Patricia A. (2006). How to solve accounting problems. Diambil tanggal 07 Januari 2006 dari http://college.hmco.com/accounting/mcquaig/college_acc/8e/student_resource/howto_solve/)

Moallem, Mahnaz. (2003). An interactive online course: A collaborative design model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51, 4, 85-103.

Newell, A., & Simon H. (1972). Human Information Processing, New York: Prentice-Hall,

Nitko, A.J. & Brookhart, S.M. (2007). Educational assessment of students (5thed.). Columbus, Ohio: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Nunnally, Jum C. (1978) Psychometric theory (2nded.).New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.

Polya, George. (1973). How to solve it(2nd.). Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-0897-6. Diambil tanggal 11 Desember 2005 dari http://www.math.utah.edu/ ~alfeld/math/polya. Html

Reigeluth, C. and Stein, S.F. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associaties. Publishers, Hillsdale.

Siddharta Utama. (2003). Profesionalisme akuntan dan proses pendidikan akuntansi di Indonesia. Dalam:Akuntansi Indonesia di tengah kancah perubahan. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia: 103-121.

Singgih Santoso (2000) Buku latihan SPSS statistik parametrik. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

Silber, Kenneth H. (2002). Using the cognitive approach to improve problem-solving training. Performance Improvement, 41, 3, 28-36.

Sluijsmans, D.M.A., (2002). Student involvement in assessment: The training of peer assessment skills. Kerkrade: Open Universiteit Nederland.

Totten, S., et. al. (1991). Cooperative learning: A guide to research. New York: Garland. Diambil tanggal 10 Desember 2005 dari http://www.indiana.edu/~educr795/ prop1.html

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Social development theory. Diambil tanggal 20 Juli 2005 dari http://www.tip.psychology.org/vygotsky.html

Weeb, Noreen.(1994). Group collaboration in assessment: Competing objectives, processes, and outcomes. CSE Technical Report 386 Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Diambil tanggal 20 Agustus 2005 dari http://cresst96.cse.ucla.edu/products/ reports_set.htm

Zamroni. (2000). Paradigma pendidikan masa depan.Yogyakarta: Bigraf Publishing.

Download

Share

COinS