Keywords
efikasi diri, kalkulus integral, self-efficacy, integral calculus course
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Penelitian kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pofil efikasi diri mahasiswa pada perkuliahan Kalkulus Integral. Subjek penelitian adalah 43 mahasiswa Program Studi Teknik Industri Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta yang mengikuti perkuliahan Kalkulus Integral. Instrumen pengumpulan data terdiri dari angket efikasi diri serta pedoman wawancara. Subjek mengisi angket efikasi diri. Hasilnya adalah 2% mahasiswa memiliki efikasi diri sangat tinggi, 40% tinggi, 51% sedang, 7% memiliki efikasi diri rendah. Selanjutnya dipilih 6 mahasiswa, masing-masing 2 mahasiswa dengan efikasi diri tinggi, sedang, rendah untuk diwawancarai. Hasilnya yaitu mahasiswa dengan efikasi diri tinggi dan sedang tidak putus asa dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan Kalkulus Integral, sedangkan mahasiswa dengan efikasi diri rendah putus asa saat menghadapi permasalahan tersebut. Mahasiswa dengan tingkat efikasi diri tinggi, sedang, dan rendah belum mampu mempelajari materi sulit Kalkulus Integral secara mandiri. Akan tetapi, mereka mampu menyelesaikan tugas dan mengumpulkannya tepat waktu. Usaha belajar mereka belum optimal dengan berbagai macam penyebab sehingga mereka tidak yakin mampu mencapai prestasi belajar yang ditargetkan, terkecuali dua mahasiswa dengan efikasi diri tinggi dan sedang.
Self-efficacy of university student in integral calculus course
Abstract
This qualitative research aimed to describe students' self-efficacy profile on Integral Calculus course. The subjects were 43 students of Industrial Engineering Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, who attended Integral Calculus course. The instruments used to data collecting were self-efficacy questionnaire and interview guidelines. The subjects were given self-efficacy questionnaire. The results showed that 2% of students had very high of self-efficacy, 40% high, 51% middle, the remaining 7% students had low self-efficacy. Six students were selected to be interviewed, consisted of 2 students with high, middle, and low self-efficacy. The interview results were students with high and middle self-efficacy were not give up to solve Integral Calculus problems, while students with low self-efficacy tend to desperate when solving the problems. Students with high, middle, and low self-efficacy levels had not been able to study the Integral Calculus difficult material independently. However, they were able to complete the task and collect it on time. Their learning efforts have not been optimal with a variety of causes so they were not confident for reaching optimum achievement, except two students with high and middle self efficacy level.
Page Range
181-189
Issue
2
Volume
5
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.21831/jrpm.v0i0.20271
Source
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/20271
Recommended Citation
Purnomo, M. E., Sari, C. K., Rejeki, S., & Machromah, I. U. (2018). Efikasi diri mahasiswa pada perkuliahan kalkulus integral. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 181-189. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v0i0.20271
References
Azwar, S. (1996). Tes prestasi fungsi pengembangan pengukuran prestasi belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bature, I. J., & Jibrin, A. G. (2015). The perception of preservice mathematics teachers on the role scaffolding in achieving quality mathematics classroom instruction. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(4), 275-287.
Chambers, P. (2008). Teaching mathematics developing as a reflective secondary teacher. London: SAGE Publications.
Gable, R. K. (1986). Instrument development in the affective domain. New York, NY: Springer.
Irwansyah, B. (2013). Self-efficacy mahasiswa prodi PMA dalam pembelajaran kalkulus. Logaritma, 1(2), 115-125.
Jaafar, W. M. W., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2010). Mathematics self-efficacy and meta-cognition among university students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 519-524.
Machromah, I. U., Purnomo, M. E. R., Febriyanti, K., Rahmawati, H. E. B. (2017). Arithmatics skill: Kesulitan utama mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan soal kalkulus integral. Prosiding, Seminar Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY 2017 yang diselenggarakan oleh FMIPA UNY, tanggal 11 November 2017. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(4), 218-227.
Mercer, S. (2011). Towards an understanding of language learner self-concept. London, UK: Springer.
Motlagh, S. E., Amrai, K., Yazdani, M. J., Abderahim, H. A., & Sauri, H. (2011). The relationship between self-efficacy and academic achievement in high school students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 765-768.
Pimta, S., Tayruakham, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Factor influencing mathematic problem solving ability of sixth grade students. Journal of social sciences, 5(4), 381-385.
Purnomo, M. E. R., & Machromah, I. U. (2017). Solid geometry learning: Student errors in solving solid geometry problems at university level. Jurnal Daya Matematis, 5(3), 408-418.
Putri, U. H., Mardiyana, M., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2017). How to analyze the students' thinking levels based on SOLO taxonomy? IOP Conference Series: Journal of Physics, 895, 1-8.
Putri, R., & Santosa, R. (2015). Keefektifan strategi REACT ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan penyelesaian masalah, koneksi matematis, self-efficacy. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 262-272. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v2i2.7345
Sari, C. K., Machromah, I. U., & Safika, K. N. S (2017). Pemanfaatan teknologi dalam pembelajaran kalkulus: Mendukung atau sia-sia? Prosiding, Seminar Nasional Kedua Pendidikan Berkemajuan dan Menggembirakan (The Second Progressive and Fun Education Seminar) yang diselenggrakana oleh , tanggal 3 Agustus 2017. Mataram: ALPTK PTM, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Sevimli, E. (2016). Do calculus students demand technology integration into learning environment? Case of instructional differences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(37), 1-18.
Sopiyanti, F. (2011). Pengaruh self-efficacy terhadap penyesuaian akademik mahasiswa. Psympathic, Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, IV(1), 289-304.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suryadi, B. & Santoso, T. I. (2017). Self-efficacy, adversity quotient, and students' achievement in mathematics. International Education Studies, 10(10), 12-19.
Urdan, T., & Pajares, F. (2006). Selfefficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing
Utami, R., & Wutsqa, D. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dan self-efficacy siswa SMP negeri di Kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 166-175. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.14897
Wijaya, I. P., & Pratitis, N. T. (2012). Efikasi diri akademik, dukungan sosial orangtua dan penyesuaian diri mahasiswa dalam perkuliahan. Jurnal Persona, 1(1), 40-52.
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Education psychology (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Yusuf, M. (2011). The impact of self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and self-regulated learning strategies on students' academic achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2623-2626.
